Started By
Message

Trade Advice: Lockett for D Watson

Posted on 9/12/19 at 9:27 pm
Posted by ItzGeauxTime
DTB
Member since Sep 2013
228 posts
Posted on 9/12/19 at 9:27 pm
Current Roster: (PPR)
RB1 Conner
RB2 D. Freeman
WR1 Hopkins
WR2 Cooper
TE Kelce
Current Flex: Lockett

Bench: RB’s L Murray, R Freeman
J Samuels , I Smith ( both handcuffs)
WR: T. mcLauren, Curtis Samuel

Currently streaming QB’s: Josh Allen

Should I trade Lockett for D Watson to not only have a solid QB, but to also have that D Hop connection?
Posted by LSUvegasbombed
Red Stick
Member since Sep 2013
15464 posts
Posted on 9/12/19 at 9:29 pm to
Who would even take that trade
Posted by jkylejohnson
Alexandria
Member since Dec 2016
13986 posts
Posted on 9/12/19 at 9:31 pm to
Yep. Take that with the quickness.
Posted by ItzGeauxTime
DTB
Member since Sep 2013
228 posts
Posted on 9/12/19 at 9:32 pm to
The guy’s starting WR are T. Boyd, S. Shepard (out this week) and flex is M Brown (Q)

Only bench receiver is Ridley

Plus his other QB is Tom Brady
Posted by TigerLunatik
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jan 2005
93643 posts
Posted on 9/12/19 at 9:34 pm to
This seems like more of a brag than asking for advice.
Posted by ItzGeauxTime
DTB
Member since Sep 2013
228 posts
Posted on 9/12/19 at 9:36 pm to
Not bragging at all. I just don’t see much value in QB’s but I was curious as to y’all thoughts with this particular situation.
Posted by Jumbo_Gumbo
Denham Springs
Member since Dec 2015
5691 posts
Posted on 9/12/19 at 9:37 pm to
Hell no
Posted by dafif5
Member since Nov 2012
629 posts
Posted on 9/12/19 at 9:45 pm to
I hope that shite gets vetoed just for the fact that you started this thread.
Posted by castorinho
13623 posts
Member since Nov 2010
82010 posts
Posted on 9/12/19 at 9:46 pm to
I'd make the trade, I don't think it's that lopsided at all.

Yeah you shore up your QB position, and slide Murray in that flex spot. But you lose an asset you could use to shore up the RB2 hole.
Posted by GynoSandberg
Member since Jan 2006
71957 posts
Posted on 9/12/19 at 9:48 pm to
The dude said he’d trade watson for Lockett ?
Posted by ItzGeauxTime
DTB
Member since Sep 2013
228 posts
Posted on 9/12/19 at 9:53 pm to
We go by a trade value chart which shows them evenly values, so no veto will occur.

It’s a simple fantasy football question on a message board. No need to get flustered!
Posted by ItzGeauxTime
DTB
Member since Sep 2013
228 posts
Posted on 9/12/19 at 9:57 pm to
He is in need of a WR and we go by a trade value chart to determine value and fairness of trades. Cooper is to high and my other WR to low.

Plus he’s not left w/o a QB. He also has Brady on his Roster.
This post was edited on 9/12/19 at 10:02 pm
Posted by GynoSandberg
Member since Jan 2006
71957 posts
Posted on 9/12/19 at 10:05 pm to
I mean, did the guy agree that he would want Lockett for watson? Or are you considering making the offer
Posted by CBandits82
Lurker since May 2008
Member since May 2012
54024 posts
Posted on 9/12/19 at 10:05 pm to
quote:

He is in need of a WR and we go by a trade value chart to determine value and fairness of trades.


Does the trade have to even out on the chart for it to go through?

That’s brutal IMO.

You mind posting the chart?
Posted by ItzGeauxTime
DTB
Member since Sep 2013
228 posts
Posted on 9/12/19 at 10:07 pm to
We are doing value +/- 5 points.

LINK /
Posted by CBandits82
Lurker since May 2008
Member since May 2012
54024 posts
Posted on 9/12/19 at 10:08 pm to
if I’m giving up Lockett and I’m getting Watson I’m ecstatic.

Did the Watson agree to this?

What does the chart say?
Posted by ItzGeauxTime
DTB
Member since Sep 2013
228 posts
Posted on 9/12/19 at 10:10 pm to
I posted a link to the chart above. It’s the CBS Sports Trade Value and it gets updated weekly.

Watson 15 points in a 1 QB league
And Lockett is 16 points in a PPR
Posted by castorinho
13623 posts
Member since Nov 2010
82010 posts
Posted on 9/12/19 at 10:12 pm to
I didn't even check the charts before I made my comment, but all the charts that I usually double check with pretty much have their values in the same ballpark. Not ridiculous.

Either you guys are overvaluing QBs, or don't think Lockett is a solid WR2.
Posted by CBandits82
Lurker since May 2008
Member since May 2012
54024 posts
Posted on 9/12/19 at 10:13 pm to
take this and run if Watson owner is down.

Regardless of what Dave’s chart says Watson is the best player and piece here.
Posted by CBandits82
Lurker since May 2008
Member since May 2012
54024 posts
Posted on 9/12/19 at 10:17 pm to
It’s not ridiculous at all but I want the Watson side, I’ll trade an efficiency dependent WR in a Shotty run first offense for a highly possible overall QB 2 finish.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram