Started By
Message
locked post

Do you think we need a solid Civil War era game?

Posted on 3/28/09 at 1:06 pm
Posted by Drof Noitidepxe
Cobra Commander
Member since Mar 2009
147 posts
Posted on 3/28/09 at 1:06 pm
RTS, FPS, MMORPG or anything else.

I went to Vicksburg yesterday to tour the Civil War National Park, and with all of the awesome campaigns that happened during the war, if done right, an excellent game could be built.

Maybe have it be a RTS where you begin playing at the conception of the Civil War, and you have to pick a side and guide them into the various battles of the war. You could lead the North or South to victory, and the game would play out accordingly.

Just some musings on the subject.
Posted by LSU Delts
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2007
2548 posts
Posted on 3/28/09 at 2:10 pm to
History Channel: Civil War

From what I hear and read in some circles is this game is not as bad as the ratings gave it. Many believe this game got poor reviews due to the fact that you have to reload your rifle after every shot and this took away from the game. That is what some like about it because it was realistic. I have never played.

Reviews
This post was edited on 3/28/09 at 2:13 pm
Posted by thatguy
Member since Aug 2006
6887 posts
Posted on 3/28/09 at 4:11 pm to
no the history channel game was pretty horrible. i beat it within a couple of hours. very shallow and not the slightest bit fun. and i'm a huge civil war buff too
Posted by SpqrTiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2004
9252 posts
Posted on 3/29/09 at 10:49 am to
Maybe the Total War series could take this on. That line of games seems to be the best at blending strategy and battlefield tactics. The battlefield action isn't perfect (tends to be a little too orderly) but it beats the hell out of RTS format, which isn't realistic on ANY level at all.

I've you've played and beaten one RTS, you've beaten them all.
Posted by LSUmudbug
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2009
33 posts
Posted on 3/29/09 at 11:46 pm to
It would be dumb bc it would take too long to reload weapons...
Posted by biggsc
32.4767389, 35.5697717
Member since Mar 2009
34209 posts
Posted on 3/30/09 at 12:56 am to
The Call of Duty series should develop a Civil War aka War between the States game
Posted by 9Fiddy
19th Hole
Member since Jan 2007
64004 posts
Posted on 3/30/09 at 5:10 am to
They toyed with the idea of a SIMS: Plantation Life game, but for some unknown reason it fell through.
Posted by SG_Geaux
1 Post
Member since Aug 2004
77911 posts
Posted on 3/30/09 at 8:56 am to
quote:

It would be dumb bc it would take too long to reload weapons...


God forbid you not be able to run and gun and bunnyhop
Posted by TheDoc
doc is no more
Member since Dec 2005
99297 posts
Posted on 3/30/09 at 9:19 am to
quote:

bunnyhop


Posted by SprintFun
Columbus, OH
Member since Dec 2007
45794 posts
Posted on 3/30/09 at 9:33 am to
I think the subject is too touchy...unless you guys are cool with getting beaten. I would not be in favor of a civil war game where the confederacy could win FWIW and I doubt many of you guys would jump at the chance to play a north campaign where you defeat the south.
Posted by SG_Geaux
1 Post
Member since Aug 2004
77911 posts
Posted on 3/30/09 at 9:39 am to
quote:

I would not be in favor of a civil war game where the confederacy could win FWIW


That is retarded IMO. There are WWII Games where the Germans can win. I guess we have to stop making WWII Games.


It's just a game
This post was edited on 3/30/09 at 11:37 am
Posted by TheDoc
doc is no more
Member since Dec 2005
99297 posts
Posted on 3/30/09 at 10:12 am to
quote:

SprintFun


it's just a game.

chill.
Posted by itawambadog
America, F Yeah!
Member since Nov 2007
21266 posts
Posted on 3/30/09 at 11:20 am to
THE SOUTH WILL RISE AGAIN, in the virtual world
Posted by SprintFun
Columbus, OH
Member since Dec 2007
45794 posts
Posted on 3/30/09 at 1:05 pm to
quote:

There are WWII Games where the Germans can win. I guess we have to stop making WWII Games.


Ok, name some because I cant think of any off the top of my head.

EDIT: If it was a RTS then it would be cool, but a campaign type FPS
This post was edited on 3/30/09 at 1:10 pm
Posted by DesertFox
Houston, TX
Member since Jan 2004
1052 posts
Posted on 3/30/09 at 6:28 pm to
There actually already is a very good Civil War game out there. It is similar to the tactical battle part of Total War, although MUCH better (and more realistic) IMO. The smallest unit you control is a regiment, so it does away with issues you'd have controlling one soldier (like reloading).

It's called Take Command, and you can read about it here.
Posted by thatguy
Member since Aug 2006
6887 posts
Posted on 3/30/09 at 6:50 pm to
i've actually played that too. it's ok but i got tired of it pretty fast
Posted by Drof Noitidepxe
Cobra Commander
Member since Mar 2009
147 posts
Posted on 3/30/09 at 7:29 pm to
quote:

They toyed with the idea of a SIMS: Plantation Life game, but for some unknown reason it fell through.


Posted by Drof Noitidepxe
Cobra Commander
Member since Mar 2009
147 posts
Posted on 3/30/09 at 7:32 pm to
quote:

I think the subject is too touchy


It's been 150 years.

quote:

unless you guys are cool with getting beaten


See point #1; no one takes it personal.

quote:

I would not be in favor of a civil war game where the confederacy could win FWIW


Why not? It's not an endorsement of slavery or anything

quote:

I doubt many of you guys would jump at the chance to play a north campaign where you defeat the south


I would intentionally sabotage the Union effort.
Posted by Tigah in the ATL
Atlanta
Member since Feb 2005
27539 posts
Posted on 3/31/09 at 2:38 am to
quote:

RTS
You gonna spend 3 years on a game?
Posted by Drof Noitidepxe
Cobra Commander
Member since Mar 2009
147 posts
Posted on 3/31/09 at 10:05 am to
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram