re: 2nd plane from an angle I had not seen.

quote:

---

I'll check it out. Interestingly, none of the "clowns" who responded can explain why thermite was found in the debris:

---

Alright. Let’s take a look at this scientific paper.

1) What kind of scientific study is even considered on samples that were given to the researchers 6 years after the collapse? Not kept in a sterile environment. Kept by ordinary people showing it to everyone who asks what that jar is on the mantle.

2) I point to the part of “ Other peaks included calcium, sul-fur, zinc, chromium and potassium. The occurrence of these elements could be attributed to surface contamination due to the fact that the analysis was performed on the as-collected surface of the red layer.”

Outright admission of contamination of the sample.

3). That paper never states the stuff is thermite. No where. I looked three times. It said it reminded them of it. That’s it. Elsewhere it said they didn’t even try to identify what it was. Only that they would like to compare it with an actual sample.

4). They keep alluding to the concentration of Iron oxide (rust) and aluminum in the sample…. Well.. these were triple digit floor buildings with iron, steel, and aluminum in the structure. There may have been a little of that in the rubble.

5) the paper basically makes no conclusions. None. There are maybes. Perhaps. Reminds them of. Etc. Nothing conclusive.

Ok. Let’s look at some logic.

-if there was thermite in the building around the beams…. How did it stand as long as it did? Thermite melted beams would have resulted in collapse MUCH sooner than it actually happened.

-how did they get a boatload of it in the building unnoticed? Applied to the columns? Any records of construction work that was invasive enough to get to the columns? Any witnesses to torn down and replaced walls? Remember… the buildings had center support columns as well as the perimeter. So they would be walking through offices to place it.

-how did a thermite substance not simply explode when exposed to the burning jet fuel? And simply result in subsequent explosions after the crash?

That’s a garbage paper that the folks that published it should be embarrassed by.