- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 2012 TDBL Offseason Thread: Draft Scheduled for March 21st
Posted on 3/19/12 at 3:05 pm to gonads&strife
Posted on 3/19/12 at 3:05 pm to gonads&strife
quote:
Interesting that once your team has aged its way out of contention you want to revert to 10 player keeper.
Bingo. I remember LE saying that 12 was a good number for this league last season.
3
Posted on 3/19/12 at 3:06 pm to GynoSandberg
I do agree. Just pointing out the wool pulling Lester tends to try.
Posted on 3/19/12 at 3:09 pm to EarlyBird
Who exactly on LE's team has aged out of contention, besides Carpenter?
ETA Maybe Aram, but he's entering his prime
ETA Maybe Aram, but he's entering his prime
This post was edited on 3/19/12 at 3:10 pm
Posted on 3/19/12 at 3:09 pm to gonads&strife
Just looking for a change. Before I made trades I had 16 keepable players this year.
Rick has like 3. Not sure why he is hating.
Rick has like 3. Not sure why he is hating.
Posted on 3/19/12 at 3:09 pm to EarlyBird
I think it would be ridiculous to change the number of keepers after teams have been planning around it for several years. Especially when the move is contrary to previous discussions on the subject. What has changed?
Posted on 3/19/12 at 3:10 pm to rmc
quote:
No shite. Could have sworn les was leading the charge to go from 10 to 12.
I'm actually pretty sure he wanted it at more than 12 at one point. I like it the way it is
Posted on 3/19/12 at 3:12 pm to EarlyBird
I lobbied for 12 like in 2007.
Did we not vote on it? If all y'all were against it then it would not have passed. So frick off
Did we not vote on it? If all y'all were against it then it would not have passed. So frick off
Posted on 3/19/12 at 3:12 pm to GynoSandberg
quote:
ETA Maybe Aram, but he's entering his prime
lulz
Posted on 3/19/12 at 3:16 pm to TigerPhan27
ok
Posted on 3/19/12 at 3:17 pm to GynoSandberg
ok
Posted on 3/19/12 at 3:17 pm to Lester Earl
We did vote on it and it passed. So why change it again? Are we going to change it every time you get bored with the setup? I certainly don't want that to happen.
Posted on 3/19/12 at 3:17 pm to GynoSandberg
Cwill thought Ryan Howard was old but just so happened to lead the NL in RBI last year. Somehow my whole team is old yet it looks nothing like it did at the end of last year.
Posted on 3/19/12 at 3:20 pm to EarlyBird
We don't have to change it. It was just an idea to give teams like you and Rick a chance to compete. People brought it up a few weeks ago. I'm sorry for mentioning it.
Posted on 3/19/12 at 3:21 pm to Lester Earl
I vote we increase the keepers to 20.
Posted on 3/19/12 at 3:23 pm to Lester Earl
Lol. Love the chance to compete boom.
Posted on 3/19/12 at 3:23 pm to reddman
quote:
I vote we increase the keepers to 20.
+1
Posted on 3/19/12 at 3:24 pm to rmc
Most of the same teams are either bad or mediocre year after year.
Knat was able to break through. Take notice Rick
Knat was able to break through. Take notice Rick
Posted on 3/19/12 at 3:27 pm to Lester Earl
Posted on 3/19/12 at 3:30 pm to Lester Earl
Well I haven't made it to Lester Earl status, but I think my team is improving.
Posted on 3/19/12 at 3:31 pm to GynoSandberg
I'm not mad at all. I'm fine with 12. Thought it was discussion worthy. I didn't know what I said 5 years ago would be thrown in my face though.
Page 200 of 211
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News