- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: TDFL 2016: Droppings Conference Auction This Sunday, 8:00 PM CST
Posted on 6/28/16 at 1:56 pm to OneMoreTime
Posted on 6/28/16 at 1:56 pm to OneMoreTime
Andrew Luck was the issue. I went against my pre draft strategy and he cost me all season.
An extra $3 would not have mattered.
An extra $3 would not have mattered.
This post was edited on 6/28/16 at 1:57 pm
0
Posted on 6/28/16 at 1:58 pm to PortCityTiger24
Sidenote - PCT I sent paypal yesterday afternoon, let me know if received.
Posted on 6/28/16 at 2:00 pm to drizztiger
Yep got it.
Posted on 6/28/16 at 2:03 pm to PortCityTiger24
Posted on 6/28/16 at 3:05 pm to drizztiger
I think rather than eliminating positions (such as a DEF which is an integral part of the game) it might be more interesting to come up with new ways of scoring performance. Similar to what was done in baseball years ago. Is there a better way to measure/score performance?
I think a better way to have dealt with the DEF would have been to eliminate some of the scoring credits it gets. Remove INT, Sacks and fumble recoveries or a couple and get down to what is the defense's core value - stopping scores and limiting yardage. Anyway, just a thought.
I think a better way to have dealt with the DEF would have been to eliminate some of the scoring credits it gets. Remove INT, Sacks and fumble recoveries or a couple and get down to what is the defense's core value - stopping scores and limiting yardage. Anyway, just a thought.
This post was edited on 6/28/16 at 3:06 pm
Posted on 6/28/16 at 3:09 pm to cwill
Scoring based on point per possession and yards per play benchmarks?
Posted on 6/28/16 at 5:28 pm to DallasTiger45
You'd have to flesh that out some more....but it sounds better than no D or Kicker and possibly putting a 2nd QB in the flex.
Posted on 6/28/16 at 5:36 pm to cwill
quote:
possibly putting a 2nd QB in the flex.
It ain't happening.
Posted on 6/28/16 at 5:40 pm to cwill
I was all for the first change, but this is getting too complicated IMO.
I'd almost say lets just keep the shite as is
I'd almost say lets just keep the shite as is
Posted on 6/28/16 at 5:41 pm to TthomasJR
take a deep breath bro
Posted on 6/28/16 at 5:57 pm to TthomasJR
This use to be my favorite league, might not like the league at all with all these changes that are being suggested.
Posted on 6/28/16 at 5:59 pm to Toula
I think I won the league one year by paying $3 for Chicago D. (I may be getting confused with the year I was the #1 or #2 seed and lost in the playoffs).
However, I was all in on Chicago D for $3 and Tony Gonzalez for $2 and had a great team.
However, I was all in on Chicago D for $3 and Tony Gonzalez for $2 and had a great team.
Posted on 6/28/16 at 6:02 pm to TthomasJR
quote:Only thing to happen was DEF/K slots got replaced by a 2nd Flex RB/WR/TE spot. And then a bit of whining and name calling.
I was all for the first change, but this is getting too complicated IMO.
I don't think anyone really cares about K spot, so another option is to vote to re-add DEF (using last years rules) and see what the league says. Then the DEF bidders v. streamers get a re-do on DEFexit.
Posted on 6/28/16 at 6:02 pm to Lester Earl
Don't allow flex for kicker and defense. Flex should be limited to RB WR TE. If I could flex defense, then I would because they tend to wildly out score an RB3 or WR3.
Posted on 6/28/16 at 6:04 pm to PortCityTiger24
quote:
quote:
possibly putting a 2nd QB in the flex.
It ain't happening.
I know, but it was an example of going down the rabbit hole of bad ideas. I think changes to scoring could be interesting. The two proposed so far are not.
Posted on 6/28/16 at 6:21 pm to PortCityTiger24
Just tried to send you the money via PayPal, and it gave me an error message.
"This recipient is currently unable to receive money."
I sent it to the same a________2424@gmail as always. Anything going on your end, Port?
"This recipient is currently unable to receive money."
I sent it to the same a________2424@gmail as always. Anything going on your end, Port?
Posted on 6/28/16 at 6:26 pm to Vicks Kennel Club
The best option would have been just to add a 2nd flex and keep everything else as-is, so those who like to draft a top D/ST and K would have been happy and those who try to find those deep sleepers (or who drafted well and had 2 stud bench players to choose from for the flex positions) would be happy.
Everyone wins.
Everyone wins.
This post was edited on 6/28/16 at 6:28 pm
Posted on 6/29/16 at 9:17 am to LSUAlum2001
quote:
The best option would have been just to add a 2nd flex and keep everything else as-is, so those who like to draft a top D/ST and K would have been happy and those who try to find those deep sleepers (or who drafted well and had 2 stud bench players to choose from for the flex positions) would be happy.
Everyone wins.
No , not really. I wouldn't want an extra flex if we kept kickers or defense.
The change passed in a landslide. Time to move on.
In other news, there will be no QBs in the flex.
New poll posted regarding special team touchdown scores being awarded to players. Vote!
We will have a separate poll regarding yardage.
Posted on 6/29/16 at 9:19 am to Vicks Kennel Club
Yeah, you're not supposed to have two paypals so I had to delete that one. Send it to the one I posted in the email, AM24TDFL @ Gmail.
Posted on 6/29/16 at 9:23 am to PortCityTiger24
Ok thanks. The email said the other one, but I will pay you to the above email sometime today.
Page 15 of 35
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News