- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Is stock more important than roux for gumbo?
Posted on 5/22/19 at 5:06 pm to Powerman
Posted on 5/22/19 at 5:06 pm to Powerman
quote:Interesting. The smokiness of the smoked hen combined with the drippings seasoning and basting it in the smoker add a little lagniappe to the broth. I'll try the roasting next time and see how that does.
I've found that if you roast the vegetables and chicken bones in the oven before putting into your stock you get a better result
Posted on 5/22/19 at 7:42 pm to Gris Gris
quote:
I’ve only added roux to stock for gumbo my entire life, but it works both ways.
I’ve had stock to roux gumbos separate because the stock cools down too much when going into the roux. Stock boiling helps the roux “explode” as it’s slowly being added in.
...right? Because I just sent a recipe to my coworkers saying to add roux that’s been off the heat to a boiling stock.
Posted on 5/22/19 at 7:55 pm to Masterag
I'd bet dollars to donuts NOBODY could tell if you added the stock to your roux or the roux to your stock in the final product.
To me, it's six of one, half dozen of the other and I've done it both ways and it all tastes the same in the end.
To me, it's six of one, half dozen of the other and I've done it both ways and it all tastes the same in the end.
Posted on 5/23/19 at 11:23 am to SUB
quote:
The title of this thread is misleading and you should change it. Lots of people have questions on how to mix roux and stock (hot vs cold / cooled). It seems you are just asking about people's opinions on how important a good stock is or how to make a good stock.
well, i'm kind of asking both, actually. but you make a good point.
Posted on 5/23/19 at 11:26 am to lsupride87
quote:
Wait, I thought this thread was about using homemade stock? OP was kind of all over the place
well, i was trying to kill two birds with one stone and apparently it didn't work out too well
Posted on 5/23/19 at 12:50 pm to Masterag
(no message)
This post was edited on 10/12/22 at 7:22 am
Posted on 5/23/19 at 1:22 pm to Masterag
In answer to your stock v roux question, I think roux rules (in certain gumbos) and here's why.
A light roux doesn't do it for me no matter how good your stock is.
I've had plenty of gumbos made with water which were delicious. If you use good smoked chicken or turkey and good smoked sausage/andouille, you will have plenty of flavor even without a stock. In fact sometimes making a stock with the smoked bones can be a bit overpowering when the meats have strong smoke flavor.
If you're adding raw chicken to simmer and cook in the gumbo, you're going to get some decent broth flavor in the gumbo, as well.
Paul Prudhomme's fried chicken and andouille gumbo recipe calls for water and that's how I made it initially. It was delicious. Later on, I started simmering the bones from the fried chicken in store bought stock to add more of the fried flavor as well as flavor from the bones. This enhanced it a bit. Good sausage and that fried chicken flavor plays into the gumbo in place of a strong stock.
Now, in a seafood gumbo, I think the roux and stock are important. You really need that seafood stock for the flavor. Seafood cooks quickly and doesn't impart that much in the way of contributing to the liquid in the gumbo. Stock is required in my opinion.
A light roux doesn't do it for me no matter how good your stock is.
I've had plenty of gumbos made with water which were delicious. If you use good smoked chicken or turkey and good smoked sausage/andouille, you will have plenty of flavor even without a stock. In fact sometimes making a stock with the smoked bones can be a bit overpowering when the meats have strong smoke flavor.
If you're adding raw chicken to simmer and cook in the gumbo, you're going to get some decent broth flavor in the gumbo, as well.
Paul Prudhomme's fried chicken and andouille gumbo recipe calls for water and that's how I made it initially. It was delicious. Later on, I started simmering the bones from the fried chicken in store bought stock to add more of the fried flavor as well as flavor from the bones. This enhanced it a bit. Good sausage and that fried chicken flavor plays into the gumbo in place of a strong stock.
Now, in a seafood gumbo, I think the roux and stock are important. You really need that seafood stock for the flavor. Seafood cooks quickly and doesn't impart that much in the way of contributing to the liquid in the gumbo. Stock is required in my opinion.
Posted on 5/23/19 at 1:25 pm to Gris Gris
quote:
Paul Prudhomme's fried chicken and andouille gumbo recipe calls for water
I do not believe you have this right. Any time I've seen it it calls for stock.
Posted on 5/23/19 at 1:33 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
I do not believe you have this right. Any time I've seen it it calls for stock.
I believe the later versions online do call for stock. I think the original in the first cookbook says water, but I can't put my hands on mine right now. Someone else can correct me if I've misposted.
Here's the recipe on his current website with the magic seasonings.
LINK
quote:
7 cups chicken stock or water
I checked the cookbook and it does say chicken stock. It references a chicken stock recipe in the book. Way back when, I used water.
This post was edited on 5/23/19 at 7:17 pm
Popular
Back to top


0






