- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 5/4/22 at 8:55 pm to t00f
In general, I agree about higher proofs. However, vfrb is great and so is EC18. I'd gladly take backups of both if I found at retail.
Posted on 5/4/22 at 8:58 pm to dnwsr
Missing the islands, so this will have to do until I can get back in July.


Posted on 5/4/22 at 8:59 pm to t00f
quote:
yeah, but I do need to open this woodford VFRB soon It is 16 year.
Pretty sure that’s Masters Collection Edition 16, but it’s non-age stated

NPD

Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:11 pm to t00f

Lil nip of Rye before calling it a night
Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:12 pm to t00f
quote:
ThirdPD
Blue Note Cross Roads toasted in French oak
I just bought this because I was bored and at Costco. How is it? Will bust open Friday.
Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:15 pm to t00f
Yeah, I remember there being some conversation about how it’s misleading because looking at it you would assume that it’s 16 years old, but the labeling doesn’t say that. Just says 16th edition or whatever. But the 16 is prominently displayed like it would be the age.
Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:23 pm to Epic Cajun
Per Breaking Bourbon
It's up in the air with age but it appears to be in line but not confirmed.
"Historically, Master’s Collection releases could often be characterized as unique and even experimental expressions, with unique barrel finishes and different mashbills being common. This particular expression contrasts many in the sense that it is the same mashbill, proof, and also does not have an age statement - no different than Woodford’s flagship Distiller’s Select Bourbon, a $35 readily-available ongoing release.
With Very Fine Rare Bourbon however, Woodford has included their oldest bourbon yet in this batch, a group of 17 year old barrels that had been held back to batch with other barrels for the release. While it’s not uncommon for companies to reference an age, or ages, of barrels used in a blend without disclosing percentages used, it is more common to reference the range of ages used even if exact percentages are not provided. This could be said of Four Roses’ annual Limited Edition Small Batch release, ongoing High West and Barrell Bourbon releases, and some of Wild Turkey’s releases, to name a few.
What’s a bit frustrating in this case is the fact that we only know there are 17 year old barrels in the blend. Based solely on the label, which makes no reference to age, in theory this could mean that only a small percentage are 17 years old, while the rest could be as young as 4 years. It’s a fine line to walk when it comes to a brand’s marketing strategy, though I would wager most who only skim the marketing materials might actually believe the bourbon is 17 years old. It took me a second read-through of the press release to realize it’s a blend of multiple ages, with an unknown number of barrels being 17 years old and the remainder being some other undisclosed age(s).
Label and marketing frustrations aside, the bourbon tastes quite good and certainly highlights its higher age component quite well. In fact, the balance between the higher age notes and the bright, lively notes is effective. Compared to the standard Distiller’s Select, the age is more amplified without compromising the brighter notes at all. Moreover, I often notice an unusual almost chemical-like flavor in the standard Distiller’s Select, which is (thankfully) completely absent from this Master’s Collection release."
Prior OP made me take a pour for memory purposes. I'll say this, prob their best release at this point

It's up in the air with age but it appears to be in line but not confirmed.
"Historically, Master’s Collection releases could often be characterized as unique and even experimental expressions, with unique barrel finishes and different mashbills being common. This particular expression contrasts many in the sense that it is the same mashbill, proof, and also does not have an age statement - no different than Woodford’s flagship Distiller’s Select Bourbon, a $35 readily-available ongoing release.
With Very Fine Rare Bourbon however, Woodford has included their oldest bourbon yet in this batch, a group of 17 year old barrels that had been held back to batch with other barrels for the release. While it’s not uncommon for companies to reference an age, or ages, of barrels used in a blend without disclosing percentages used, it is more common to reference the range of ages used even if exact percentages are not provided. This could be said of Four Roses’ annual Limited Edition Small Batch release, ongoing High West and Barrell Bourbon releases, and some of Wild Turkey’s releases, to name a few.
What’s a bit frustrating in this case is the fact that we only know there are 17 year old barrels in the blend. Based solely on the label, which makes no reference to age, in theory this could mean that only a small percentage are 17 years old, while the rest could be as young as 4 years. It’s a fine line to walk when it comes to a brand’s marketing strategy, though I would wager most who only skim the marketing materials might actually believe the bourbon is 17 years old. It took me a second read-through of the press release to realize it’s a blend of multiple ages, with an unknown number of barrels being 17 years old and the remainder being some other undisclosed age(s).
Label and marketing frustrations aside, the bourbon tastes quite good and certainly highlights its higher age component quite well. In fact, the balance between the higher age notes and the bright, lively notes is effective. Compared to the standard Distiller’s Select, the age is more amplified without compromising the brighter notes at all. Moreover, I often notice an unusual almost chemical-like flavor in the standard Distiller’s Select, which is (thankfully) completely absent from this Master’s Collection release."
Prior OP made me take a pour for memory purposes. I'll say this, prob their best release at this point

Posted on 5/4/22 at 10:13 pm to Front9Bandit
quote:
Blanton's is in Cenla. Stores are holding it until tomorrow morning
Why?
From what I've gathered, 3 stores went in together and got a barrel pick. They split it equally between them and agreed to release at the same time for $79.99

This post was edited on 5/4/22 at 10:16 pm
Posted on 5/4/22 at 10:17 pm to jpggpj
quote:
But I’ve also never had a 90 proof that I’d pay $100+ for either.
M10 rye is just over 90 proof and phenomenal, but it's the exception

Posted on 5/4/22 at 10:30 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
M10 rye is just over 90 proof and phenomenal, but it's the exception
good stuff

Posted on 5/4/22 at 11:11 pm to t00f
There is excellent news coming for LA regarding Willett Rye and Bourbon picks.
"Excellent" undersells it really.
"Excellent" undersells it really.
Posted on 5/4/22 at 11:31 pm to Tiger Attorney
There’s some good damn news
Late pour is the cheat code


Late pour is the cheat code

Posted on 5/5/22 at 7:07 am to Tiger Attorney
quote:
There is excellent news coming for LA regarding Willett Rye and Bourbon picks.
"Excellent" undersells it really.

Any word on that High West pick?
Posted on 5/5/22 at 7:39 am to Tiger Attorney
7 year Willett bourbon? Oofff
Posted on 5/5/22 at 8:27 am to t00f
I know this ain't worth $80, but I figure why not


Posted on 5/5/22 at 9:29 am to LSU6262
That the store pick being released at a few stores today?
Popular
Back to top
