- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 5/27/18 at 10:20 pm to rondo
Rondy you seem perturbed by this convo earlier, yet you keep addressing me trying to keep it going. Gchat me if you want to talk
Posted on 5/27/18 at 10:27 pm to cwill
quote:
That’s 4 separate teams? Name them.
2
And what do you care? One of the inactive teams listed played against you and you didn't seem to care that they were inactive then.
It's actually the 2nd time you've benefitted from playing an inactive team, CQQ in week 1 being the 1st.
Posted on 5/27/18 at 10:28 pm to cwill
quote:
He quit.
He's quit before.
Posted on 5/27/18 at 10:32 pm to swamie
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/28/18 at 1:44 am
Posted on 5/27/18 at 10:32 pm to swamie
quote:
One of the inactive teams listed played against you and you didn't seem to care that they were inactive then.
dude wouldnt know if another team isn’t setting. Posted on 5/27/18 at 10:33 pm to dj30
Well, I need to call myself out too now because his inactivity benefitted me as well and unless I said something about him last time we discussed this, then I should have said something sooner.
And he's another one who doesn't own his draft pick this year so what's the point?
And he's another one who doesn't own his draft pick this year so what's the point?
This post was edited on 5/27/18 at 10:44 pm
Posted on 5/27/18 at 10:44 pm to swamie
I mentioned CQQ then and I was waiting for the end of the week to mention Peyton was inactive and missed the min IP. Why haven’t you mentioned it previously?
Posted on 5/27/18 at 11:01 pm to cwill
quote:
I mentioned CQQ then
quote:
I was lucky to face CQQ week 1. My bats have been pretty dead so far and a rocky start for my RPs.
Posted on 5/27/18 at 11:03 pm to swamie
So much drama. Good lord.
Posted on 5/27/18 at 11:04 pm to swamie
quote:
He's quit before.
Yes, it’s his MO....every league.
Posted on 5/27/18 at 11:10 pm to RollDatRoll
rolldat made dat arse quit
Posted on 5/27/18 at 11:20 pm to rondo
Changed my mind. Gyno should leave.
Posted on 5/27/18 at 11:23 pm to swamie
I’m IRT 
Posted on 5/27/18 at 11:28 pm to swamie
You’ve faced OMT and Pey without complaint or note. So...
Posted on 5/28/18 at 12:02 am to cwill
quote:
OMT
quote:
I can’t defend his lack of waiver activity or logging in as much as we do.
I’m just saying there are other owners who are just as bad but actually effect scoring outcomes and do so intentionally.
Like starting Hernan Perez and Jose Reyes for example.
quote:
I wish OMT really didn’t give a shite bc I would have had a win in week 1 if he didn’t switch out Schebler for Panik.
OMT was making moves that week. Hell, it was probably his most active week this season.
quote:
Pey
He made lineup changes every day but one that week. I remember noticing that he added Garcia and put Tomlin in his lineup that led to 11 scoreless innings and stealing ERA from me.
When I mentioned OMT leaving O'Neil on the bench, it was because he didn't log in for 4 days and left players who weren't playing on the active roster.
This post was edited on 5/28/18 at 12:04 am
Posted on 5/28/18 at 12:25 am to GynoSandberg
quote:
this TD board really loves fantasy leagues that feature streaming
Pitchers. Let's get that straight. You don't like streaming starting pitchers. Let's see how quickly a guy like Matt Joyce is added and dropped each day that he faces a soft tossing RHP. Why is that streaming OK but a SP being streamed causes a monthly outburst? Redd posted a couple of pages back about the catcher he streamed hitting a HR without anyone mentioning anything afterwards. And that happens a good bit in a league like ours. I picked up OF Gordon this week for a spot start that he ended up getting scratched for. I also added some SPs this week to maintain my IP lead when I had multiple SPs get yanked before getting past 3 or 4 innings (and still lost that category). But if we're bitching about streaming, then it has to be done accross the board. Don't just pick & choose the categories that it's ok to stream for and then write a post calling out streaming for the only two SP categories we have.
I'm all for rule changes or roster size changes that can help get rid of streaming altogether. And I'm not opposed to replacing IP as a category (I voted against replacing it this off-season because I felt the replacement categories we had to choose from would have benefitted RPs more than SPs; thus, giving a boost to strong RP teams). But c'mon, threatening to quit the league because of SP streaming when offensive streaming happens all the time too?
Posted on 5/28/18 at 12:45 am to TTownTiger
quote:
Why is that streaming OK but a SP being streamed causes a monthly outburst?
Imagine if ABs were a stat you could win.
That is the hitting equivalent of IP.
We have 12 stats & 11 of them measure quality, except this one. And people stream to win this shite category. Even a stat that people see as a duplication would be better than IP.
Posted on 5/28/18 at 1:27 am to Lester Earl
quote:
That is the hitting equivalent of IP.
Gyno and a few owners recently posted about the importance of SPs in this league. That is specifically because of the IP category right now. Take IP away and replace it with another ratio category or any other category that a RP can contribute to - see what happens to the importance of SPs in this league if 5 of the 6 pitching categories can be swayed by stacking RPs.
You want an alternative that I can’t remember if it was mentioned yet or not: change the pitching positions to 5 SPs and 4 RPs or something similar. Then you’ll have more wiggle room with changing that IP category to something else because you’re limiting the affects of RP stacking another way. Or increase IP limit even more if needed. But if IP is changed to anything a RP stack can win each week, then you need to counter that another way in order to keep SP value from taking a hit.
Until then, i can’t bitch about someone streaming a SP hoping for 5+ IP while another owner is steaming Jarrod Dyson for a day or two hoping for nSB. I understand the quality vs quantity argument for the scoring categories, but as long as it is a category then you play to win it if you can.
In one post, owners are being bitched at for not paying attention to their teams anymore. The very next post is bitching about owners doing everything they can to win categories (streaming).
Posted on 5/28/18 at 5:45 am to GynoSandberg
Are you seriously going to leave a team with no prospects on the roster and no first round picks for the next three years?
I’m having a hard time believing you would actually do something like that.
I’m having a hard time believing you would actually do something like that.
Page 293 of 479
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News