- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 1/2/10 at 4:30 pm to rondo
In a minute. I am doing some laundry and shite right now.
Posted on 1/2/10 at 4:36 pm to stout
McCain needs to explain wht he did this trade btw.
Its totally whack
Its totally whack
Posted on 1/2/10 at 5:21 pm to rondo
why is it whack??
pretty irrelevant IMO
pretty irrelevant IMO
Posted on 1/2/10 at 6:00 pm to Lester Earl
What part of Hawes is way better than Speights do you guys not get?
And they play the same position so its not a positional need thing.
And they play the same position so its not a positional need thing.
Posted on 1/2/10 at 6:01 pm to rondo
id take Speights over Hawes actually
didnt know it was so cut and dry
didnt know it was so cut and dry
Posted on 1/2/10 at 6:04 pm to rondo
quote:
And they play the same position so its not a positional need thing.
actually, they don't.
Hawes is C eligible.
Posted on 1/2/10 at 6:06 pm to Lester Earl
And why the frick are there objections to this trade? There is nothing objectionable at all in this.
these are two players. straight up. both are owned in 60% to 70% of leagues. And both have a little bit of upside. similar stats. similar postion. You don't get more even than this.
the people in this league are fricking unbelievable sometimes.
these are two players. straight up. both are owned in 60% to 70% of leagues. And both have a little bit of upside. similar stats. similar postion. You don't get more even than this.
the people in this league are fricking unbelievable sometimes.
This post was edited on 1/2/10 at 6:08 pm
Posted on 1/2/10 at 6:16 pm to rondo
people who object to fair trades are the only crybabies i see.
Posted on 1/2/10 at 6:26 pm to LSU Fan 90812
Hawes gets 30 minutes per and Speights gets 20
The only significant upgrade with Speights is better FG%
There is no reason why McCain should make this trade.
He is out of it and just fed you a player that significantly improves your team...especially since its your thinnest position
The only significant upgrade with Speights is better FG%
There is no reason why McCain should make this trade.
He is out of it and just fed you a player that significantly improves your team...especially since its your thinnest position
Posted on 1/2/10 at 6:26 pm to LSU Fan 90812
quote:
these are two players. straight up. both are owned in 60% to 70% of leagues. And both have a little bit of upside. similar stats. similar postion. You don't get more even than this.
Why did you do the trade?
Posted on 1/2/10 at 7:03 pm to cwill
quote:
Why did you do the trade?
guessing b/c hawes is a c
i don't see what's wrong. hawes isn't a world beater, and speights, imo, has more upside which is why mccain probably did the deal.
This post was edited on 1/2/10 at 7:04 pm
Posted on 1/2/10 at 7:06 pm to PortCityTiger24
McCain wont be keeping Speights...and if so he gave Karma a piece that improves him for nothing IMO.
Posted on 1/2/10 at 7:14 pm to rondo
quote:
McCain wont be keeping Speights...and if so he gave Karma a piece that improves him for nothing IMO.
Exactly - McCain extracted no value. If you are out of it you have to trade for something more than a guy with negligible upside - a non-keeper.
Posted on 1/2/10 at 7:26 pm to PortCityTiger24
Here's a thought - make an offer, one that works.
Posted on 1/2/10 at 7:29 pm to cwill
i did make you an offer and you did nothing with it
Posted on 1/2/10 at 7:36 pm to PortCityTiger24
quote:
i did make you an offer and you did nothing with it
B/c it was Meh.
Popular
Back to top



1





