- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: we vetoed this trade today...
Posted on 9/21/15 at 11:31 am to DallasTiger45
Posted on 9/21/15 at 11:31 am to DallasTiger45
quote:
LOL at the "must be collusion to veto" crowd
We can say "must be collusion to veto" b/c we would never be in a league with these types of morons making terrible, lop-sided trades.
1
Posted on 9/21/15 at 11:38 am to AubieALUMdvm
Sure. I've had commish veto power in a league with hometown friends for like 4 years now...I don't think I've vetoed a trade yet. But obviously this guy is in a league with such a moron, and I think vetoing is preferable to just letting it happen
Posted on 9/21/15 at 11:41 am to TigerTatorTots
quote:
I don't care if a kicker was traded for Lynch...if there is no collusion, a trade should never be vetoed. Let the shitty manager learn from his mistakes.
frick that. I'm not in the business of wasting a fantasy season to teach an idiot a lesson.
Posted on 9/21/15 at 11:44 am to PhiTiger1764
If it were week 8 and one team was out of the playoff picture, then yes, maybe you could veto it. It's only week two. Lynch hasn't lit the world on fire. Let the trade go thru.
Posted on 9/21/15 at 11:49 am to Gtothemoney
Because it is early in the season, and because of how the first 2 weeks have played out, Terrance Williams is borderline. And because I have any pause at all, I think ultimately I would let it go through.
A kicker, however, is a no brainer immediate veto.
A kicker, however, is a no brainer immediate veto.
Posted on 9/21/15 at 11:50 am to AubieALUMdvm
quote:
You hurt your league by doing this. If I were in it I wouldn't come back after this season.
You hurt the league by vetoing, but you'd quit? How is quitting not hurting the league?
Posted on 9/21/15 at 12:09 pm to Westlakeguy10
quote:
Are we wrong for vetoing
Yes. Stop being a pussy
Posted on 9/21/15 at 12:10 pm to DallasTiger45
quote:
just never veto anything
Pretty much. If I play with people I suspect are cheating, I won't play with them again.
Posted on 9/21/15 at 12:17 pm to LSUfan4444
If its serious enough to "not play with someone again", I'd think it's serious enough to fix in real time. Then don't play with them again.
Posted on 9/21/15 at 12:32 pm to Westlakeguy10
Chicken shite move
Posted on 9/21/15 at 12:36 pm to Lester Earl
I always revert back to the league constitution. If the bylaws say a trade can be vetoed simply because people in the league don't like it, then you have no recourse and have to go with what the bylaws say. But if the bylaws insinuate something fishy should be going on rather than stupidity then the trade should stand.
I don't have any issues with vetoing trades when collusion or cheating is likely.
I don't have any issues with vetoing trades when collusion or cheating is likely.
Posted on 9/21/15 at 1:35 pm to Westlakeguy10
quote:
Are we wrong for vetoing for the sake of the league.
Yes. You are wrong. Invoking "the sake of the league" does not make your cause more righteous.
Williams has more fantasy points through two games than Lynch.
When Chip Kelly shipped Foles to the Rams for Bradford, no one vetoed that even though it was obviously insane.
You thinking that you know more than the team who wants Williams is what is wrong. Veto power was never intended to allow the league to crowd manage individual teams.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News