The spoiler narrations on Food Network's competition shows

First of all, the amount of narration is completely out of hand. For instance, during the original Iron Chef show, they'd break away for about a thirty second interview after the secret ingredient where the Chef would outline their goals for the dishes and briefly talk about the secret ingredient, which I liked because you get into the Chef's head. The rest of the show was cooking. Today, with these shows like Chopped, Beat Bobby Flay, Guy's Triple G, The Next Food Network Star, etc., the amount of post competition commentary interviewing that they splice in during the cooking process is ridiculous, not to mention how the shows always manage to spoil the outcome. Example: A judge will say, "I hope Chef Smith gets his meat in the pan soon because it takes a long time to cook." Then they break to a recap interview with the Chef, "I spent too much time on the sauces and I'm putting my meat in the pan far later than I wanted to. I just hope it cooks enough so that the judges are happy." Well, guess what happens 99% of the time...during judging, a judge will say that the presentation looks great, the components work well together, but the meat is under cooked. Gee, I didn't see that coming. I want to see more of the cooking dammit. I really don't care if they beat cancer, heroin, or lost their Mother at a young age or any of that crap that the FN tends to incorporate into their shows.

/rant