Started By
Message

re: TDFL Week 6: Karma and Rouge suck as owners

Posted on 10/17/11 at 2:28 pm to
Posted by LSUAlum2001
Stavro Mueller Beta
Member since Aug 2003
48570 posts
Posted on 10/17/11 at 2:28 pm to
quote:

not at all. i just haven't really gotten into this league. just isn't grabbing my attention like i had expected. it's not a big deal.


..probably had something to do with you putting your draft on fail-safe after the 6th or so round without a list set up and it drafted you 5 TEs.

It would have been 6 but the commish backed out the 6th TE the league drafted for you and gave you the next highest rated WR.
Posted by PortCityTiger24
Member since Dec 2006
87455 posts
Posted on 10/17/11 at 2:29 pm to
If either of them go another week without setting a full lineup, I could remove their access and set their lineups myself. We'd have to figure out what to do if one of them actually won.
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54755 posts
Posted on 10/17/11 at 2:30 pm to
quote:

So how do we handle it? I would just up and boot them, but i guess a vote would be more politically correct.


I would just boot them to, but this is a league that likes to vote.

As for the money - if a new guy, Louie T, comes in and manages to win some money - he gets a prorated amount and the left over stays in the pot for next year. Something like that.
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54755 posts
Posted on 10/17/11 at 2:30 pm to
quote:

We'd have to figure out what to do if one of them actually won.


If you don't give their teams to anyone then the $$$ stays in the pot for next year.
Posted by PortCityTiger24
Member since Dec 2006
87455 posts
Posted on 10/17/11 at 2:31 pm to
quote:

As for the money - if a new guy, Louie T, comes in and manages to win some money - he gets a prorated amount and the left over stays in the pot for next year. Something like that.


Without paying anything to get in? IDK how that will fly.
Posted by PortCityTiger24
Member since Dec 2006
87455 posts
Posted on 10/17/11 at 2:32 pm to
quote:

If you don't give their teams to anyone then the $$$ stays in the pot for next year.


I think this would probably be the best solution IF we did boot them.

Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54755 posts
Posted on 10/17/11 at 2:32 pm to
OK, good point - if they want in the have to pay a pro-rated amount to get in. But no refunds to the shitty owners getting booted.
This post was edited on 10/17/11 at 2:33 pm
Posted by LSUAlum2001
Stavro Mueller Beta
Member since Aug 2003
48570 posts
Posted on 10/17/11 at 2:33 pm to
quote:

Without paying anything to get in? IDK how that will fly.


Nah.

Let the commish(s) set the lineups.

If the teams win anything, just dump the winnings back into the other winners; broken down by the same percentage.
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
290861 posts
Posted on 10/17/11 at 2:43 pm to
yeah, maybe just set their lineup.
Posted by barry
Location, Location, Location
Member since Aug 2006
51397 posts
Posted on 10/17/11 at 3:57 pm to
quote:

Would be ok if it were just 1 division, but it's kinda unfair to the Tiger division that these 2 suck so bad.


Is it? You aren't getting head to head wins or anything.
Posted by Honkus
Member since Aug 2005
57971 posts
Posted on 10/17/11 at 4:00 pm to
We're basically only competing vs. 9 owners for 6Ws/week, while the tiger conference is goin vs. 11
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
290861 posts
Posted on 10/17/11 at 4:01 pm to
quote:

We're basically only competing vs. 9 owners for 6Ws/week


Posted by reddman
Member since Jul 2005
78195 posts
Posted on 10/17/11 at 4:02 pm to
Posted by Honkus
Member since Aug 2005
57971 posts
Posted on 10/17/11 at 4:04 pm to
Posted by barry
Location, Location, Location
Member since Aug 2006
51397 posts
Posted on 10/17/11 at 4:05 pm to
quote:

We're basically only competing vs. 9 owners for 6Ws/week, while the tiger conference is goin vs. 11


Our league doesn't effect their league what so ever. Its not giving us some kind of advantage. It's random so one league is going to have better owners than the other one. To me this is a non issue.
This post was edited on 10/17/11 at 4:06 pm
Posted by reddman
Member since Jul 2005
78195 posts
Posted on 10/17/11 at 4:06 pm to
It worked for me, honkfrick.

It's a fappy pic.
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
290861 posts
Posted on 10/17/11 at 4:06 pm to
Posted by reddman
Member since Jul 2005
78195 posts
Posted on 10/17/11 at 4:07 pm to
quote:

Our league doesn't effect there league what so ever.


Our league doesn't AFFECT THEIR league WHATSOEVER.

Idiot.

Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
290861 posts
Posted on 10/17/11 at 4:07 pm to
quote:

It's random so one league is going to have better owners than the other one.



but Bare', bad owners are one thing; inactive owners are another. If they are just shitty at fantasy, so be it. If they are inactive, that is a problem.
Posted by barry
Location, Location, Location
Member since Aug 2006
51397 posts
Posted on 10/17/11 at 4:10 pm to
quote:

but Bare', bad owners are one thing; inactive owners are another. If they are just shitty at fantasy, so be it. If they are inactive, that is a problem.


The result is the same, thats all that matters.
I'm not saying karma shouldn't be dealt with, just that the other conference can't really complain about us having him.

Suck my dick redd.
This post was edited on 10/17/11 at 4:12 pm
first pageprev pagePage 36 of 42Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram