- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Should this trade be allowed?
Posted on 11/2/17 at 9:21 pm to Large Farva
Posted on 11/2/17 at 9:21 pm to Large Farva
I'm also in this league.
The trade was made without collusion. Just FYI.
It's an awful trade, I just have a hard time vetoing something due to ignorance.
The trade was made without collusion. Just FYI.
It's an awful trade, I just have a hard time vetoing something due to ignorance.
2
Posted on 11/2/17 at 9:25 pm to donRANDOMnumbers
I trade Jameis Winston and Chris Thompson for Antonio Brown, Mark Ingram, and Zach Ertz... I feel good
Posted on 11/2/17 at 9:31 pm to donRANDOMnumbers
quote:
I'm also in this league.
The trade was made without collusion. Just FYI.
It's an awful trade, I just have a hard time vetoing something due to ignorance.
I'm also in this league and just to air out our dirty laundry I'd like to point out that donRANDOMnumbers made the following trade a week ago:
He gave up Dez, Evan engram, and will fuller
Received Cam Newton, TY hilton, and Lagarette Blount
Posted on 11/2/17 at 9:33 pm to AubieALUMdvm
You son of a bitch. YOU GET OUT OF HERE. 
Posted on 11/2/17 at 9:53 pm to Large Farva
It’s a terrible trade but bad trades should not be vetoed.
Why punish someone for getting a deal done?
A terrible trade is not the same as a vetoable trade.
Why punish someone for getting a deal done?
A terrible trade is not the same as a vetoable trade.
This post was edited on 11/2/17 at 10:16 pm
Posted on 11/2/17 at 10:30 pm to CBandits82
quote:
A terrible trade is not the same as a vetoable trade.
I agree 99% of the time but the guy is getting nothing of value in return. I wouldn't have an issue with that being vetoed even if it's not clear collusion. I don't recall a trade in any of my leagues being that bad though.
Posted on 11/2/17 at 10:33 pm to AubieALUMdvm
quote:
I'm also in this league and just to air out our dirty laundry I'd like to point out that donRANDOMnumbers made the following trade a week ago:
He gave up Dez, Evan engram, and will fuller
Received Cam Newton, TY hilton, and Lagarette Blount
quote:lol wtf
You son of a bitch. YOU GET OUT OF HERE.?
Posted on 11/2/17 at 11:32 pm to Large Farva
Don't be that dude.
Just because someone made a dumb trade doesn't mean you can veto it. You should have been the one to contact them about Mike Evans first. Plus it's hard to fully gauge without each full roster
If you don't like the deal then don't invite the "I don't want to do or have time to research" person back to the league. They obviously don't care enough about FF or your league to make a good deal or keep up so they should not be invited back.
Again, don't be that dude
Just because someone made a dumb trade doesn't mean you can veto it. You should have been the one to contact them about Mike Evans first. Plus it's hard to fully gauge without each full roster
If you don't like the deal then don't invite the "I don't want to do or have time to research" person back to the league. They obviously don't care enough about FF or your league to make a good deal or keep up so they should not be invited back.
Again, don't be that dude
This post was edited on 11/2/17 at 11:44 pm
Posted on 11/2/17 at 11:57 pm to Peazey
quote:
Edit: It is bad enough that I would suspect some kind of collusion. I would ask them to justify the trade.
this. And an answer of "No time to research" means you're not coming back to the league next year.
You better justify yourself if it's that off, otherwise, you need to assume collusion.
At week 9, I'm definitely suspecting collusion. If you're doing it week 4, I'll maybe not be as suspicious.
Posted on 11/3/17 at 12:23 am to bbrownso
I’m also in this league
Posted on 11/3/17 at 12:27 am to AubieALUMdvm
quote:
I'm also in this league and just to air out our dirty laundry I'd like to point out that donRANDOMnumbers made the following trade a week ago: He gave up Dez, Evan engram, and will fuller Received Cam Newton, TY hilton, and Lagarette Blount
Should have vetoed this one too if you are going to start vetoing bad trades.
2.5 starters (Dez and Engram. Fuller a good fill in prior to DW injury) for maybe 1 starter in Cam. TY without luck is bad. Blount is TD dependent in a passing O
Could argue that this is Not much different than mike Evans 1 starter for maybe 1 starter in Gore.
The previous trade is almost as bad for what was given up
Posted on 11/3/17 at 7:21 am to MCrun2
You know nothing 0-5
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News