- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 1/10/12 at 1:56 pm to Lester Earl
Who's dealing today?!?
Konerko and Lind need a home!
Konerko and Lind need a home!
Posted on 1/10/12 at 2:28 pm to Honkus
Honkus YGM.
Posted on 1/11/12 at 8:38 am to EarlyBird
Everyone please go vote on the latest poll if you haven't done so already.
Thanks.
Thanks.
Posted on 1/11/12 at 8:43 am to reddman
done
Posted on 1/11/12 at 9:31 am to PortCityTiger24
done
Posted on 1/11/12 at 9:35 am to barry
Done
Posted on 1/11/12 at 9:42 am to rondo
Done (yes)
Posted on 1/11/12 at 10:34 am to Honkus
Done!
Who voted no and why? Just curious
Who voted no and why? Just curious
Posted on 1/11/12 at 10:36 am to GynoSandberg
probably marle, he's a contrarian
Posted on 1/11/12 at 10:40 am to GynoSandberg
I know of one person that voted no, and said it was because of the wording. He felt that if it only took one person to object to bring a trade to a vote, then there's no use in changing the rule, because he will more than likely object to every trade anyway.
Posted on 1/11/12 at 10:44 am to reddman
I don't think its necessary. Its one fricking day.
I have seen the shady arse shite tgats happened in DAT as a result of a non uniform method for trades to go thru and I didnt like it.
I have seen the shady arse shite tgats happened in DAT as a result of a non uniform method for trades to go thru and I didnt like it.
Posted on 1/11/12 at 10:45 am to reddman
I thought rules changes needed 75% and new rules needed 66% btw
Posted on 1/11/12 at 10:47 am to rondo
quote:
I don't think its necessary. Its one fricking day.
Valid.
quote:
I have seen the shady arse shite tgats happened in DAT as a result of a non uniform method for trades to go thru and I didnt like it.
Not valid.
1. Every trade is still up for a vote if its determined that there needs to be.
2. This ain't DAT. It's TDBL, and everyone in this league has built a reputation that isn't shady, except when Knat made that trade with his buddy before he quit the league. But, he's gone.
Posted on 1/11/12 at 10:48 am to rondo
quote:
I thought rules changes needed 75% and new rules needed 66% btw
No. Rule changes occuring DURING the season require 75%, and rule changes in the offseason require 67%.
New Rules require majority.
This is all in the constitution for reference, btw.
Posted on 1/11/12 at 10:51 am to reddman
Ok
I am fine either way...I do tend to prescribe to a "if it aint broke dont fix it" philosophy though.
I am fine either way...I do tend to prescribe to a "if it aint broke dont fix it" philosophy though.
Posted on 1/11/12 at 10:56 am to rondo
I can see that.
This isn't a vote that I feel strongly about one way or the other. I trust everyone in this league to not collude for the most part, and if they do, I'm fairly confident that we can sniff that shite out and stop it from happening.
That being said, "if it ain't broke don't fix it" is also a good philosophy to have.
This isn't a vote that I feel strongly about one way or the other. I trust everyone in this league to not collude for the most part, and if they do, I'm fairly confident that we can sniff that shite out and stop it from happening.
That being said, "if it ain't broke don't fix it" is also a good philosophy to have.
Posted on 1/11/12 at 10:57 am to reddman
quote:
I know of one person that voted no, and said it was because of the wording. He felt that if it only took one person to object to bring a trade to a vote, then there's no use in changing the rule, because he will more than likely object to every trade anyway.
Must be the guy who objects to every trade
Posted on 1/11/12 at 10:58 am to GynoSandberg
I kinda got that feeling after he told me that. I won't reveal who it is though, since he told me in confidence. If he wants to out himself, then he has the power to do so.
Posted on 1/11/12 at 10:59 am to reddman
Fwiw...I think if we dont have a consistent manner to handle trades it allows for axes to grind and petty shite like that.
There shouldnt be opinions on how rules are applied...it should be in black & white imo
There shouldnt be opinions on how rules are applied...it should be in black & white imo
Page 18 of 211
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News