- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: FSBDL 2018 - MWG is your Champion
Posted on 2/22/18 at 4:27 pm to reddman
Posted on 2/22/18 at 4:27 pm to reddman
quote:
2. When a trade results in extra players, give the owner a designated amount of time (24 hours?) to make his roster legal. Owner is allowed to make it legal via drops or trades. Failure to do so will result in trade being reversed, and players returned to their original rosters.
This actually leaves the door open for someone with buyer's remorse to purposely try to get a deal reversed. Not saying someone would do that... but you know, shite happens.
Posted on 2/22/18 at 4:28 pm to papz
quote:
This actually leaves the door open for someone with buyer's remorse to purposely try to get a deal reversed. Not saying someone would do that... but you know, shite happens.
exactly
and with the way other people's opinions are expressed after every trade ... nope, don't like option 2 or 3
This post was edited on 2/22/18 at 4:28 pm
Posted on 2/22/18 at 4:28 pm to MrWiseGuy
Right, they can just trade again
Option 3 is the way to go
It eliminstes The trading aspect with an illegal lineup and it won’t go 24 hours without being pressured to get it rught
Option 3 is the way to go
It eliminstes The trading aspect with an illegal lineup and it won’t go 24 hours without being pressured to get it rught
Posted on 2/22/18 at 4:29 pm to GynoSandberg
quote:
Option 3 is the way to go
option 3 still reverses the trade. I want to avoid that.
Posted on 2/22/18 at 4:30 pm to MrWiseGuy
unless We have some kind of penalty, it leaves the rule open to too much interpretation.
I thought about draft pick penalty, but that affects everyone differently.
I thought about draft pick penalty, but that affects everyone differently.
Posted on 2/22/18 at 4:32 pm to reddman
draft pick penalty was the first thing I thought of. but then you have an owner like me who never owns a pick
ETA: Maybe take away an MiLB slot. I suggested that last year as a punishment and got, well, ridiculed for it.
But I think that is impactful for just about every owner -- rebuilder and contender.
ETA: Maybe take away an MiLB slot. I suggested that last year as a punishment and got, well, ridiculed for it.
But I think that is impactful for just about every owner -- rebuilder and contender.
This post was edited on 2/22/18 at 4:33 pm
Posted on 2/22/18 at 4:34 pm to MrWiseGuy
Taking away one slot from just one team is just another thing to have to monitor. Would prefer to avoid that.
Posted on 2/22/18 at 4:35 pm to MrWiseGuy
Will someone blatantly disregard the 24 hour rule? I don’t see it getting there. With the pressure of 5 commissioners etc. You can lock their add/drops for the remainder of the offseason or something if they break it
Posted on 2/22/18 at 4:38 pm to GynoSandberg
I need to reword it. I didn’t actually have extra players in my trade that you and LE were opposed to. I had a minor leaguer in a MLB slot and he wasn’t eligible to be there.
Posted on 2/22/18 at 4:43 pm to reddman
To me It’s making a transaction with an illegal lineup
I don’t see how we can allow anyone to trade, make an add drop, or sit on an illegal lineup for an extended period of time
I don’t see how we can allow anyone to trade, make an add drop, or sit on an illegal lineup for an extended period of time
Posted on 2/22/18 at 4:44 pm to GynoSandberg
quote:
Will someone blatantly disregard the 24 hour rule? I don’t see it getting there.
I just dont want a rule that doesn't allow for other league members to opine of a completed trade, then leaving an owner the option of backing out of a deal once they receive more opinions.
This post was edited on 2/22/18 at 4:49 pm
Posted on 2/22/18 at 4:46 pm to GynoSandberg
No I understand. I just need to make it say illegal lineup instead of “extra players”
Posted on 2/22/18 at 4:48 pm to MrWiseGuy
I think there’s a greater chance of an owner not reversing one of your trades that you mistakenly accept than there is of that scenario actually happening.
Posted on 2/22/18 at 4:53 pm to reddman
quote:
greater chance
I don't want there to be a chance at all.
Clicking accept rather than decline vs. having second thoughts hours later on a trade are completely different.
This post was edited on 2/22/18 at 4:54 pm
Posted on 2/22/18 at 5:01 pm to MrWiseGuy
That was a half jab at your goofs
Posted on 2/22/18 at 5:05 pm to reddman
quote:
Drury said he made changes to his swing this offseason in an attempt to hit more home-runs, Brendan Kuty of NJ.com reports.
Analysis:Drury hit 37 doubles last season while swatting 13 homers in 135 games for the Diamondbacks. With his retooled approach, the 25-year-old is hoping to turn some of those two-baggers into homers. It should help playing half of his games in hitter-friendly Yankee Stadium. Drury's performance in Grapefruit League play should offer more insight into whether his adjustments are paying off.
bump for the night crew
Looking to deal
Posted on 2/22/18 at 6:23 pm to reddman
I am going to propose that we add this to the constitution:
During the offseason, when a trade results in a team having an illegal roster, the owner of said team must make the roster legal within 24 hours of deal being accepted. No trading will be allowed by that team until then. Failure to make the roster legal will result in a 1 week in-season suspension of add/drop privileges for each 24 hour period that passes with an illegal roster.
(we can actually use fantrax to lock someone out of transactions for a given period).
If you would vote for this rule, please upvote. If not, please downvote and give reasons why. If this gets enough support on here tonight, I will put it up for an official vote later tonight or tomorrow morning. Since it is a new rule, it would need a majority of those that actually vote in order to pass.
During the offseason, when a trade results in a team having an illegal roster, the owner of said team must make the roster legal within 24 hours of deal being accepted. No trading will be allowed by that team until then. Failure to make the roster legal will result in a 1 week in-season suspension of add/drop privileges for each 24 hour period that passes with an illegal roster.
(we can actually use fantrax to lock someone out of transactions for a given period).
If you would vote for this rule, please upvote. If not, please downvote and give reasons why. If this gets enough support on here tonight, I will put it up for an official vote later tonight or tomorrow morning. Since it is a new rule, it would need a majority of those that actually vote in order to pass.
This post was edited on 2/22/18 at 6:25 pm
Posted on 2/22/18 at 6:26 pm to reddman
What if a player had two moves to make simultaneously?
Say I brokered a 2 for 1 with one team and a 1 for 2 with another....
Say I brokered a 2 for 1 with one team and a 1 for 2 with another....
Posted on 2/22/18 at 6:27 pm to rondo
then it needs to be a three team trade processed all at the same time.
Posted on 2/22/18 at 7:18 pm to rondo
quote:
Say I brokered a 2 for 1 with one team and a 1 for 2 with another
just ask each owner to send you the trade requests instead of you sending it to them. That way you can accept both at the same time.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News