- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The Overblown Oath Keepers Indictment
Posted on 6/21/21 at 1:29 pm
Posted on 6/21/21 at 1:29 pm
From a retired Department of Defense Senior Analyst:
The recently released Federal grand jury indictment of the Oathkeepers was almost certainly unsealed so it could be used as a divert the public's attention away from the unfolding email scandal of Dr. Anthony Fauci.
It is likely that hundreds of thousands of Americans perished unnecessarily as a result of Dr. Fauci's dubious medical advice on lock downs and the use prophylactic drugs. Additionally, various emails show Fauci's claims about the origins of the virus were pre-mature and may have been a CYA move over the NIH's (indirect) funding of the Wuhan lab's gain of function virus research.
What better way to divert attention away than to put out an overblown prosecutorial document that fans the flames of the false narrative that Trump supporters are domestic extremists.
As is the case with many indictments, the prosecutors wove pieces of irrelevant information together and used innuendo to create a conspiracy theory alleging the Oathkeepers began planning to disrupt the electoral college vote in November and all of their actions in the lead up to January 6th were part of a coordinated effort.
The Justice Department knows its case is weak. Consider this statement from prosecutor Kathryn Rakoczy:
"We do not have, at this point, someone explicitly saying, 'Our plan is to storm the Capitol to stop certification'"
The prosecution's conspiracy theory that the Oathkeepers intended to attack the Capitol is severely compromised by the evidence presented in the indictment. The case gets completely obliterated when exculpatory evidence (not in the indictment) is presented.
What really happened?
The evidence in the indictment supports that the Oathkeepers came to Washington DC to attend the Stop The Steal rally and were making preparations in defense of anticipated attacks by Antifa counter-protestors.
From revealthestealblogspot.com
LINK
The recently released Federal grand jury indictment of the Oathkeepers was almost certainly unsealed so it could be used as a divert the public's attention away from the unfolding email scandal of Dr. Anthony Fauci.
It is likely that hundreds of thousands of Americans perished unnecessarily as a result of Dr. Fauci's dubious medical advice on lock downs and the use prophylactic drugs. Additionally, various emails show Fauci's claims about the origins of the virus were pre-mature and may have been a CYA move over the NIH's (indirect) funding of the Wuhan lab's gain of function virus research.
What better way to divert attention away than to put out an overblown prosecutorial document that fans the flames of the false narrative that Trump supporters are domestic extremists.
As is the case with many indictments, the prosecutors wove pieces of irrelevant information together and used innuendo to create a conspiracy theory alleging the Oathkeepers began planning to disrupt the electoral college vote in November and all of their actions in the lead up to January 6th were part of a coordinated effort.
The Justice Department knows its case is weak. Consider this statement from prosecutor Kathryn Rakoczy:
"We do not have, at this point, someone explicitly saying, 'Our plan is to storm the Capitol to stop certification'"
The prosecution's conspiracy theory that the Oathkeepers intended to attack the Capitol is severely compromised by the evidence presented in the indictment. The case gets completely obliterated when exculpatory evidence (not in the indictment) is presented.
What really happened?
The evidence in the indictment supports that the Oathkeepers came to Washington DC to attend the Stop The Steal rally and were making preparations in defense of anticipated attacks by Antifa counter-protestors.
From revealthestealblogspot.com
LINK
This post was edited on 6/21/21 at 1:39 pm
Posted on 6/21/21 at 1:31 pm to TS1926
this doesn't seem like clickbait bullshite at all
Posted on 6/21/21 at 1:32 pm to TS1926
It no longer matters what the truth is... the government will massage it to fit their needs...
Posted on 6/21/21 at 1:32 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
this doesn't seem like clickbait bullshite at all
What it scares you because it doesn't fit the narrative you like?
Posted on 6/21/21 at 1:35 pm to TS1926
quote:
his doesn't seem like clickbait bullshite at all
Instead of popping off about it tell us what's not true and why it's just clickbait?
Posted on 6/21/21 at 1:35 pm to TS1926
quote:
What it scares you because it doesn't fit the narrative you like?
no
effectively blind links to blogspot do scare me, though
Posted on 6/21/21 at 1:36 pm to TS1926
quote:
Instead of popping off about it tell us what's not true and why it's just clickbait?
are you or your family in any way associated with the link you just posted?
Posted on 6/21/21 at 1:37 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
no
effectively blind links to blogspot do scare me, though
If I edit and put the title above the link would you feel better? I posted almost the whole thing here.
Posted on 6/21/21 at 1:39 pm to SlowFlowPro
Liar. The truth is what scares you.
Posted on 6/21/21 at 1:39 pm to SlowFlowPro
No of course not. Did you read anything in the post?
Posted on 6/21/21 at 1:41 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
effectively blind links to blogspot do scare me, though
You are scared? Really?
Posted on 6/21/21 at 1:44 pm to GumboPot
It looks like he can't refute the points in the posts so the next best thing is attack the messenger.
Posted on 6/21/21 at 1:45 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
this doesn't seem like clickbait bullshite at all
Kill that messenger.
Posted on 6/21/21 at 1:49 pm to SlowFlowPro
The worst click bait is The good guys at DNI have a high ranking defector.
If this were true AND they were going to do something different with the info then Hunter's laptop. Or James Comey didn't have the chicom spies file in his home safe.
We would know about it.
Where is Durham, do you know?
If this were true AND they were going to do something different with the info then Hunter's laptop. Or James Comey didn't have the chicom spies file in his home safe.
We would know about it.
Where is Durham, do you know?
Posted on 6/21/21 at 1:50 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
The good guys at DNI have a high ranking defector.
DNI has one now? I mean DIA having one is a big deal, but one at DIA and another at DNI is just awesome...
Posted on 6/21/21 at 1:52 pm to The Maj
Neither will do Bo Diddily about it if they do have Dong.
This post was edited on 6/21/21 at 1:53 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News