- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Pelicans Talk Fantasy Basketball League, Year 3
Posted on 1/26/14 at 8:20 pm to LosLobos111
Posted on 1/26/14 at 8:20 pm to LosLobos111
quote:
IMO if someone should put an extra player in it shouldn't count(like tyreke) To forfeit is a little extreme
+1
0
Posted on 1/26/14 at 8:30 pm to CQQ
Manual count for this week:
Lobos, you're the only one that went over.
CQQ - 27
Lobos - 29
Fleur - 28
Tots - 28
DCB - 27
Danman - 22
Fear - 28
Daryl - 28
Coach D - 28
Drake - 28
Dro - 28
None - 27
Lobos, you're the only one that went over.
CQQ - 27
Lobos - 29
Fleur - 28
Tots - 28
DCB - 27
Danman - 22
Fear - 28
Daryl - 28
Coach D - 28
Drake - 28
Dro - 28
None - 27
Posted on 1/26/14 at 8:31 pm to LosLobos111
quote:
IMO if someone should put an extra player in it shouldn't count(like tyreke) To forfeit is a little extreme but it's not my call.
That would definitely be ideal but then you get into a pissing match over which players points to deduct.
I say we try Yahoo next year.
Posted on 1/26/14 at 8:34 pm to CQQ
quote:
That would definitely be ideal but then you get into a pissing match over which players points to deduct.
I say we try Yahoo next year.
Hopefully yahoo prevents it(i think they do if basebals an indication)
We'll figure it out
Posted on 1/26/14 at 8:55 pm to LosLobos111
Take away Rekes points, and Im ahead so it works either way. We square?
Posted on 1/26/14 at 9:03 pm to CQQ
quote:
Take away Rekes points, and Im ahead so it works either way. We square?
that's good with me
This post was edited on 1/26/14 at 9:06 pm
Posted on 1/26/14 at 9:32 pm to CQQ
quote:
CQQ
So espn has the wrong numbers up for us all in terms of starts? I'm going to lose either way this week, but I just wanted to make sure.
Posted on 1/26/14 at 9:32 pm to Fearthehat0307
I'm not sure why it is adding extra games to everyone's games played number. I started today with 25 games played and Fleur started with 24 games played...not it has both of us exceeding the 28 number when we didn't play more than what would give us 28
Posted on 1/26/14 at 9:36 pm to LosLobos111
quote:Didn't we all decide last week that moving forward you would get an auto L if you exceeded the 28 starts due to the fact that ESPN cannot monitor it?
I'm warning you against this due to the pandoras box you'll open. If tyrekes 31 bothers you,dock it.
With that being the case, and you having 29, then the commish should follow through. No excuses about whether or not someone will play. If he has a game on the schedule, why not bench him if there is even a small chance that he could play?
Posted on 1/26/14 at 9:38 pm to Fleur de Diable
Yea, something got jacked up
Posted on 1/26/14 at 9:39 pm to CQQ
My above post has the right #s, everyone was good on starts but Lobos.
Just to confirm, if you go over 28, you will forfeit.
Just to confirm, if you go over 28, you will forfeit.
Posted on 1/26/14 at 9:45 pm to LosLobos111
This is ridiculous dude, you had all week to count the number of starts your team was making this week. You should definitely forfeit because that what was agreed upon. It shouldn't be up to the commissioner to decide which players points to take away. What if one of your players put up negative points, should he add points to your score? You just need to do a better job in managing your roster.
Posted on 1/26/14 at 9:54 pm to dj30
I'm the one that suggested rekes points be docked so i in retrospect "forfeited", We worked everything out.
You have no reason to be attacking me right now over a now dead issue.
I'm moving on
You have no reason to be attacking me right now over a now dead issue.
I'm moving on
Posted on 1/26/14 at 10:00 pm to LosLobos111
No, because this seems like it will be a weekly issue with you. It's not that hard to count.
Posted on 1/26/14 at 10:01 pm to dj30
quote:jesus christ you don't have to be such a dick about it
No, because this seems like it will be a weekly issue with you. It's not that hard to count.
Posted on 1/26/14 at 10:07 pm to dj30
quote:
No, because this seems like it will be a weekly issue with you. It's not that hard to count.
*sigh*
I already said i screwed up and i'm not going to take my time to explain to a guy that has a history of getting upset over the littlest things.
Being a dick gets you nowhere my friend
This post was edited on 1/26/14 at 10:08 pm
Posted on 1/26/14 at 10:13 pm to LosLobos111
I'm the dick, but you're the one who is complaining about a rule that was agreed upon just this week. I didn't ask for an explanation from you, I just called you out because you were being a bitch.
Posted on 1/26/14 at 10:21 pm to dj30
quote:
I'm the dick, but you're the one who is complaining about a rule that was agreed upon just this week. I didn't ask for an explanation from you, I just called you out because you were being a bitch.
I didn't complain about the league itself,i was upset at the way ESPN handles their software. I do feel that the forfeit thing is a bit much but its not my call.
I was being completely civil with cqq and we talked over it like friends should.
Then again i guess you wouldn't know what "friends" and "bonds" are right? With the way you act i'm not suprised.
Posted on 1/26/14 at 10:33 pm to dj30
good stuff, guys
Posted on 1/27/14 at 12:09 am to LosLobos111
quote:
Then again i guess you wouldn't know what "friends" and "bonds" are right? With the way you act i'm not suprised.
Page 102 of 125
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News