Started By
Message

re: 2012 TDBL Offseason Thread: Draft Scheduled for March 21st

Posted on 1/11/12 at 11:00 am to
Posted by PortCityTiger24
Member since Dec 2006
87455 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 11:00 am to
Vote has passed
Posted by rondo
Worst. Poster. Evar.
Member since Jan 2004
77515 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 11:00 am to
Is knat banned right now?
Posted by reddman
Member since Jul 2005
78195 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 11:01 am to
I dont think so. He posted yesterday.

Posted by reddman
Member since Jul 2005
78195 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 11:02 am to
quote:

Vote has passed


Not officially. If the three remaining votes all vote no, then only 63% will have voted yes, falling short of the 67% needed.

Posted by rondo
Worst. Poster. Evar.
Member since Jan 2004
77515 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 11:03 am to
I see this creating drama in the future.
Posted by PortCityTiger24
Member since Dec 2006
87455 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 11:04 am to
In honor of knat

LINK
Posted by reddman
Member since Jul 2005
78195 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 11:04 am to
quote:

I see this creating drama in the future


How? The only thing that will change is that trades will be processed immediately. If someone strenuously objects to the trade, it will be put on hold until people vote on it.

Posted by rondo
Worst. Poster. Evar.
Member since Jan 2004
77515 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 11:06 am to
What if a trade happens that i am against but dont have the ability to get to a computer in 5 minutes?
Posted by GynoSandberg
Bay St Louis, MS
Member since Jan 2006
74436 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 11:06 am to
quote:

I see this creating drama in the future.


Just don't be a douche and say "I object!" to every trade and everything will be fine
Posted by reddman
Member since Jul 2005
78195 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 11:08 am to
quote:

What if a trade happens that i am against but dont have the ability to get to a computer in 5 minutes?


Let's say two people WERE trying to be shady, and they agreed to a trade right before the first game of the day happened. I could easily still reverse the deal (and the stats accumulated) if the trade is then ultimately vetoed.

Posted by rondo
Worst. Poster. Evar.
Member since Jan 2004
77515 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 11:09 am to
I'm sorry you cant see my point of view because you fear your rule might not pass.
Posted by PortCityTiger24
Member since Dec 2006
87455 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 11:10 am to
Why so negative?
Posted by GynoSandberg
Bay St Louis, MS
Member since Jan 2006
74436 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 11:12 am to
i dont really care if it passes or not

it was a suggestion and seems like most people agree with it
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
290822 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 11:13 am to
y so contrarian?
Posted by TigerPhan27
edgy racial f'n pervert.
Member since Apr 2008
15693 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 11:17 am to
quote:

Is knat banned right now?


for what?
Posted by rondo
Worst. Poster. Evar.
Member since Jan 2004
77515 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 11:27 am to
Look, I think just about everyone in the league is on the up and up.

I do know that all it will take is one time for this rule to create drama for it not to be worth it IMO. Its one day.

And this league has two constants...1. Its highly competitive 2. There's always drama.

I rarely ever veto trades...It seems you guys are saying I am arguing because I want to veot shite..

I just like to have a uniform way to treat every instance...it takes opinions and butthurtedness out of the equation

As I said, If it passes then fine...I just think it isnt the right move.
Posted by reddman
Member since Jul 2005
78195 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 11:29 am to
There was zero drama last year.
Posted by GynoSandberg
Bay St Louis, MS
Member since Jan 2006
74436 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 11:34 am to
I understand what youre saying

if it doesnt work out, we can always vote to change it back.
Posted by EarlyBird
Member since Jun 2006
4109 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 12:11 pm to
Every trade comes with opinions from the rest of the owners. Sometimes people do not agree with it, but that's not grounds for a veto. Reversing a trade should only happen when collusion is proven. Bad trades (and good ones) are part of baseball. I just try to win 3/4 of my trades yearly.
Posted by reddman
Member since Jul 2005
78195 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 12:12 pm to
Trade me Greinke, fgt.
first pageprev pagePage 19 of 211Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram