Started By
Message

re: TDFSB Non-Regulars Fantasy Football League *vote on pending trades*

Posted on 8/23/12 at 12:06 am to
Posted by imAMAZING
Member since Sep 2008
6357 posts
Posted on 8/23/12 at 12:06 am to
It's stupid rotoworld that hyped him up so much, I had to do whatever it took to get him.

According to Fox Sports Southwest's Matt Mosley, Cowboys RB DeMarco Murray has been "the most impressive offensive player to watch in training camp."

According to SI.com's Don Banks, DeMarco Murray looks like "a man among (Cow)boys" in training camp.

Cowboys RBs coach Skip Peete expects DeMarco Murray to rush for at least 1,200 yards and a "bunch" of touchdowns if he stays healthy for 16 games this year.

LINK


How can you not fap to that?

I honestly think I have the best running backs in the league now.
This post was edited on 8/23/12 at 12:09 am
Posted by 21JumpStreet
Member since Jul 2012
14895 posts
Posted on 8/23/12 at 12:08 am to
I don't get how you see at getting raped with in the end me and amazing swapped 2nd and 3rd round picks basically
Posted by JBeam
Guns,Germs & Steel
Member since Jan 2011
68377 posts
Posted on 8/23/12 at 12:08 am to
quote:

Looks to be one of those veto everything leagues.

it's not a veto everything league...

but how does it benefit me?
Posted by 21JumpStreet
Member since Jul 2012
14895 posts
Posted on 8/23/12 at 12:10 am to
Rules of veto is for collusion purposes IMO. If someone likes the trade for them. What gives the other person the right to say NO?
Posted by imAMAZING
Member since Sep 2008
6357 posts
Posted on 8/23/12 at 12:10 am to
It's not supposed to benefit you, it's supposed to benefit the teams involved in the trade
Posted by Tiger1242
Member since Jul 2011
33200 posts
Posted on 8/23/12 at 12:11 am to
Matt Mosley is an idiot. But I think Murray will be awesome, your receivers will just be awful
I'm not vetoing though, it doesn't give anyone an unfair advantage and you both want it
Posted by 21JumpStreet
Member since Jul 2012
14895 posts
Posted on 8/23/12 at 12:11 am to
And how is it hurting you? Are we cheating?
Posted by 21JumpStreet
Member since Jul 2012
14895 posts
Posted on 8/23/12 at 12:12 am to
Tiger I'm like the show barter kings, if y'all have seen it. That's how I treat my leagues
Posted by Tiger1242
Member since Jul 2011
33200 posts
Posted on 8/23/12 at 12:13 am to
quote:

but how does it benefit me?

So you'll only not veto trades you're involved in?
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
290911 posts
Posted on 8/23/12 at 12:14 am to
do you guys want me to settle this?
Posted by JBeam
Guns,Germs & Steel
Member since Jan 2011
68377 posts
Posted on 8/23/12 at 12:14 am to
are we doing divisions or not?
Posted by Tiger1242
Member since Jul 2011
33200 posts
Posted on 8/23/12 at 12:14 am to
quote:

Tiger I'm like the show barter kings, if y'all have seen it. That's how I treat my leagues

Haha good to know; I wonder who I can pick from your team…
Posted by imAMAZING
Member since Sep 2008
6357 posts
Posted on 8/23/12 at 12:17 am to
I don't see why nicks can't be a formidable wideout, he had only 4 less catches and 1 less touchdown than Fitzgerald last year. I mean sure Fitz had 200 more yards but the QB situation still sucks. Torrey Smith can be Baltimore's #1 and I think Santonio Holmes is the only passing option for the Jets although it's Sanchaz. The upgrade at my #2 running back position is worth the minor downgrade at my wideout position. Just my 2 cents.

So does anyone have a wideout for trade?
Posted by 21JumpStreet
Member since Jul 2012
14895 posts
Posted on 8/23/12 at 12:18 am to
1 question. Veto worthy. Yes or No?
Posted by imAMAZING
Member since Sep 2008
6357 posts
Posted on 8/23/12 at 12:18 am to
No divisions
Posted by JBeam
Guns,Germs & Steel
Member since Jan 2011
68377 posts
Posted on 8/23/12 at 12:19 am to
ehh okay...do what yall want.
Posted by Tiger1242
Member since Jul 2011
33200 posts
Posted on 8/23/12 at 12:20 am to
quote:

So does anyone have a wideout for trade?

Maybe for Demarco Murray
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
290911 posts
Posted on 8/23/12 at 12:20 am to
quote:

1 question. Veto worthy. Yes or No?



no. i just assume the guy getting Murray is pretty desperate for a RB

would i do it? No. i assume both Murray and Nicks were drafted after Fitz and Andre Johnson. Why doesnt really make sense.

is it veto worthy? naw
Posted by imAMAZING
Member since Sep 2008
6357 posts
Posted on 8/23/12 at 12:23 am to
That's usually the case I guess. I just don't like putting too much stock on ADPs...I had Murray rated higher than Fitz and Johnson. I just think running backs are harder to come by than wideouts.
This post was edited on 8/23/12 at 12:24 am
Posted by 21JumpStreet
Member since Jul 2012
14895 posts
Posted on 8/23/12 at 12:23 am to
Actually Murray-Andre-Fitz-Nicks was the order being drafted

Jbeam which side is lopsided to you?
first pageprev pagePage 122 of 176Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram