- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Now that players are getting paid for NIL should they have to pay for tuition ?
Posted on 7/1/21 at 2:20 pm to LNCHBOX
Posted on 7/1/21 at 2:20 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
The schools would rightfully be torched in the PR arena if they tried to make the move you suggest. It's an idea only slightly less terrible than OP's. 99.9% of NCAA athletes will see extremely little to zero benefit from NIL.
I don't believe so. Athletes are making demands that they be given the right to make money off of NIL, and also the right to transfer without being forced to sit out a year. Both of which I support.
However, the schools will invest in an individual to help develop them, win, and get them to the next level. That individual can now jump ship to a better team without any financial recuperation for the losing institution. I believe that there should be some mechanism setup that allows for anyone to transfer to anywhere, but makes it less likely due to a buyout clause of some sort.
2
Posted on 7/1/21 at 2:26 pm to RRBengal
quote:
I don't believe so
Well that just reinforces my comments from earlier in this thread about how ridiculous this thread is.
quote:
However, the schools will invest in an individual to help develop them, win, and get them to the next level. That individual can now jump ship to a better team without any financial recuperation for the losing institution.
So what? Coaches, trainers, admin all can leave whenever they choose, why does the athlete need to be stuck? That makes no logical sense other than that's how it used to be. Why when the athletes get a just a little piece of the pie do people like you want to punish them for it?
quote:
I believe that there should be some mechanism setup that allows for anyone to transfer to anywhere, but makes it less likely due to a buyout clause of some sort.
The "buyout" is any remaining scholarship funds they'd have used in the future at that institution. What you want is a penalty, and you give absolutely zero good reason for it.
Posted on 7/1/21 at 2:32 pm to RRBengal
Is this currently a possible scenario out there in wild:
Chemistry major on full scholarship has a youtube channel that does at home experiments and other science content. They make money from the channel. Maybe they get bigger and get paid to go on a science program, or they get sponsored by DOW Chemical or something.
Should that student's scholarship be brought under the microscope and potentially negatively impacted? Is it now, and if not, would it have to be in your scenario? If not, why not?
Chemistry major on full scholarship has a youtube channel that does at home experiments and other science content. They make money from the channel. Maybe they get bigger and get paid to go on a science program, or they get sponsored by DOW Chemical or something.
Should that student's scholarship be brought under the microscope and potentially negatively impacted? Is it now, and if not, would it have to be in your scenario? If not, why not?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News