- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: A not too kind assessment of the F-35 program.
Posted on 2/24/21 at 12:39 pm to UndercoverBryologist
Posted on 2/24/21 at 12:39 pm to UndercoverBryologist
I'll never understand the military brass thinking it was better to have one plane be shitty at a bunch of things instead of many planes being great at one thing each.
Posted on 2/24/21 at 12:42 pm to IAmNERD
quote:they dont care it isnt their money or their lives.
I'll never understand the military brass
Posted on 2/24/21 at 12:44 pm to IAmNERD
quote:
I'll never understand the military brass
Here's how you understand the military brass:
Just about every single one of them is jockeying for a board seat on one of the big defense contractors. And they will do whatever's necessary to make that happen.
There are exceptions, but they are few and far between.
Posted on 2/24/21 at 6:26 pm to IAmNERD
quote:
understand the military brass thinking it was better to have one plane be shitty at a bunch of things instead of many planes being great at one thing each.
maintaining and parts.
your staff only needs to know one plane. pilots only need the same training. so training modules less.
saving money on parts inventory, training, equipment. really big savings
and no one really said it would be shitty.
I would like to see the lisr of issues stated in terms of its requirements.
This post was edited on 2/24/21 at 6:30 pm
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News