- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Found this lovely EA comic strip on Reddit...
Posted on 8/20/19 at 11:20 am
Posted on 8/20/19 at 11:20 am
Posted on 8/20/19 at 12:10 pm to finchmeister08
Posted on 8/20/19 at 1:34 pm to finchmeister08
I think EA gets a bad rep.
Posted on 8/20/19 at 2:55 pm to brucevilanch
Because they are the worst video game company
Posted on 8/20/19 at 3:35 pm to CarolinaGamecock99
What makes you say that?
Posted on 8/20/19 at 3:42 pm to brucevilanch
Here's a reason...
LINK
the arrogance in that last bold statement is pretty insulting and it showed in Battlefield 5 sales.
quote:
The CCO also noted how “this is a game,” highlighting a point that should be obvious — authenticity doesn’t matter as much as appealing to a broad base of players. If authenticity mattered in games that much, then those complaining about Battlefield 5 would have perhaps preferred a portion of Battlefield 1 devoted to a soldier incapacitated with trench foot.
“And we don’t take any flak,” Soderlund concluded. “We stand up for the cause because I think those people who don’t understand it, well, you have two choices: either accept it or don’t buy the game. I’m fine with either or. It’s just not ok.”
LINK
the arrogance in that last bold statement is pretty insulting and it showed in Battlefield 5 sales.
Posted on 8/20/19 at 4:37 pm to finchmeister08
Wow, a company didn't cave to the neckbeard pussies on Reddit and Twitter. #sobrave
This post was edited on 8/20/19 at 4:38 pm
Posted on 8/20/19 at 5:00 pm to brucevilanch
quote:
Wow, a company didn't cave to the neckbeard pussies on Reddit and Twitter. #sobrave
actually, that's who they catered
Posted on 8/20/19 at 5:07 pm to finchmeister08
quote:
Wow, a company didn't cave to the neckbeard pussies on Reddit and Twitter. #sobrave
quote:Yea.
actually, that's who they catered
That is, in fact, the group they caved too.
Reddit and Twitter are the hot beds of progressive neck beards.
Posted on 8/20/19 at 5:10 pm to finchmeister08
lulz to the idiots who still think the sales of BFV had anything to do with that
Posted on 8/20/19 at 5:14 pm to sicboy
quote:That was definitely not the only factor.
lulz to the idiots who still think the sales of BFV had anything to do with that
The game itself was shitty and wasn’t fun to play.
This post was edited on 8/20/19 at 5:16 pm
Posted on 8/20/19 at 5:43 pm to Scruffy
That and they misread the market. They put out a WWI game that no one was expecting, which was fine. I thought it was fun and a nice change of pace, fully counting on the next one to go back to modern combat.
There was an article in Kotaku or Polygon where it was reported that EA had BFV as a one of their backups. If BF1 did poorly, they'd go back to modern. If it did well, apparently they would take it as "this is what the players want right now", and everyone was done. That and it being barbones and their BR mode not coming out until the next year doomed it from the start
There was an article in Kotaku or Polygon where it was reported that EA had BFV as a one of their backups. If BF1 did poorly, they'd go back to modern. If it did well, apparently they would take it as "this is what the players want right now", and everyone was done. That and it being barbones and their BR mode not coming out until the next year doomed it from the start
Posted on 8/20/19 at 6:13 pm to finchmeister08
quote:
actually, that's who they catered
I meant that they didn't cave to the ones who were so upset about the cyborg lady and black guy Nazi.
This post was edited on 8/20/19 at 6:14 pm
Posted on 8/21/19 at 8:00 am to sicboy
quote:
Polygon
If Polygon wasn't owned by woke Vox I might look at their content.
Same with the Verge. I loved the Verge, I loved those guys who came from Engaget. Then around 2014 they become woke. It went from website to podcast. It's like a plague.
Posted on 8/21/19 at 8:26 am to LSU Coyote
Polygon's staff is noob central, and that was true even before the infamous Doom 2016 and Rock Band 4 coverage.
This post was edited on 8/21/19 at 8:29 am
Posted on 8/21/19 at 8:30 am to SonicAndBareKnuckles
quote:
Polygon's staff is noob central, and that was true even before the infamous Doom 2016 and Rock Band 4 coverage.
They are but quality is there.
Some articles feel like they tried to get a story that no one else thought of.
I just can't read anything because it's written by whiney kids.
Posted on 8/21/19 at 8:40 am to LSU Coyote
Pretty sure it was a Kotaku article by Scheier. He's all over these "this developer is fricking up" stories.
Posted on 8/21/19 at 9:52 am to sicboy
quote:
Pretty sure it was a Kotaku article by Scheier. He's all over these "this developer is fricking up" stories
Ole Jason does good work.
Posted on 8/21/19 at 12:04 pm to LSU Coyote
quote:
Same with the Verge. I loved the Verge, I loved those guys who came from Engaget. Then around 2014 they become woke. It went from website to podcast. It's like a plague.
There's nothing wrong with having situational sensitivity and compassion.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News