Started By
Message

re: SI: Why Does MLB Still Allow Synchronized, Team-Sanctioned Racism in Atlanta?

Posted on 10/28/21 at 9:04 am to
Posted by Lawyered
The Sip
Member since Oct 2016
29696 posts
Posted on 10/28/21 at 9:04 am to
quote:

The name “Braves” is bad enough. Fans might see it as honoring Native Americans, but in equating them to Tigers and Cardinals, it dehumanizes them.


Does It really? Does anyone truly care about this ?

If you let this affect you, you are so fragile and Need to find a hobby or something
Posted by Bert Macklin FBI
Quantico
Member since May 2013
9180 posts
Posted on 10/28/21 at 9:07 am to
quote:

The name “Braves” is bad enough. Fans might see it as honoring Native Americans, but in equating them to Tigers and Cardinals, it dehumanizes them.


Does It really? Does anyone truly care about this ?

If you let this affect you, you are so fragile and Need to find a hobby or something


To this I say what about the Cowboys, Raiders, Buccaneers, 49ers, Steelers, Brewers, Lakers, Astros, Packers, and the littany of other professional and college mascots that represent people of different races and/or professions?
Posted by RedPop4
Santiago de Compostela
Member since Jan 2005
14453 posts
Posted on 10/28/21 at 9:12 am to
The origin of "Braves" goes back 110 or so years, when the club was in Boston. The owner, at the time, was an entrenched member of the Tammany Hall organization, a quasi-political/mob group. Often, members of Tammany Hall were described as "Braves."

Good article from the Society of American Baseball Research (SABR)

Chicanery was the order of the day in baseball for the first number of decades.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram