- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Is this trade veto worthy or fair?
Posted on 10/26/18 at 8:50 am to dafif5
Posted on 10/26/18 at 8:50 am to dafif5
Not veto worthy, but team A is crazy giving up Green for that. Collins and Landry are solid Flex options at this point in 10-12 team leagues. Green has been a legitimate WR1. I picked up Richard off waivers and have more faith in him than Collins moving forward in a PPR.
Dumb trade is dumb, but the commish has no business vetoing it!
Dumb trade is dumb, but the commish has no business vetoing it!
2
Posted on 10/26/18 at 9:03 am to Shameless
Landry has had kind of a rough start to the season, but I think it's still fair to view him as a high end wr2 with low end wr1 upside in a half ppr league. Even better in full ppr. He is supposed to be at the start of some good match ups coming up.
Posted on 10/26/18 at 9:07 am to dafif5
What an absolute shite move by your commish. I’d be pissed even if the league vetoed because this is a fair enough trade and certainly doesn’t appear as collusion or someone tricking the other party.
For the commish to just veto without discussing it or even bringing it up to the parties involved is horse shite. I’d call him out in front of the whole league and get an explanation. I’d also seriously consider leaving a shite league like that.
For the commish to just veto without discussing it or even bringing it up to the parties involved is horse shite. I’d call him out in front of the whole league and get an explanation. I’d also seriously consider leaving a shite league like that.
Posted on 10/26/18 at 9:10 am to Shameless
quote:
Green has been a legitimate WR1.
He's been a WR1 in 2 out of 7 weeks
Posted on 10/26/18 at 9:55 am to GOON
It's also a league made up of friends/friends of friends and everyone putting up $50. When it comes to trades it's a shady practice to enfore rules arbitrarily based on how teams are doing. To me it's like breaking bro code.
This post was edited on 10/26/18 at 9:56 am
Posted on 10/26/18 at 10:41 am to GynoSandberg
quote:
He's been a WR1 in 2 out of 7 weeks
He’s 9th best WR in my 12 team PPR, I’d say WR1. Everyone has good and bad games, quit clowning.
Edit: Landry #20 WR, Collins #26 RB.
So a WR1 for a WR2 and a Flex. Based off of the rosters, Team A really isn’t gaining anything.. I would decline that trade 10/10 times, but probably wouldn’t veto it as commish.
This post was edited on 10/26/18 at 10:46 am
Posted on 10/26/18 at 10:47 am to Shameless
quote:
He’s 9th best WR in my 12 team PPR, I’d say WR1
ya he scored 30 points one game and hasnt been over 20 in any other. The big week doesnt help the rest of the weeks. He's been a WR2 thus far, dont let the name fool ya
Posted on 10/26/18 at 10:50 am to Shameless
quote:
He’s 9th best WR in my 12 team PPR, I’d say WR1. Everyone has good and bad games, quit clowning.
Albert Wilson was WR19 after week 6. He was not a WR2
wk 1 = 6.8
wk 2 = 13.50
wk 3 = 24.00
wk 4 = 6.10
wk 5 = 9.30
wk 6 = 33.00
Not a WR2 with those numbers and volatility
eta- AJ Green is WR13 on the season in points per game
This post was edited on 10/26/18 at 10:52 am
Posted on 10/26/18 at 11:01 am to VermilionTiger
WR1 - 2 games
WR2 - 4 games
WR4 - 1 game
AJ Green has been consistent and not killing you, but he's isnt the WR1 in the sense that Theilen, Adams, Hopkins etc have been.
WR2 - 4 games
WR4 - 1 game
AJ Green has been consistent and not killing you, but he's isnt the WR1 in the sense that Theilen, Adams, Hopkins etc have been.
Posted on 10/26/18 at 11:16 am to GynoSandberg
Trade was resubmitted and subsequently vetoed again by the league after I called out the commish for being a pussy arse bish. Team A just countered with Drake/Landry for Green, but I envision that will get vetoed as well because this league is scared. Never playing with these people again
Posted on 10/26/18 at 11:33 am to dafif5
It's baffling how many adults behave like children when it comes to fantasy football and their team is sucking arse. They whine about changing this rule or that rule next season because THAT is the reason they are doing so bad. They wanna veto trades because THEY are not benefiting but if the same people can get away with trade rape they'd do it in a heartbeat.
Posted on 10/26/18 at 11:34 am to dafif5
quote:
Trade was resubmitted and subsequently vetoed again by the league after I called out the commish for being a pussy arse bish. Team A just countered with Drake/Landry for Green, but I envision that will get vetoed as well because this league is scared. Never playing with these people again
Veto for what reason?
Any trade is gonna make the teams better, thats part of trading.
If owners are vetoing trades because its making teams better then the league needs to not have trades happen and get rid of the option.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News