- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 2/16/14 at 2:50 am to CQQ
Anyone want Irving, J. Crawford (LAC), or S. Blake?
Need a C in return
Need a C in return
Posted on 2/17/14 at 12:58 pm to drake20
Kinda bullshite trade since Danman no longer gives a frick
Posted on 2/17/14 at 1:00 pm to CQQ
absolutely bullshite trade
quote:
Make a trade with me in the PTFBBL
quote:
Oh yea I almost forgot I was in that league
Sure why not. I've been emotionally checked out on that team for weeks.
quote:
You propose something and I'll probably accept it
Like seriously anything. I don't give a shite.
This post was edited on 2/17/14 at 1:03 pm
Posted on 2/17/14 at 1:16 pm to drake20
No collusion on my part I simply asked him to make a trade with me.
In fact he declined my first offer. I accepted his counter. This isn't even as bad as the "rape" I had earlier in the year
In fact he declined my first offer. I accepted his counter. This isn't even as bad as the "rape" I had earlier in the year
Posted on 2/17/14 at 1:20 pm to droman225
I don't necessarily think it's collusion, that's why I did not veto. It's simply having a poor owner who I had a feeling would not work out from the start.
Drake, you were the one that said let Danman in
Drake, you were the one that said let Danman in
Posted on 2/17/14 at 1:39 pm to CQQ
Droman is fine. I don't blame you for trying to take advantage...I just don't see how the trade makes any sense from danman's point of view, other than to help dro out
Posted on 2/17/14 at 1:39 pm to CQQ
quote:
Drake, you were the one that said let Danman in
solid posting doesn't necessarily translate to solid fantasy play, apparently...my bad
Posted on 2/17/14 at 1:44 pm to drake20
Jefferson is better than Pekovic no matter how you spin it...and Pekovic has been injured and out for a minute.
...and then Crawford for Beal AND Thompson -- very lopsided with one owner claiming he will "accept anything".
...and then Crawford for Beal AND Thompson -- very lopsided with one owner claiming he will "accept anything".
Posted on 2/17/14 at 1:54 pm to drake20
Probably should have put this one up for vote since Dan was involved.
Posted on 2/17/14 at 3:14 pm to droman225
This is pretty bad dro, i'm up for lopsided trades in some instances, if the team has a need. Not sure how this benefits Dan. No biggie to me though since I'm out of contention.
Posted on 2/17/14 at 3:33 pm to CQQ
quote:who has a better record than me
It's simply having a poor owner
Posted on 2/17/14 at 4:01 pm to Fearthehat0307
Hes poor, you're shitty.
Posted on 2/17/14 at 4:32 pm to dj30
quote:lol what happened in the title game last year and the fantasy football playoffs this year?
Hes poor, you're shitty.
Posted on 2/17/14 at 5:11 pm to Fearthehat0307
I have selective memory.
Posted on 2/17/14 at 6:07 pm to CQQ
quote:Dude frick you. Why do you find the need to always talk shite to me about everything?
It's simply having a poor owner who I had a feeling would not work out from the start.
I've been the most active trader in the league. I set my lineups. I post in this thread. What do you want from me here? Sorry my team fricking blows and I have NO shot at the playoffs so my interest has waned.
And that trade wasn't collusion. I even changed the initial trade so I would get more than what he offered at first.
Posted on 2/17/14 at 6:10 pm to danman6336
I didnt claim it was collusion. I know you couldnt care less if Dro wins. Its just a dumb trade by someone who openly said he was willing to get trade raped.
Popular
Back to top


1





