Mike Lindell has the proof. Spread the word. We are going to take our election system back

I’m certain that Lindell believes he has proof.

August is just a month away!

In

I'll believe it when The Gateway Pundit reports on it.

Every Democrat can take an oath swearing that they DID cheat and the election was rigged. And nothing would happen. Nothing.

quote:

---

jeff5891

---

quote:

---

BeepNode

---

it’s over all right

I watched the interview and really didn't see anthing about what he will do or say (very vague referenes to packets). It seems less informative, more like an advertisement for people to come.

If this were serious I think this would be revealed differently, in a conference room, limited attendance, a vetted attendee list of people from all sides of the spectrum. Doing it this way seems to be leading up to just a lot of shouting down people, picketing, signs, chants, etc., rather than a true search for the truth.

And why the wait for 50 days if he has everything he needs.

This seems like a big show or rally they want to do.

Oh and he says that "our country was attacked by China" during the recent election. Well if so, shouldn't the Republicans be the people faulted, since Trump was in charge back then?

Newsweek -
LINK

And about those packet captures

The claim is that Lindell was provided with a set of files on the 9th of January, and gave these to some cyber experts to verify. These experts identified them as packet captures. The video contains scrolling hex, and we are told that this is the raw encrypted data from the files. In reality, the hex values correspond very clearly to printable ASCII, and appear to just be the Pennsylvania voter roll. They're not encrypted, and they're not packet captures (they contain no packet headers).

20 of these packet captures were then selected and analyzed, giving us the tables contained within Exhibit 12. The alleged source IPs appear to correspond to the networks the tables claim, and the latitude and longitude presumably just come from a geo-ip lookup of some sort (although clearly those values are far too precise to be accurate). But if we look at the target IPs, we find something interesting. Most of them resolve to the website for the county that was the nominal target (eg, 198.108.253.104 is www.deltacountymi.org). So, we're supposed to believe that in many cases, the county voting infrastructure was hosted on the county website.

Unfortunately we're not given the destination port, but 198.108.253.104 isn't listening on anything other than 80 and 443. We're told that the packet data is encrypted, so presumably it's over HTTPS. So, uh, how did they decrypt this to figure out how many votes were switched? If Mike's hackers have broken TLS, they really don't need to be dealing with this.

In summary: yes, any supreme court decision on this would be 9-0, just not the way he's hoping for.

Analysis from internet security sleuth Mike Garret
LINK /