- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: ACS Risk Biomarkers significantly increase after MRNA COVID-19 vaccines
Posted on 11/25/21 at 9:32 am to sledgehammer
Posted on 11/25/21 at 9:32 am to sledgehammer
quote:
CoMpLeTeLy SaFe VaCcInE
Don’t forget effective ! Safe AND effective.
1
Posted on 11/25/21 at 9:39 am to RyanMartin835
Bio markers in my Aussie accent.
Posted on 11/25/21 at 9:40 am to MeatCleaverWeaver
quote:
Safe AND effective.
It is neither of these two.
Posted on 11/25/21 at 11:47 am to themunch
So did I read this right?
TLDR; your 5 year chance of having acute coronary syndrome increases a minimum of 127% after one shot. The numbers continue to climb for months after 2nd shot. Therefore, people getting the vaccine may be screwed harder than we though long term which is why That’s the FDA has requested a court order to seal Pfizer data until 2076
TLDR; your 5 year chance of having acute coronary syndrome increases a minimum of 127% after one shot. The numbers continue to climb for months after 2nd shot. Therefore, people getting the vaccine may be screwed harder than we though long term which is why That’s the FDA has requested a court order to seal Pfizer data until 2076
Posted on 11/25/21 at 11:56 am to RyanMartin835
Once again, this is the same article by that the quack doctor Steven Gundy wrote.
It's based off of an single author (Steven Gundy) and wasn't peer reviewed.
Not saying the vaccine doesn't have issues, but this guy is the televangelist of doctors.
It's based off of an single author (Steven Gundy) and wasn't peer reviewed.
Not saying the vaccine doesn't have issues, but this guy is the televangelist of doctors.
Posted on 11/25/21 at 11:59 am to Diamondawg
quote:
So this one wouldn't make it?
Why not read IT and decide for yourself.
Inflammation and endothelial dysfunction contribute mightily to ACS.
The biomarkers of inflammation more than double for 2,5 months.
What do you derive from that. It is from AHA. Smells like science to me.
Posted on 11/25/21 at 11:59 am to Diamondawg
quote:
Why don't you just go find the lengthy thread on this and link it?
AI bots from Sonic franchise owners doin work.
Posted on 11/25/21 at 12:22 pm to IslandBuckeye
quote:I don’t have a problem with the abstract. What’s missing is when they got back to normal and how many in their study actually had cardiac events during that 2.5 months. I bet they did 4 or 5 month follow up and they saw normals. Seems like important data points but that’s just me.
Inflammation and endothelial dysfunction contribute mightily to ACS.
The biomarkers of inflammation more than double for 2,5 months.
What do you derive from that. It is from AHA. Smells like science to me.
Posted on 11/25/21 at 12:49 pm to Diamondawg
quote:
Seems like important data points but that’s just me.
Your condescension is noted and chuckled over.
Were those designated endpoints (cardiac events) of the study? I did notice that they were. I read it was a study of biomarkers. Which is what I commented on.
Maybe it is just you, expecting more than what the study was designed for. Maybe if you wait for it, further analysis will be available with the methods that you expected.
Did you open Christmas presents early as a child? Is your life filled with disappointment as a result?
quote:
I bet they did 4 or 5 month follow up and they saw normals
Stay away from the ponies.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News