- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
What evidence did the democrats present today that Trump incited a riot?
Posted on 1/13/21 at 8:53 pm
Posted on 1/13/21 at 8:53 pm
Surely they have a transcript of him telling people to do violence and they presented it as evidence prior to their vote?
This post was edited on 1/13/21 at 8:54 pm
10
Posted on 1/13/21 at 8:55 pm to Niccolo Machiavelli
Zeeeeeero
Posted on 1/13/21 at 8:55 pm to Niccolo Machiavelli
Their evidence is CNN and MSNBC. They come up with a narrative call their friends in the media and have them tell the masses. It’s amazing to me what this country has become!
Posted on 1/13/21 at 8:57 pm to Niccolo Machiavelli
Orange Man Bad. That’s the evidence
Posted on 1/13/21 at 8:57 pm to Niccolo Machiavelli
You know they have no evidence because they aren't blasting a video of him doing so. They are just making shite up and the transcript and timing of events proves it.
Democrats are a sad, hopeless, morally bankrupt bunch of frauds.
Democrats are a sad, hopeless, morally bankrupt bunch of frauds.
Posted on 1/13/21 at 8:58 pm to MeatCleaverWeaver
Did they have standing to present it?
Posted on 1/13/21 at 9:31 pm to Niccolo Machiavelli
If someone speaks to a large crowd and then that large crowd immediately invades a federal building, one can safely assume the speaker had something to do with it.
Posted on 1/13/21 at 9:33 pm to Tigerfan6969
Invades while he is still speaking. But I'm confused how if he incites a riot then how was Parler banned for organizing the riot.
Posted on 1/13/21 at 9:33 pm to Tigerfan6969
quote:
If someone speaks to a large crowd and then that large crowd immediately invades a federal building, one can safely assume the speaker had something to do with it.
only if you are a fricking moron who does not know what Post hoc ergo propter hoc is
Now run along and look it up guilty white boy.
Posted on 1/13/21 at 9:33 pm to Tigerfan6969
quote:
someone speaks to a large crowd and then that large crowd immediately invades a federal building, one can safely assume the speaker had something to do with it.
Not from where he was speaking, wasn't immediate.
Plus I thought it was pre planned.
Yall need to get your accusations in line.
Posted on 1/13/21 at 9:34 pm to Tigerfan6969
quote:
someone speaks to a large crowd and then that large crowd immediately invades a federal building, one can safely assume the speaker had something to do with it.
Good thing that’s been debunked by the actual timeline of events
Posted on 1/13/21 at 9:40 pm to dgnx6
It's a good thing the technology hasn't been invented yet to listen to someone talk at another location, because how else would it be possible for someone standing at the Capitol to also be listening to a speaker in another location???
Posted on 1/13/21 at 9:48 pm to Tigerfan6969
quote:
Tigerfan6969
You haven’t even listened to what he said for yourself, you’re assuming because that’s what you were told what to think. Stop being a stupid fricking sheep
Posted on 1/13/21 at 10:30 pm to Tigerfan6969
White privilege. Altar and a bad one at that. Run along little boy grown ups are talking. 
Posted on 1/13/21 at 11:02 pm to Tigerfan6969
quote:
If someone speaks to a large crowd and then that large crowd immediately invades a federal building, one can safely assume the speaker had something to do with it.
Does that apply to democrats, including Biden & Kamala visiting with protesters last summer where as soon as the democrats left the rioters began trying to burn down federal courthouses?
Are democrats responsible for the riots since they encouraged and supported the rioters?
Posted on 1/13/21 at 11:03 pm to Niccolo Machiavelli
He's a man. He's orange. And he's bad.
Posted on 1/13/21 at 11:07 pm to Tigerfan6969
quote:
If someone speaks to a large crowd and then that large crowd immediately invades a federal building, one can safely assume the speaker had something to do with it.
Just a federal bldg? No other kinds of bldgs? Just to be clear...
Posted on 1/13/21 at 11:09 pm to Jeff Boomhauer
quote:
Does that apply to democrats, including Biden & Kamala visiting with protesters last summer where as soon as the democrats left the rioters began trying to burn down federal courthouses?
Are democrats responsible for the riots since they encouraged and supported the rioters?
YES
This post was edited on 1/13/21 at 11:11 pm
Posted on 1/13/21 at 11:18 pm to Niccolo Machiavelli
They don't need no stinking evidence! OMB!
Posted on 1/13/21 at 11:24 pm to Niccolo Machiavelli
They did not include any examples of his language in the supposed “incitement.”
There’s a reason they didn’t.
There’s a reason they didn’t.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News