Started By
Message

re: Freakonomics podcast on expensive wines: you're all full of s$%&

Posted on 10/20/11 at 2:50 pm to
Posted by tetu
Ascension Parish
Member since Jan 2011
12269 posts
Posted on 10/20/11 at 2:50 pm to
I hope they're drinking them at their peaks.

Comparing a 4 or 5 year old Bordeaux that is meant to age 25+ years isn't really fair when comparing to a table wine that is mean to be drank immediatly.
Posted by tetu
Ascension Parish
Member since Jan 2011
12269 posts
Posted on 10/20/11 at 2:53 pm to
quote:

I think you severely underestimate the power of suggestion

You think the cheap stuff doesn't taste as good because your mind is telling you before you even take a sip that it must not taste as good. Same with the more expensive wines.


I don't buy the wine, so I have no idea what the prices are when I'm drinking them. I've found my favorite two wines. One turned out to be $80 and the other turned out to be somewhere around $150.

That being said, I've drank lots of expensive wine that isn't worth the extra money. Also, that $150 bottle isn't 8x better than my favorite $20 malbec.
Posted by notiger1997
Metairie
Member since May 2009
61276 posts
Posted on 10/20/11 at 2:54 pm to
quote:

they personally have a more refined palate and anyone who is skeptical is just not as refined.


I have no problem admitting that I don't have a refined palate. It pisses me off when I go to wine tastings and I'm listening to people explain the different flavor profiles they are getting and I really don't get it.
That is why I rarely buy bottles that cost more than $20. Just a waste at that point probably.
Posted by kfizzle85
Member since Dec 2005
22022 posts
Posted on 10/20/11 at 2:56 pm to
I mean, I can't tell the difference between Reddog and St Arnold's. Its the same thing right? Totally in your head and not the ingredients. Buncha sheep up in here.
This post was edited on 10/20/11 at 2:56 pm
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
170613 posts
Posted on 10/20/11 at 2:57 pm to
I'm no expert on this issue but I'll bring forth a couple of points as to why I think people think that more expensive wine is better.

1. When are you really drinking cheap wine? Probably at a lower end restaurant where the food isn't as memorable. I think the food compliments the wine as much as the wine compliments the food.

2. Do people give the same care to cheap wine that they do to expensive wine? If you came to my house, I'd probably have some pretty cheap wine to offer. I'm also not much of a wine enthusiast and what the hell, since it's the cheap shite why bother with serving it at the correct temperature or letting it breathe.

On the other hand if you go to someone's house that has a lot of more expensive wine, they're probably more likely to treat it with proper care. Serve it at the right temperature, let it breathe, etc..

Also you're probably in a different mental state when you consume cheap vs. expensive. Expensive might be reserved for more special occasions when you're already happy for whatever other reason. Cheap is a tuesday night when you don't feel like breaking the bank.

A lot of different factors that can go into such a thing that might cause an otherwise intelligent person to commit it to memory as being of better quality.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
170613 posts
Posted on 10/20/11 at 2:59 pm to
quote:

I mean, I can't tell the difference between Reddog and St Arnold's. Its the same thing right? Totally in your head and not the ingredients. Buncha sheep up in here.


You're comparing apples to oranges though

Does St. Arnolds even make an American style lager? I assume they do but what sort of idiot drinks lager anyway?
Posted by Winkface
Member since Jul 2010
34377 posts
Posted on 10/20/11 at 3:00 pm to
quote:

And I think it's pretty ironic that in such a thread people are kicking toddlers out of the way to rush to the front of the line and say that they personally have a more refined palate and anyone who is skeptical is just not as refined.
I didn't say anything about having a refined palate. Sommeliers and wine professionals have refined palates, not me.

For me, it has more to do with exposure. Once you have been exposed to better tasting wines (which tend to be more expensive), you know the difference between that and a gas station wine.
Posted by Ole Geauxt
KnowLa.
Member since Dec 2007
50880 posts
Posted on 10/20/11 at 3:03 pm to
you grape juice sippers fighting in here?
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
170613 posts
Posted on 10/20/11 at 3:05 pm to
quote:

you know the difference between that and a gas station wine.


On a somewhat related note, when I was driving through Kansas there was actually a gas station where you could do a wine tasting of their locally grown wines...they had some old guy that looked like Willie Nelson painted on the side of the gas station.

I'll see if I can find a pic I took of it and post it
Posted by Winkface
Member since Jul 2010
34377 posts
Posted on 10/20/11 at 3:06 pm to
quote:

you grape juice sippers fighting in here?
yup, and so far the two people that say we all fall victim to the powers of suggestion have admitted that they aren't even into wine that much. Fascinating, I tell ya.
Posted by Winkface
Member since Jul 2010
34377 posts
Posted on 10/20/11 at 3:07 pm to
quote:

I was driving through Kansas there was actually a gas station where you could do a wine tasting of their locally grown wines.
It wasn't a gas station but I went to a tasting of locally grown Arkansas wine. That shite was gross.
Posted by tetu
Ascension Parish
Member since Jan 2011
12269 posts
Posted on 10/20/11 at 3:08 pm to
quote:

1. When are you really drinking cheap wine? Probably at a lower end restaurant where the food isn't as memorable.

I never drink wine at restaurants unless its been brought there by someone at the table.


quote:

Do people give the same care to cheap wine that they do to expensive wine?

I have some experience with the two. My father loves wine, but he goes out of his way to find the best wines at under $40. I've had great Malbecs for $15-25. My FIL loves wine, but buys the best regardless of price. He loves tasting and I only wish I could have a palate like him. He does blind tastings where people bring their wines in beer bottles, ziploc's etc so no hint about the wine is given away. From himm, I've had a great Barolo that goes for about $45/bottle, but the best Barolo I've had is about $80/bottle. Not worth the extra $35 to me, but it is much smoother.

I've had the best of both worlds, and if it's my money I'm taking the $20 malbec over the $80 barolo. While the barolo is better, it isn't 4x better than a good malbec.

The most noticeable difference to me is with champagne. More expensive is just better, and like i said, I had no idea about the price before I tried them.
Posted by Ole Geauxt
KnowLa.
Member since Dec 2007
50880 posts
Posted on 10/20/11 at 3:09 pm to
quote:

Arkansas wine. That shite was gross.
The name Pine Bluff Gardens, didn't give you a hint?
Posted by kfizzle85
Member since Dec 2005
22022 posts
Posted on 10/20/11 at 3:09 pm to
No way man, its just the price difference. If they didn't tell you BEFORE you drank it, you wouldn't even know they were two different styles of beer. Its all in your head, you said it yourself.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
170613 posts
Posted on 10/20/11 at 3:09 pm to
quote:

My FIL loves wine, but buys the best regardless of price. He loves tasting and I only wish I could have a palate like him.

Why would you wish this upon yourself? Don't like having money?
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
170613 posts
Posted on 10/20/11 at 3:12 pm to
quote:

No way man, its just the price difference. If they didn't tell you BEFORE you drank it, you wouldn't even know they were two different styles of beer. Its all in your head, you said it yourself.


I didn't say that. I was assuming for the wine comparisons that they were at least comparing between the same styles.

Is this not the case?
Posted by tetu
Ascension Parish
Member since Jan 2011
12269 posts
Posted on 10/20/11 at 3:12 pm to
quote:

yup, and so far the two people that say we all fall victim to the powers of suggestion have admitted that they aren't even into wine that much. Fascinating, I tell ya.


I'm defending the grape juice and I'm not that into wine, I think beer is more complex, I know that beer is better with food for pairing, and beer a much better palate cleanser. I think the power of suggestion may work for the mass pop, and you should't share an expensive wine at parties b/c most people cant tell the difference and don't care. But saying that most $20 bottles are in the same league as $80+ bottles is insane.

(I say most, b/c there are some shite wines that are expensive and some less exp bottles that are fantastic.)
Posted by tetu
Ascension Parish
Member since Jan 2011
12269 posts
Posted on 10/20/11 at 3:14 pm to
quote:

Why would you wish this upon yourself? Don't like having money?


, we'll have plenty of money selling off the stock in his 9,000 bottle cellar. He has some wines that have been in there for close to 20 years.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
170613 posts
Posted on 10/20/11 at 3:14 pm to
quote:

But saying that most $20 bottles are in the same league as $80+ bottles is insane.


If this was an insane statement then wine experts would have a very very good track record of being able to tell the difference in a blind taste test. It seems however that they do not.
Posted by kfizzle85
Member since Dec 2005
22022 posts
Posted on 10/20/11 at 3:16 pm to
I have no idea, I'm just playing devil's advocate to you and JT because you'll argue literally for forever. eta: Also, I'm feeling especially lazy and this is helping my procrastinate like a champ right now.
This post was edited on 10/20/11 at 3:18 pm
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram