- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Restaurant employees gloves and mask
Posted on 4/13/20 at 8:16 am
Posted on 4/13/20 at 8:16 am
Is it the law or just common sense that restaurant employees wear gloves and a mask in Louisiana?
Posted on 4/13/20 at 8:34 am to Sal Minio
It is just a recommendatin that most are following. Gloves have never been a law at any time
This post was edited on 4/13/20 at 8:35 am
Posted on 4/13/20 at 11:15 am to Sal Minio
Gloves are usually dependant on the health inspector that is assigned to the area. Some are all about them and some don't like them. Gloves give a false sense of security not to wash one's hands as much. Some companies mandate them also.
Posted on 4/13/20 at 11:16 am to jmarto1
quote:
Gloves have never been a law at any time
Gloves are a visual feel good item for customers, but funny enough only benefit the wearer.
Posted on 4/13/20 at 11:23 am to Fat Batman
How? Does Corona get absorbed by the skin on your hands?
Posted on 4/13/20 at 11:25 am to cable
quote:
How? Does Corona get absorbed by the skin on your hands?
Posted on 4/13/20 at 11:39 am to cable
quote:
How? Does Corona get absorbed by the skin on your hands?
I'm not talking about just Corona , I'm talking about since the beginning of gloves they have been meant to protect the wearer's hands. They do not add any benefit to someone for instance eating a sandwich made by someone wearing gloves. As far as Corona goes they protect the user's hands from accumulating germs as they touch shite, but the gloves continue to pollute shite they touch, as ungloved hands would, which is given to customers.
ETA: Here is an example:
Cover your body in wet red paint from head to toe, let this represent your cooties. Now, grab a pair of gloves out of the box, put them on and strat performing a task. Let me know how long it takes the gloves to be completely covered with red paint, i.e. your cooties.
Now, cover a bunch of canned goods in red paint, put on a pair of gloves and starting acting like a cashier at the grocery store. Notice when you take the gloves off the paint goes with them and your hands are clean.
This post was edited on 4/13/20 at 11:45 am
Posted on 4/13/20 at 11:52 am to Fat Batman
And if you touch your face you still get red paint/cooties on you own face - gloves or no gloves. The only way a pair of gloves offers protection is if this virus is absorbed by the skin or the gloves are changed after every interaction. Otherwise, gloves are pointless.
Posted on 4/13/20 at 12:11 pm to cable
I'm not advocating using gloves to protect against the virus. Did you read my initial post? My point is that they are a visual feel good for customers which is stupid because the only benefit is provided to the user in providing an easily removable barrier between the users hands and whatever they are touching.
Posted on 4/13/20 at 12:20 pm to cable
Gloves are worse than bare hands bc some of these people are wearing the same gloves the whole shift. They would need to be changing frequently and washing their hands every time they changed gloves to be effective
I saw a customer pitching a fit bc employees weren’t using gloves to make their food. They were using tongs though, which is way more sanitary
I saw a customer pitching a fit bc employees weren’t using gloves to make their food. They were using tongs though, which is way more sanitary
Posted on 4/13/20 at 1:46 pm to GynoSandberg
quote:
Gloves are worse than bare hands bc some of these people are wearing the same gloves the whole shift. They would need to be changing frequently and washing their hands every time they changed gloves to be effective
Agree with this 100%, and there have been several studies that document exactly what is described above. Wearing gloves blunts the kitchen worker’s sense of “dirty hands” and often leads them to touch more things with the same gloves than they would with bare hands. If you just touched raw meat, you’re gonna feel that on bare hands, and likely will wash before moving to the next task. Gloves must me changed constantly to be an effective barrier.
Masks are a different thing: those can serve to protect kitchen workers from each other. Kitchens aren’t conducive to effective social distancing, and they’re often hot, leading to sweating. which can lead to wiping of brows and other facial touching. It it only takes one asymptomatic virus shedder to fell an entire crew. The mask isn’t doing much to protect a takeout/pickup customer who has brief contact—they’re protecting employees from each other.
Popular
Back to top
2







