- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: So why didn’t Griff trade Zo for Lauri at the deadline?
Posted on 8/20/21 at 7:32 pm to TigerinATL
Posted on 8/20/21 at 7:32 pm to TigerinATL
quote:
I'd rather have Satoransky and a 2nd than feel pressured to overpay Markennan because the Pels "gave up Lonzo" to get him.
Why would be pressured to overpay him? Are the bulls going to overpay him? He had no market this year. Seems like the Bulls will get him on the one year QO for a pretty good value while our options were an overpaid bad contract Ball, or an expiring Sato and overpaid Temple.
Think I’d rather see how Lauri would have fit this year on the QO or on a Hart like deal…..
This post was edited on 8/20/21 at 7:33 pm
1
Posted on 8/20/21 at 9:15 pm to Townedrunkard
quote:
Why would be pressured to overpay him?
Because the reason people are upset about the Lonzo trade is they think the Pels should have gotten a 1st for him. So trading Lonzo for Lauri would be like trading a 1st for him. That sunk cost makes the team feel it needs to keep him and gives the player leverage. We see it all the time in the NBA.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News