- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Any scholars care to advise me on how 66k minors voted in GA
Posted on 1/17/21 at 8:11 am to arseinclarse
Posted on 1/17/21 at 8:11 am to arseinclarse
quote:
They didn’t
This aggrevates me. I have been trying for several weeks to prove or disprove this.
The State just says "it didnt happen" No proof of investigation, no proof of results.
I am pretty sure the 66k came from data provided by SOS that goes back to mail in ballots that were sent out. Trump cant prove that they voted but the state can't prove or wont show that they didnt.
In the end, the states incompetence is so high that half the people will forever think the election was rigged.
They will blame everybody but they are the only ones at fault. Either they botched the election or they botched the PR after the fact. Its one or the other and both are in the States control.
1
Posted on 1/17/21 at 8:13 am to jonnyanony
quote:
At least according to GA's SoS
You take the word from their counsel while they are complicit in the act?
Did they allow for a forensic audit? Why not?
Did they allow for signature verification? Why not?
Did they allow for truly "fair and transparent" election? Why not?.......b/c you liked the outcome?
Posted on 1/17/21 at 8:13 am to jonnyanony
The problem is that the Georgia Secretary of State has no credibility. When you read the link it’s says we have only found 3 or 4 for each allegation. Well that means that the shenanigans did occur then and maybe you have not investigated enough to nail them all down. Why would the SOS ever admit he failed at his job? He would if he had honor and integrity but those are outdated concepts in this brave new world. My state is now represented by two completely embarrassing senators who now sit where man like Sam Nunn sat. Whatever you want to say about Sam (yes he was a democrat) at least he was a man of substance. Now I have a boy with a serious learning disability and a guy who ran over his wife’s foot representing me. Lord have mercy.
Posted on 1/17/21 at 8:14 am to Statestreet
Posted on 1/17/21 at 8:17 am to arseinclarse
Any Fulton county lawyers want to grab that exhibit?
Posted on 1/17/21 at 8:20 am to arseinclarse
quote:
grab that exhibit?
That would awesome. It's a piece that I have been trying to find.
Posted on 1/17/21 at 8:21 am to arseinclarse
A link to a report by Peter Navarro??? You got to be kidding.
If they have a number that is true then they should have a list of names that matches.
How can the SOS be expected to verify Navarro’s number if Navarro can’t give him a list?
How did Navarro concoct this number??
Watch the contortionist answer these questions.
If they have a number that is true then they should have a list of names that matches.
How can the SOS be expected to verify Navarro’s number if Navarro can’t give him a list?
How did Navarro concoct this number??
Watch the contortionist answer these questions.
Posted on 1/17/21 at 8:22 am to arseinclarse
What is the source ?
Posted on 1/17/21 at 8:23 am to jonnyanony
quote:
At least according to GA's SoS:
the same guy that refuses to show anyone the ballots and it shredding them
Posted on 1/17/21 at 8:24 am to wt9
quote:
This aggrevates me. I have been trying for several weeks to prove or disprove this. The State just says "it didnt happen" No proof of investigation, no proof of results. I am pretty sure the 66k came from data provided by SOS that goes back to mail in ballots that were sent out. Trump cant prove that they voted but the state can't prove or wont show that they didnt.
Here’s the issue. Trump can claim anything he wants. If what he’s claiming isn’t true, then there’s nothing the state can show you to prove he is lying bc there are no 66k underage voters to prove either way. If trump supplied names or some amount of evidence, then that could be cross checked, but they haven’t.
You guys don’t trust the election folks bc trump tells you everyone is a liar and part of a deep state. They could release the names and addresses of every person that voted and the conspiracy folk would just say that they scrubbed the underage voters from the list.
The reality is that it would be impossible to have 66k underage people vote and none of them get on tiktok bragging about it. It would be impossible for 66k underage people to vote and not one trump loving person in the election chain somewhere leak the evidence.
The whole claim falls apart when you look at the difficulty of pulling it off in a world where everyone shares everything. Not to mention the fact that everyone involved in the election from bottom to top says the claims are not true.
Posted on 1/17/21 at 8:24 am to TigerFred
The source is the report through Exhibit 3 which OP has called 3 times for assistance to get it posted here.
Posted on 1/17/21 at 8:27 am to CollegeParkDawg
quote:
When you read the link it’s says we have only found 3 or 4 for each allegation. Well that means that the shenanigans did occur then and maybe you have not investigated enough to nail them all down.
That’s how I read their statement as well. It’s not “we checked every voter and there was none.”
Posted on 1/17/21 at 8:29 am to TigerFred
Exhibit 3 of the lawsuit I attached. The exhibits are not included in the pdf. I don’t have access to Fulton county court records remotely.
Posted on 1/17/21 at 8:31 am to TigerFred
The footnotes references lawsuits filed with the same allegations but no evidence. You know the many lawsuits filed in many courts that state and federal judges rejected. One footnote was to a letter Navarro wrote to a newspaper.
Talk about circular references.
Talk about circular references.
Posted on 1/17/21 at 8:35 am to JDGTiger
quote:
You know the many lawsuits filed in many courts that state and federal judges rejected. One footnote was to a letter Navarro wrote to a newspaper.
You do realize that evidence was never presented and/or the defendants never responded. They simply filed exceptions and had the cases kicked out by the courts.
So your assumption that evidence was heard by the court is as ignorant as it gets.
This post was edited on 1/17/21 at 8:36 am
Posted on 1/17/21 at 8:35 am to JDGTiger
I say 1000000 people voted for Trump in Louisiana that were not counted. I can’t prove it but the SOS says it didn’t happen.
Who do you believe?
Who do you believe?
Posted on 1/17/21 at 8:37 am to ChipDiamond
quote:
The reality is that it would be impossible to have 66k underage people vote and none of them get on tiktok bragging about it. It would be impossible for 66k underage people to vote and not one trump loving person in the election chain somewhere leak the evidence.
Or 66k minors got voted for and had no clue it happened.
This post was edited on 1/17/21 at 8:41 am
Posted on 1/17/21 at 8:39 am to 2geaux
quote:
18 is the voting age. Still minors.
Biden voters, ladies and gentlemen.
Posted on 1/17/21 at 8:43 am to JDGTiger
quote:
One footnote was to a letter Navarro wrote to a newspaper.
Jesus Posted on 1/17/21 at 8:43 am to JDGTiger
quote:
How can the SOS be expected to verify Navarro’s number if Navarro can’t give him a list?
I think it’s aka an audit. That part he specifically refused.
Page 2 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News