Started By
Message

re: Freakonomics podcast on expensive wines: you're all full of s$%&

Posted on 10/20/11 at 3:17 pm to
Posted by Tiger JJ
Member since Aug 2010
545 posts
Posted on 10/20/11 at 3:17 pm to
quote:

If this was an insane statement then wine experts would have a very very good track record of being able to tell the difference in a blind taste test. It seems however that they do not.
Posted by Tiger JJ
Member since Aug 2010
545 posts
Posted on 10/20/11 at 3:18 pm to
quote:

You are being ticky tack with my response. Just because I threw the number 15 out there, you know I'm not talking about 14 vs 16. Come on. Don't be like that. That's stupid.


I intentionally widened the spread around $15 (12 vs 18) so that you wouldn't cop out like you ended up doing anyway. the $18 bottle is 50% more expensive than the other one.

quote:

Never said I was an expert by the way.


Fine, you said you could "tell the difference". And you can't.
Posted by Panny Crickets
Fort Worth, TX
Member since Sep 2008
5596 posts
Posted on 10/20/11 at 3:19 pm to
Beer snobs are for more worser. Quite the vocal bunch.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
170613 posts
Posted on 10/20/11 at 3:19 pm to
I'm definitely not as hard core as JT on this issue

I do think that the power of persuasion does play a very strong role though

And the differences in quality if they exist at all are probably smaller from one price range to the other than some might like to admit.

Is the 15 dollar bottle better than the 7 dollar bottle? Perhaps. But I doubt there is a huge difference. Same going from 15-40, 40-80 etc.. Is there a difference between a 2 dollar bottle from South Africa that you get free with a Keg at a gas station and a 15K bottle of wine from Spain? I'd say that the answer is probably a very obvious yes.
Posted by tetu
Ascension Parish
Member since Jan 2011
12269 posts
Posted on 10/20/11 at 3:21 pm to
quote:

If this was an insane statement then wine experts would have a very very good track record of being able to tell the difference in a blind taste test. It seems however that they do not.


Like I said in another post, if you are comparing a 1 year old $20 california pinot noir table wine that was made with a fruit forward taste and meant to drink young with a 1 year old $80 burgandy pinot noir that isn't made with the sweetness upfront, and was meant to age 25 years...then yeah the cheap wine will taste as good or even better.
Posted by kkille1lsu
New Orleans, LA
Member since Nov 2005
1093 posts
Posted on 10/20/11 at 3:22 pm to
I think one of the problems is the assumption that $15-20 is not a good to very good wine. Just like many have said before, $85 wine does not make it excellent. It may be expensive due to marketing or overhead.

Posted by tetu
Ascension Parish
Member since Jan 2011
12269 posts
Posted on 10/20/11 at 3:23 pm to
quote:

Is the 15 dollar bottle better than the 7 dollar bottle? Perhaps. But I doubt there is a huge difference. Same going from 15-40, 40-80 etc..


I noted onthis earlier. My favorite barolo is $80 and my favorite malbec is $20. The barolo is better, but not 4x better
Posted by kfizzle85
Member since Dec 2005
22022 posts
Posted on 10/20/11 at 3:24 pm to
quote:

Is the 15 dollar bottle better than the 7 dollar bottle? Perhaps. But I doubt there is a huge difference. Same going from 15-40, 40-80 etc.. Is there a difference between a 2 dollar bottle from South Africa that you get free with a Keg at a gas station and a 15K bottle of wine from Spain? I'd say that the answer is probably a very obvious yes.


Well to be quite frank and not purposefully argumentative but actually contribute a thought to this discussion, I personally think its the exact opposite. I admit to never having a 15k bottle of wine though.
Posted by tetu
Ascension Parish
Member since Jan 2011
12269 posts
Posted on 10/20/11 at 3:25 pm to
quote:

since it's the cheap shite why bother with serving it at the correct temperature or letting it breathe.


Putting a young wine through a diffuser makes a world of difference. Aerating an older wine doesn't give as much of a noticeable change to me.
Posted by tetu
Ascension Parish
Member since Jan 2011
12269 posts
Posted on 10/20/11 at 3:27 pm to
quote:

It may be expensive due to marketing or overhead.


Bud Light must be doing something wrong.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
170613 posts
Posted on 10/20/11 at 3:27 pm to
quote:


Well to be quite frank and not purposefully argumentative but actually contribute a thought to this discussion, I personally think its the exact opposite. I admit to never having a 15k bottle of wine though.


I'm not even sure what you were trying to say

You think that there is a huge gap in quality between each price range?

quote:

I admit to never having a 15k bottle of wine though.


Posted by Cold Cous Cous
Bucktown, La.
Member since Oct 2003
15344 posts
Posted on 10/20/11 at 3:28 pm to
Man this argument has been posted 100 times. As they'd say on the rant, "Riesling."
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
170613 posts
Posted on 10/20/11 at 3:29 pm to
quote:

It may be expensive due to marketing or overhead.


Seems more likely it's driven by demand. Just like everything else. There is a demand for expensive wine regardless of quality.

I'm sure there are plenty of rich people that quietly admit to themselves that they don't see the big fricking deal about the 200 dollar bottles of wine they serve to their rich friends but they probably wouldn't say it out loud, lest they be judged by some pretentious notion that they have an inferior palate.
Posted by Tiger JJ
Member since Aug 2010
545 posts
Posted on 10/20/11 at 3:30 pm to
quote:

Putting a young wine through a diffuser makes a world of difference. Aerating an older wine doesn't give as much of a noticeable change to me.




See, this is the kind of shite that is in your head. And I've also noticed that people failing taste tests ALWAYS fall back on bullshite like this - oh, well, it wasn't properly decanted; otherwise I would have been able to tell the difference.

I really would love to see how many of you would label the same wine as different in a blind lineup. IMO, if you do that even once, then you have no credibility whatsoever.
Posted by tetu
Ascension Parish
Member since Jan 2011
12269 posts
Posted on 10/20/11 at 3:30 pm to
quote:

a great beer is much harder to make than a great wine.


I love beer, but outside of a few styles (lambic/gueuze) wine is much more difficult to produce.
Posted by tetu
Ascension Parish
Member since Jan 2011
12269 posts
Posted on 10/20/11 at 3:31 pm to
quote:

I really would love to see how many of you would label the same wine as different in a blind lineup

If it was a young wine and one glass was decanted while the other wasnt, id prob say it was different. How could I not respond with that
This post was edited on 10/20/11 at 3:33 pm
Posted by tetu
Ascension Parish
Member since Jan 2011
12269 posts
Posted on 10/20/11 at 3:32 pm to
Posted by Winkface
Member since Jul 2010
34377 posts
Posted on 10/20/11 at 3:32 pm to
quote:

the $18 bottle is 50% more expensive than the other one.

Congrats. You can do math.

quote:

And you can't.
Yes I can.
Posted by GeauxldMember
Member since Nov 2003
5483 posts
Posted on 10/20/11 at 3:33 pm to
quote:

locally grown Arkansas wine. That shite was gross.


They probably made it from fermented dingleberries...

As to the topic, this argument could be made for lots of things outside of wine. State of mind has a lot to do with life's small pleasures, I'll admit. When I was in Tuscany, the wine tasted better! I know lots of people who will swear a meal was fantastic just because it was in a high end restaurant and they paid through the nose for it.

I'll whole-heartedly agree that there are some very fine, inexpensive wines out there, and that lots of wine is overpriced, but if someone tells me I'm going to prefer a $60 bottle of Pinot in most case over a $12 bottle purely because my mind wants the higher priced bottle to taste better, I'm calling bullshite.
Posted by kfizzle85
Member since Dec 2005
22022 posts
Posted on 10/20/11 at 3:33 pm to
quote:

You think that there is a huge gap in quality between each price range?


That I don't think the difference between a $200 bottle of wine and a $15k bottle of wine is as large as the difference between a $4 bottle of wine and a $13.99 bottle of wine. I don't think they're all on the same proportionate dollar scale or a normalized distribution at all.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram