- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 9/13/18 at 10:01 am to Mr. Wayne
quote:
He turned down Hyde for Ingram and then accepted AP for a top 3 player.
Use AP for 3 weeks until Ingram gets back.
Posted on 9/13/18 at 10:02 am to noonan
quote:
What's the problem with that? I wouldn't give up Ingram for Hyde either.
But you would give up Bell for AP? I wish you played in my league.
Posted on 9/13/18 at 10:03 am to Mr. Wayne
quote:
He turned down Hyde for Ingram
Again, what's the problem with that?
quote:
If Bell reports tomorrow and AP gets hurt, very likely, the next day?
What?
Posted on 9/13/18 at 10:03 am to Mr. Wayne
I wouldn't play in your league - its not your job to manage people's teams. They gave you a legit reason for the trade - you have no idea how many games LB is going to play.
Posted on 9/13/18 at 10:03 am to Mr. Wayne
quote:
But you would give up Bell for AP?
Personally no. But that doesn't mean it's a bad pay for that guy.
Posted on 9/13/18 at 10:04 am to Mr. Wayne
quote:
Funny thing is he refused a trade from another manager where he would give up Mark Ingram and get Carlos Hyde... against the Saints this week...
Why would he make that trade anyway? Hyde isn't bad but Ingram is a stud compared to him. Why would you trade away RB1 stud permanently for an RB2/3 just because Hyde has a good matchup this week?
Posted on 9/13/18 at 10:05 am to Mr. Wayne
quote:
Those of you against how would any trade get vetoed if you have to "prove" collusion? Hire a private eye or attain a subpoena for their text and email records? Everyone would be making side deals if this was the standard. He turned down Hyde for Ingram and then accepted AP for a top 3 player.
If Bell reports tomorrow and AP gets hurt, very likely, the next day?
"Oops our bad..."
you can't use you're own speculation as a reason to veto a trade - its just as valid as the other persons speculation.
This some bullshite, you can't use you're own speculation as a reason to veto a trade - its just as valid as the other persons speculation.
Posted on 9/13/18 at 10:05 am to 21JumpStreet
quote:
Use AP for 3 weeks until Ingram gets back.
Then you have AP and Ingram as opposed to Ingram and Bell or Bell and Hyde. Is everyone really on the AP sauce after 1 week? Maybe I misjudged this one.
Posted on 9/13/18 at 10:07 am to Mr. Wayne
There is another thread about the same trade on the board - so unless yall are in the same league, it seems that this trade is viewed as generally fair.
Posted on 9/13/18 at 10:09 am to Mr. Wayne
He might not have Bell at all. I really don't understand why you have a problem with this trade.
The guy with Bell needs a running back. The guy with AP is good and is hoping to score later if Bell comes back. Both are taking a chance to help their teams.
I've got Bell in one league, but it's a dynasty league so I'll have him next year too. But if I was in a redraft league and had no running back I'd definitely be willing to deal.
The guy with Bell needs a running back. The guy with AP is good and is hoping to score later if Bell comes back. Both are taking a chance to help their teams.
I've got Bell in one league, but it's a dynasty league so I'll have him next year too. But if I was in a redraft league and had no running back I'd definitely be willing to deal.
This post was edited on 9/13/18 at 10:11 am
Posted on 9/13/18 at 10:10 am to Mr. Wayne
They guy lost his first round pick and is trying to salvage some sort of value from it by picking up Peterson, the overall RB 8 right now in PPR. If Bell were coming back this week or next week I think most people would agree with you. But notice, while your league voted 9-3 against the trade, you currently have 11 downvotes in this thread which is comprised of people that don't have any real skin in your league. I don't think anyone can say at this point that Bell is coming back before week 10. If that's true, I think the current Bell owner would get the better of this trade.
Posted on 9/13/18 at 10:12 am to Stevo1856
quote:
Feel like you have to let this go through.
quote:
if you can’t prove they are cheating then it’s gotta stand.
Posted on 9/13/18 at 10:12 am to Mr. Wayne
What don’t you understand about the fact that it is reasonable to speculate that Bell won’t be back until week10?
Posted on 9/13/18 at 10:12 am to Mr. Wayne
quote:
Then you have AP and Ingram as opposed to Ingram and Bell or Bell and Hyde. Is everyone really on the AP sauce after 1 week? Maybe I misjudged this one.
Like everyone has been saying. That's his/her decision to have not yours. He liked what he saw from AP. Does not like the Bell situation.
Posted on 9/13/18 at 10:14 am to tigerskin
quote:
What don’t you understand about the fact that it is reasonable to speculate that Bell won’t be back until week10?
I was told speculation isn't allowed in determining if this is fair or not.
Posted on 9/13/18 at 10:15 am to Mr. Wayne
I chose the wrong word. It is at least a 50/50 chance
Posted on 9/13/18 at 10:16 am to Nonetheless
quote:
Allow it. Bell isn't playing and there are no guarantees he does.
This.
Posted on 9/13/18 at 10:17 am to Mr. Wayne
Can you explain why this is an unfair trade without assuming Bell will be back next week?
- If not, I don't see how you can veto it.
- If not, I don't see how you can veto it.
This post was edited on 9/13/18 at 10:18 am
Posted on 9/13/18 at 10:18 am to Mr. Wayne
No one is likely colluding after week one.
You can’t veto trades based on hypotheticals you’ve made up in your head.
Would I make the trade? Nope. But as others have said, it’s not your job to manage his team. Sounds like the owner wants to trade AP’s known workload for the unknown of the Bell situation. Short sighted maybe but justifiable.
quote:
If Bell reports tomorrow and AP gets hurt, very likely, the next day?
You can’t veto trades based on hypotheticals you’ve made up in your head.
Would I make the trade? Nope. But as others have said, it’s not your job to manage his team. Sounds like the owner wants to trade AP’s known workload for the unknown of the Bell situation. Short sighted maybe but justifiable.
Page 2 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News