- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Should this trade be allowed?
Posted on 11/1/17 at 6:07 pm
Posted on 11/1/17 at 6:07 pm
Frank Gore
Devantae Adams
For
Mike Evans
Don't think anymore information needs to be given.
Devantae Adams
For
Mike Evans
Don't think anymore information needs to be given.
13
Posted on 11/1/17 at 6:10 pm to Large Farva
With Aaron Rogers as the GB QB, yes. With the junk they have now, nope
Posted on 11/1/17 at 6:12 pm to Large Farva
Fantasy Pros has it as 16 for 62
Pretty far off, IMO
Pretty far off, IMO
Posted on 11/1/17 at 6:12 pm to Large Farva
Is this team giving Mike Evans for sure out the playoffs?
Posted on 11/1/17 at 6:13 pm to GCTiger11
No. But with that trade that team would be out of playoffs. Team that would be receiving him is in first.
This post was edited on 11/1/17 at 6:15 pm
Posted on 11/1/17 at 6:16 pm to Large Farva
how big is the league?
Posted on 11/1/17 at 6:20 pm to Lester Earl
12
Posted on 11/1/17 at 6:21 pm to Large Farva
quote:
No. But with that trade that team would be out of playoffs. Team that would be receiving him is in first.
So when you originally said “no other info needed” all the sudden the new info changes things. At least for me bc I’m not a crybaby like yourself.
Trade is crap
Posted on 11/1/17 at 6:22 pm to Large Farva
Ask the team giving away Mike Evans why. I don't get that one.
Posted on 11/1/17 at 6:22 pm to Vicks Kennel Club
"No time to do research"
Posted on 11/1/17 at 6:23 pm to Large Farva
post the team getting the 2 players
Posted on 11/1/17 at 6:32 pm to Large Farva
It should be allowed, but it's pretty shitty. Is there any reason to think that this could be collusion?
Edit: It is bad enough that I would suspect some kind of collusion. I would ask them to justify the trade.
Edit: It is bad enough that I would suspect some kind of collusion. I would ask them to justify the trade.
This post was edited on 11/1/17 at 6:35 pm
Posted on 11/1/17 at 6:52 pm to Large Farva
Absolutely.
Posted on 11/1/17 at 7:00 pm to Large Farva
Terrible trade. Veto
Posted on 11/1/17 at 7:18 pm to Wal-Mart Warrior
Just because it's a terrible trade doesn't mean it need to be vetoed...unless you're just a bitch.
Posted on 11/1/17 at 7:41 pm to Large Farva
Gore and Adams are barely even rosterable 
Posted on 11/1/17 at 7:42 pm to lsuhunt555
So a terrible trade doesn’t need to be vetoed? Yeah okay. Team A (1st place) getting Evans and sending Adams and Gore to Team B (7th place) who make playoffs by trading away Evans. Adams won’t start and Gore is a RB2 at best for Team B. Team B trading away Evans gets nothing out of the trade. Could and should be getting better value for Evans than that.
12man 0.5PPR League
12man 0.5PPR League
Posted on 11/1/17 at 7:43 pm to Large Farva
I'd veto the shite outta that trade.
Posted on 11/1/17 at 7:45 pm to Large Farva
Aka he is throwing his team away. That's a veto
Posted on 11/1/17 at 7:49 pm to Vicks Kennel Club
Veto
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News