Started By
Message

re: Why do American Christians support Israel?

Posted on 5/18/21 at 5:53 pm to
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46628 posts
Posted on 5/18/21 at 5:53 pm to
Another important point is that the percentage of any population that desires to blindly rape, murder, etc. other members of society is very small. The vast majority of people do not require religious or supernatural incentive to not be violent criminals. Indeed, studies from across the globe over the last century have consistently shown crime and incarceration rates among the non-religious are much lower than they are for the religious even when accounting for conversion after the crimes in question. Atheists, particularly western atheists, commit violent crimes at such a low rate as to be almost statistically insignificant. In Sweden, for example, you’re likely to have 7 Christians or 19 Muslims attempt to kill you before the first atheist or agnostic tries.
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
22256 posts
Posted on 5/18/21 at 5:55 pm to
quote:

In Sweden, for example,




Try that here.
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
141701 posts
Posted on 5/18/21 at 5:56 pm to
That’s it. Imma be an atheist now.

Those poor people in Sweden.
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46628 posts
Posted on 5/18/21 at 5:59 pm to
quote:

What’s the hidden assumption there? The borrowed capital from Christianity: human value and dignity, and that society should flourish.


First, I don’t have to value anyone’s dignity or their life to abide by these rules. I just simply have to value my own life. Without these rules, I will suffer as much as anyone else. Second, why could this not be rooted any of the other religions that espouse the same, including many that predate Christianity?

Could it be that humans desire to not die and have some semblance of social stability, and they’ve molded various belief systems around that desire?

quote:

What makes you think Stardust must flourish?


Stardust isn’t sentient. Some of the products of it are.

quote:

Who are you to argue with me?


Who are you to argue with the people who lived long before either of us and any modern religions who sought similar things? Did they come up with this Christian worldview by looking into the future?

quote:

All you have is preference, societal convention.


Sure, but the alternative is societal collapse. This is true regardless of what worldview you use to arrive at the conclusion. The only difference is you make unfounded assumptions about where that worldview originated.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
51161 posts
Posted on 5/18/21 at 6:01 pm to
Because they're the best nation in the middle east and actually have respect for other people's beliefs.
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46628 posts
Posted on 5/18/21 at 6:02 pm to
quote:

Try that here.


We have essentially the same enlightenment produced, macro cultural norms as they do. This conversation isn’t about implementing Swedish policy here or vice versa, it’s about the nature of respective worldview, where they come from and what they produce.

In America the numbers are similar, Sweden just has the most comprehensive data on the topic
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
22256 posts
Posted on 5/18/21 at 6:06 pm to
quote:

it’s about the nature of respective worldview, where they come from and what they produce.


Yeah, and you're trying to claim religion produces murderers because Sweden. Culture produces murderers, and other than your baseless claim I've seen nothing that suggests a Christian is just as likely to murder someone in Sweden as anybody else, especially a Muslim.

It sure ain't Christian culture here that produces violence.
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46628 posts
Posted on 5/18/21 at 6:09 pm to
quote:

Why are you saying that human beings should be the ones that flourish, who are the random results of evolutionary processes, and not dogs and snails and horses? Why aren’t you fighting for them? Why are you fighting for humans?


Because I’m a human and not a dog or a snail or a horse. And if I were such a creature, I’d lack the cognitive capability of even pondering the question. Snails and dogs and horses don’t even recognize their own existence, they are not sentient beings. I care about humans because only humans are troubled with the issue to begin with, and because we’re all programmed to work towards our own survival. Our behavior is dictated by millions of years of evolutionary selection for certain traits.
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
22256 posts
Posted on 5/18/21 at 6:12 pm to
quote:

Our behavior is dictated by millions of years of evolutionary selection for certain traits.


What is it that tells use to keep babies with mental and physical defects alive? It ain't evolution, that's for sure.
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46628 posts
Posted on 5/18/21 at 6:12 pm to
quote:

and you're trying to claim religion produces murderers because Sweden


Wrong, I’m saying religion doesn’t prevent violence. THAT’S the point, not that increased rates of violent crime are caused by religion. Other things such as poverty, wealth and education also correlate with religiosity and are more directly related to the perceived correlation between religiosity and crime. It’s obviously not the religion (in most cases, with obvious exceptions most commonly seen in Islamic extremism) that accounts directly for the violence.

quote:

It sure ain't Christian culture here that produces violence.



I never claimed otherwise, I was arguing against the claim that only a Christian worldview is what prevents everyone from being a violent criminal on a whim.
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
141701 posts
Posted on 5/18/21 at 6:14 pm to
Do you preach at an atheist church?
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
22256 posts
Posted on 5/18/21 at 6:15 pm to
quote:

I was arguing against the claim that only a Christian worldview is what prevents everyone from being a violent criminal on a whim.


Who made that claim?
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46628 posts
Posted on 5/18/21 at 6:15 pm to
quote:

What is it that tells use to keep babies with mental and physical defects alive?


In most cases, the societal consequences of not doing so. When society allows us to avoid this, such as with early detection followed by abortion, the data shows the majority of people take the out. Yes, even a large percentage of Christians. But the social consequences of killing a 3 month old with autism or Down syndrome generally outweigh the benefits of doing so, and so we cover ourselves with the veil of altruism at that point. The reality is that most such parents would opt out of this given a realistic choice free of consequence. A majority of human societies in history discarded “defective” infants and children pretty readily unless they came from high social classes.

It’s not a fun thing to talk about, but reality doesn’t care about our feelings as they say. It’s why religion is so much more comfortable to believe.
This post was edited on 5/18/21 at 6:19 pm
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46628 posts
Posted on 5/18/21 at 6:18 pm to
ctiger, his claims is that anyone who doesnt rape and murder is stealing from a Christian worldview whether they realize it or not. I was just pointing my to the absurdity of that claim.
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
22256 posts
Posted on 5/18/21 at 6:22 pm to
quote:

In most cases, the societal consequences of not doing so


You're chasing your tail. There are societal consequences because people care about it, but your worldview doesn't explain why they care about. Presumably even you care about, but you can't explain why. They are unquestionably a drag on society if you take morality out of the equation. If evolutionary pressures were really about society thriving we'd be letting them die as babies.
Posted by caleb07
Member since Dec 2018
761 posts
Posted on 5/18/21 at 6:28 pm to
So, you are for Hamas? Figures. They want to wipe us off the map also.
This post was edited on 5/18/21 at 6:31 pm
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46628 posts
Posted on 5/18/21 at 6:43 pm to
quote:

Presumably even you care about, but you can't explain why.


My rational brain understands we’d be better off not devoting resources to these individuals. My monkey brain has evolved under selective pressure for some semblance of human empathy so that I don’t go around killing everyone I meet (as previously discussed). What we call morality absolutely has evolutionary roots. That doesn’t mean it’s always rational. The same reason why I have the ability to feel compassion for my fellow man that leads to productive societies always leads me to feel objectively unjustified compassion for individuals who are a net drain on society.

quote:

If evolutionary pressures were really about society thriving we'd be letting them die as babies.



They’re about staying alive and reproducing. I cannot reproduce from prison or if society falls apart entirely and we all die. The reason laws work is because we have an evolutionary aversion to being locked up, being executed by the state or society collapsing. Those who cannot abide by basic societal structures and laws have their traits, such as excess aggression, selected against because they won’t reproduce as well as the rest of us. Over time this weeds out the genetic tendency towards certain behaviors.
This post was edited on 5/18/21 at 6:48 pm
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
22256 posts
Posted on 5/18/21 at 7:24 pm to
So your theory that morality is driven by evolution is impossible to falsify. If it obviously supports a "thriving" society then the theory is supported, if it doesn't obviously support a thriving society then monkey brain mumble mumble societal costs. Do you know what they call theories that can't be falsified? Not theories.

Incidentally, it's a criticism frequently leveled, not unfairly, at various religious worldviews and claims, because those aren't strictly scientific theories. But you're in the same boat here.
Posted by Craig86
Florida
Member since Oct 2012
1602 posts
Posted on 5/18/21 at 7:29 pm to
Guys can we get back on the Israel topic I think this thread got derailed somewhat I was having an entertaining time reading about the Israel Palestine conflict but I fear we won’t get back to it.
Posted by TNTigerman
James Island
Member since Sep 2012
10571 posts
Posted on 5/18/21 at 8:30 pm to
quote:

It’s called,” Replacement Theology.”
Some people think that once the Jews rejected Jesus as the Messiah and salvation was offered to the Gentiles, God turned his back on the Jews and the church became the the new people of God.
It goes against a myriad of scriptures and simply ignores all of them that say God will one day restore Israel and the blinders currently on their eyes will be lifted and they will all believe.
This Replacement Theology is embraced by White Supremest groups like the KKK and people like David Duke who feel that White Anglo Saxons are Gods chosen ones.

For all of those "Replacement Theologians" not you Revelator), study all of the very specific prophecies about 1) the Jews returning to the land in the last days after a dispersion to the four corners of the Earth where they experienced terrible persecution everywhere they went, 2) the transformation of the land after two millennia of barren desolation - only to occur when the Jews have returned, 3) a nation born in a day (May 14, 1948) followed by birth pangs after the child is delivered, 4) the dry bones in Ezekiel's vision which came together and became an "exceedly great army" (Ezekiel ch. 37), and 5) reviving their ancient Hebrew tongue. There's more, but start with those and let us know if you still believe God is done with the Jews.
Jump to page
Page First 10 11 12 13 14 ... 20
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 12 of 20Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram