- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: So lets pretend Taysom had Jameis' 2 game production thus far
Posted on 9/20/21 at 3:51 pm to Chad504boy
Posted on 9/20/21 at 3:51 pm to Chad504boy
We will see Taysom as starting QB by game 8.
Jameis is Jameis. All the Saints tards on this forum really thought Jameis was going to be...not himself.
"A yEaR oF PaYtOn AnD BReEs" they said.
They really thought he wasn't going to be the same player he's been since his redshirt sophomore year at FSU.
Which is a bumbling, stumbling, inaccurate cornball.
Jameis is Jameis. All the Saints tards on this forum really thought Jameis was going to be...not himself.
"A yEaR oF PaYtOn AnD BReEs" they said.
They really thought he wasn't going to be the same player he's been since his redshirt sophomore year at FSU.
Which is a bumbling, stumbling, inaccurate cornball.
1
Posted on 9/20/21 at 4:01 pm to DomincDecoco
quote:
Im no crablegs fan but adding 5 td's and 1-1 should be considered.
With that, he stays the starter imho
of course jameis does.
now, go read the op and answer that.
Posted on 9/20/21 at 4:03 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
Every Jameis hater - BlacknGold on 9/12/21 at 5:49 pm
Can suck a fricking dick. Chad boy eat your heart out. WE BAAAAAAAACK!!!! ...
and I still stand by it.
eta: your point is premature anyway. we are missing almost enough starters to field one side of the ball and were missing the majority of our coaching staff.
It must be miserable to hope for failure to help propel your stances.
This post was edited on 9/20/21 at 4:05 pm
Posted on 9/20/21 at 4:09 pm to BlacknGold
quote:
eta: your point is premature anyway. we are missing almost enough starters to field one side of the ball and were missing the majority of our coaching staff.
It must be miserable to hope for failure to help propel your stances.
would not have mattered to you had taysom been starting. the taysom haters would have not accepted such pitiful excuses, its clear that is exactly what taysom is regardless of circumstances.
Posted on 9/20/21 at 4:11 pm to BlacknGold
We will win next week's game. And things will get back to normal. There is no way this line plays like this next week.
Actually I think this was the worst I've seen that unit play by alot. Jameis had 2 seconds to throw the ball.
It's almost takes that long with no one there at all. Craziest thing ever. We do need another receiver thou.
Actually I think this was the worst I've seen that unit play by alot. Jameis had 2 seconds to throw the ball.
It's almost takes that long with no one there at all. Craziest thing ever. We do need another receiver thou.
Posted on 9/20/21 at 4:16 pm to Chad504boy
Winston is what he is, not very good. The problem is neither is Hill.
Posted on 9/20/21 at 4:18 pm to Chad504boy
you are using stats in a vacuum instead of the actual game footage that tells the story.
If Taysom had those stats with the way our line played last week, you'd see the same threads thrashing the 0-line play.
If Taysom had those stats with the way our line played last week, you'd see the same threads thrashing the 0-line play.
Posted on 9/20/21 at 4:20 pm to BlacknGold
quote:
that tells the story.
i tried to tell the story too but nobody was interested.
quote:
If Taysom had those stats with the way our line played last week, you'd see the same threads thrashing the 0-line play and calling for taysom to never see the qb room again.
Posted on 9/20/21 at 4:23 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
I know had Taysom had been the starting qb of that green bay game, it would be stated repeatedly a million times the game was won because of the outstanding defensive performance on the field.
Then you truly don't know sh!t. That first game would have been a great flawless game for anyone under center.
Passer rating of 130.8.
Do better chad.
This post was edited on 9/20/21 at 4:27 pm
Posted on 9/20/21 at 4:45 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
it really doesn't matter. Taysom accounted for 4 td's his first 2 starts last year. One of jameis's td passes to kamara shouldn't even be considered a td pass. point is, be honest, it wouldn't matter to you either if taysom was having this production.
Do you even fantasy football?????
My God.
Posted on 9/20/21 at 4:47 pm to VictoryHill
quote:
We will see Taysom as starting QB by game 8.
Jameis is Jameis. All the Saints tards on this forum really thought Jameis was going to be...not himself.
"A yEaR oF PaYtOn AnD BReEs" they said.
"wE wILl SeE TAySoM aS StARtiNG Qb"
LOL had to do it.
Posted on 9/20/21 at 4:49 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
the taysom haters
You are like deranged leftist who build a angry over the top false narrative to make their crappy, emotional and poorly thought out points.
"You picked JW over Taysom...you are a Taysom hater."
Posted on 9/20/21 at 4:52 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
So lets pretend Taysom had Jameis' 2 game production thus far
259 passing yds thru 2 games
59.5% completion %
31st in passing yds
2 could have been 3 int's
complete disarray in the pocket under pressure
There couldn't be one person defending taysom, aside from me, who could justify him starting another game correct? Every mean thought and career damning opinion of taysom would then be justified because of these outings correct? He would only be a gadget guy and should never walk in a qb room again right? After all, he had all 6 of the supposed NFL starts to show his talent right? (not 5 + years of starting)
thats a rock solid truth bomb there but the mouth breathing sunshine pumpers will reply with nothing but what ifs and you dont know thats
Posted on 9/20/21 at 5:28 pm to keakar
quote:
thats a rock solid truth bomb there but the mouth breathing sunshine pumpers will reply with nothing but what ifs and you dont know thats
Bingo
Posted on 9/20/21 at 6:18 pm to Chad504boy
Here comes Chad with the "only look at these stats and nothing else" take to justify benching jameis after his oline got completely dominated.
You can't ask someone to judge a meal without letting them try everything on the plate Chad.
You can't ask someone to judge a meal without letting them try everything on the plate Chad.
Posted on 9/20/21 at 6:35 pm to whatiknowsofar
quote:
Here comes Chad with the "only look at these stats and nothing else" take to justify benching jameis after his oline got completely dominated.
Not doing any of the such. But you can only deflect and try to twist.
Posted on 9/20/21 at 6:43 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
Not doing any of the such.
Literally posting a "see how bad jameis is with my cherry picked stats you guys would bench taysom if this was Taysom" thread.
You already know the main reason Jameis looked bad last game wasn't his fault. You're just still butthurt that a guy that knows more than you ever will about football didn't pick your qb.
Posted on 9/20/21 at 6:55 pm to Chad504boy
Hey Chad, your take is pitiful.
Posted on 9/20/21 at 7:31 pm to fischd1
quote:
Hey Chad, your take is pitiful.
Careful. He’ll bust out his alters to disagree with you.
Posted on 9/20/21 at 7:41 pm to whatiknowsofar
quote:
Literally posting a "see how bad jameis is with my cherry picked stats you guys would bench taysom if this was Taysom" thread.
You already know the main reason Jameis looked bad last game wasn't his fault. You're just still butthurt that a guy that knows more than you ever will about football didn't pick your qb.
So busy defending jameis and this ain’t even about him much.
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News