- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: TD Fantasy: The Auction League | ***OPENINGS AVAILABLE FOR 2015 SEASON**
Posted on 9/23/14 at 5:04 pm to drizztiger
Posted on 9/23/14 at 5:04 pm to drizztiger
I sent you some trades in the Last Chance league.
Posted on 9/23/14 at 5:08 pm to drizztiger
If I could take it back now, I would have kept Cooks out of it. I wasn't high on him after mid season, but I feel like I made a HUGE mistake. I guess we live and learn.
Posted on 9/23/14 at 5:15 pm to drizztiger
I still have a need at RB and own your boy knile
Posted on 9/23/14 at 5:19 pm to abellsujr
quote:I declined both now.
I sent you some trades in the Last Chance league.
I can't trade a WR now after our last trade. I'm down to 3 total on my entire team.
For this league, I agree. Should have kept Cooks out of it.
Posted on 9/23/14 at 5:26 pm to drizztiger
I still have hope that it'll get vetoed. 
Posted on 9/23/14 at 5:31 pm to BilJ
quote:At this point, being 0-3, I'm hoping Charles comes back and riding him, otherwise let Kniles do his thing.
I still have a need at RB and own your boy knile
I'm really much more disappointed in my WRs at this point. I really didn't see Fitz jumping off the cliff this badly. Almost same with Colston.
Posted on 9/23/14 at 5:33 pm to abellsujr
quote:I don't really veto trades normally.
I still have hope that it'll get vetoed.
If it's league consensus to veto, then I will sheep and follow.
I do think it's a bad trade.
Posted on 9/23/14 at 5:34 pm to drizztiger
Well... It's at 5 votes. Looks like it needs 1 more for veto
Posted on 9/23/14 at 5:35 pm to MrWiseGuy
quote:I'm fine being the 6th then.
Well... It's at 5 votes. Looks like it needs 1 more for veto
Would not touch it 1-5. Just me.
Posted on 9/23/14 at 5:37 pm to drizztiger
This post was edited on 9/23/14 at 5:38 pm
Posted on 9/23/14 at 5:38 pm to abellsujr
I was seriously about to post if it came to a decision vote, I would veto.
MWG posted and I vetoed.
ETA: If I take the blame, I'm fine with it. I think they can work out another trade.
MWG posted and I vetoed.
ETA: If I take the blame, I'm fine with it. I think they can work out another trade.
This post was edited on 9/23/14 at 5:40 pm
Posted on 9/23/14 at 5:51 pm to Nonetheless
I will consider offers for Manning involving RBs. But it's going to have to be a good one. If not, I'll take my chances.
Posted on 9/23/14 at 5:56 pm to MrWiseGuy
Vetoes are for fricking collusion not trades people simply don't like. fricking gay guys, really fricking gay.
Posted on 9/23/14 at 6:04 pm to Nonetheless
Wow, and I thought my trade was bad.
Popular
Back to top



1




