Started By
Message

re: FSBDL 2018 - MWG is your Champion

Posted on 2/22/18 at 4:27 pm to
Posted by papz
Austin, TX
Member since Jul 2008
9330 posts
Posted on 2/22/18 at 4:27 pm to
quote:

2. When a trade results in extra players, give the owner a designated amount of time (24 hours?) to make his roster legal. Owner is allowed to make it legal via drops or trades. Failure to do so will result in trade being reversed, and players returned to their original rosters.


This actually leaves the door open for someone with buyer's remorse to purposely try to get a deal reversed. Not saying someone would do that... but you know, shite happens.
Posted by MrWiseGuy
Member since Dec 2009
27427 posts
Posted on 2/22/18 at 4:28 pm to
quote:

This actually leaves the door open for someone with buyer's remorse to purposely try to get a deal reversed. Not saying someone would do that... but you know, shite happens.

exactly

and with the way other people's opinions are expressed after every trade ... nope, don't like option 2 or 3
This post was edited on 2/22/18 at 4:28 pm
Posted by GynoSandberg
Member since Jan 2006
72053 posts
Posted on 2/22/18 at 4:28 pm to
Right, they can just trade again

Option 3 is the way to go

It eliminstes The trading aspect with an illegal lineup and it won’t go 24 hours without being pressured to get it rught
Posted by MrWiseGuy
Member since Dec 2009
27427 posts
Posted on 2/22/18 at 4:29 pm to
quote:

Option 3 is the way to go

option 3 still reverses the trade. I want to avoid that.
Posted by reddman
Member since Jul 2005
78187 posts
Posted on 2/22/18 at 4:30 pm to
unless We have some kind of penalty, it leaves the rule open to too much interpretation.

I thought about draft pick penalty, but that affects everyone differently.
Posted by MrWiseGuy
Member since Dec 2009
27427 posts
Posted on 2/22/18 at 4:32 pm to
draft pick penalty was the first thing I thought of. but then you have an owner like me who never owns a pick

ETA: Maybe take away an MiLB slot. I suggested that last year as a punishment and got, well, ridiculed for it.

But I think that is impactful for just about every owner -- rebuilder and contender.
This post was edited on 2/22/18 at 4:33 pm
Posted by reddman
Member since Jul 2005
78187 posts
Posted on 2/22/18 at 4:34 pm to
Taking away one slot from just one team is just another thing to have to monitor. Would prefer to avoid that.
Posted by GynoSandberg
Member since Jan 2006
72053 posts
Posted on 2/22/18 at 4:35 pm to
Will someone blatantly disregard the 24 hour rule? I don’t see it getting there. With the pressure of 5 commissioners etc. You can lock their add/drops for the remainder of the offseason or something if they break it
Posted by reddman
Member since Jul 2005
78187 posts
Posted on 2/22/18 at 4:38 pm to
I need to reword it. I didn’t actually have extra players in my trade that you and LE were opposed to. I had a minor leaguer in a MLB slot and he wasn’t eligible to be there.
Posted by GynoSandberg
Member since Jan 2006
72053 posts
Posted on 2/22/18 at 4:43 pm to
To me It’s making a transaction with an illegal lineup

I don’t see how we can allow anyone to trade, make an add drop, or sit on an illegal lineup for an extended period of time
Posted by MrWiseGuy
Member since Dec 2009
27427 posts
Posted on 2/22/18 at 4:44 pm to
quote:

Will someone blatantly disregard the 24 hour rule? I don’t see it getting there.

I just dont want a rule that doesn't allow for other league members to opine of a completed trade, then leaving an owner the option of backing out of a deal once they receive more opinions.
This post was edited on 2/22/18 at 4:49 pm
Posted by reddman
Member since Jul 2005
78187 posts
Posted on 2/22/18 at 4:46 pm to
No I understand. I just need to make it say illegal lineup instead of “extra players”
Posted by reddman
Member since Jul 2005
78187 posts
Posted on 2/22/18 at 4:48 pm to
I think there’s a greater chance of an owner not reversing one of your trades that you mistakenly accept than there is of that scenario actually happening.
Posted by MrWiseGuy
Member since Dec 2009
27427 posts
Posted on 2/22/18 at 4:53 pm to
quote:

greater chance

I don't want there to be a chance at all.

Clicking accept rather than decline vs. having second thoughts hours later on a trade are completely different.
This post was edited on 2/22/18 at 4:54 pm
Posted by reddman
Member since Jul 2005
78187 posts
Posted on 2/22/18 at 5:01 pm to
That was a half jab at your goofs
Posted by GynoSandberg
Member since Jan 2006
72053 posts
Posted on 2/22/18 at 5:05 pm to
quote:

Drury said he made changes to his swing this offseason in an attempt to hit more home-runs, Brendan Kuty of NJ.com reports.
Analysis:Drury hit 37 doubles last season while swatting 13 homers in 135 games for the Diamondbacks. With his retooled approach, the 25-year-old is hoping to turn some of those two-baggers into homers. It should help playing half of his games in hitter-friendly Yankee Stadium. Drury's performance in Grapefruit League play should offer more insight into whether his adjustments are paying off.



bump for the night crew

Looking to deal
Posted by reddman
Member since Jul 2005
78187 posts
Posted on 2/22/18 at 6:23 pm to
I am going to propose that we add this to the constitution:


During the offseason, when a trade results in a team having an illegal roster, the owner of said team must make the roster legal within 24 hours of deal being accepted. No trading will be allowed by that team until then. Failure to make the roster legal will result in a 1 week in-season suspension of add/drop privileges for each 24 hour period that passes with an illegal roster.

(we can actually use fantrax to lock someone out of transactions for a given period).


If you would vote for this rule, please upvote. If not, please downvote and give reasons why. If this gets enough support on here tonight, I will put it up for an official vote later tonight or tomorrow morning. Since it is a new rule, it would need a majority of those that actually vote in order to pass.
This post was edited on 2/22/18 at 6:25 pm
Posted by rondo
Worst. Poster. Evar.
Member since Jan 2004
77413 posts
Posted on 2/22/18 at 6:26 pm to
What if a player had two moves to make simultaneously?


Say I brokered a 2 for 1 with one team and a 1 for 2 with another....
Posted by reddman
Member since Jul 2005
78187 posts
Posted on 2/22/18 at 6:27 pm to
then it needs to be a three team trade processed all at the same time.

Posted by TTownTiger
Austin
Member since Oct 2007
5303 posts
Posted on 2/22/18 at 7:18 pm to
quote:

Say I brokered a 2 for 1 with one team and a 1 for 2 with another


just ask each owner to send you the trade requests instead of you sending it to them. That way you can accept both at the same time.
first pageprev pagePage 129 of 479Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram