Started By
Message

re: General security camera discussion (was "Unifi Protect security cameras")

Posted on 8/18/21 at 3:00 pm to
Posted by shawnlsu
Member since Nov 2011
23682 posts
Posted on 8/18/21 at 3:00 pm to
Well my UA-Pro died during a firmware update today.
No response from Ubiquiti yet. Will give them until tomorrow before I start jumping up and down.
Posted by Hopeful Doc
Member since Sep 2010
15019 posts
Posted on 8/29/21 at 3:38 pm to
Update:
I have purchased 6 G4p cameras. I have mounted four of them. When deciding finally how to mount them, I took a picture and found something I didn’t realize was there- a fairly substantial anchor for my soffit that was super easy to drill through and mount to:


This gave me a ton more freedom than needing to be where other support beams were and prevented me from having to use other ways to secure it, and it is super secure.


Here is one mounted (resized my actual image; the quality isn’t very good, but it’s what you’re getting):



This camera points down an alley, so I mounted it on the “outside” of the soffit (it’s still fully covered). The others are pointed more directly “out,” so I mounted them on the inner rail.


Overall, I’m pretty happy with the turnout. G4p camera quality is great. The microphone quality is almost scary- my wife and I had a conversation in the driveway at normal conversational tone, probably 25 feet (and about 3-4ft below where the camera is mounted), and the audio is crystal clear.


My other two mounts are going to be a bit more challenging- I’m going to have to go blindly through some corrugated blue vinyl that is the ceiling on my two patios (these cameras will look from the corner of my front and back porch looking “down” the entirety of the porches and catching the doors. I’m going to either need a really strong magnet or my wife’s assistance. I’m still enjoying my g3 Instant for what it is. It’s going to wind up on a table top giving an inside view of a door. I will probably grab a 3pack of the g3 Flex sometime in the next 6m and have an interior view of each door +/- a nursery view (tabletop, not permanently installed. have a Nanit monitor but used the g3 instant in this role for a while before moving the baby. And I don’t want permanently installed interior cameras as I think that could be a question mark when the next guy buys this house).
Posted by Hopeful Doc
Member since Sep 2010
15019 posts
Posted on 9/4/21 at 7:39 pm to
quote:

The slightly harder, but still really easy way. This is what I did. Completely free for me. Put Ubuntu on an old spare computer. Download the free homebridge image and follow the step by step instructions on the website to install it to Ubuntu. Use the GUI to install the plugin. Then use the GUI to input the info for your unifi stuff (IP, credentials, etc). Done. Now your unifi cameras are on homekit



HFS. I had no idea that doorbells could be displayed on TV. But I installed this (a few tiny headaches, but it didn’t take much to figure out. The child bridge code being somewhat hidden and not realizing I didn’t have ffmpeg on this computer).


This was incredibly easy and fairly game changing. I had bought two Unifi phones thinking the “push” notifications from the g4 Protect doorbell would work on them (it doesn’t). This is way better.



And now I have linked all the things that worked with my Alexa that weren’t HomeKit enabled. This was an incredibly helpful post,
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
28730 posts
Posted on 10/12/21 at 2:16 pm to
Chris at Crosstalk just put out a new video which kinda sorta introduces a new G4 Doorbell Pro by way of analyzing another video. The doorbell itself seems pretty awesome, it of course has the front facing camera but also a secondary downward facing package camera. Also looks to have a fingerprint scanner, presumably for integration with the rumored UI door lock and maybe also Access.

But Chris spends the majority of the video talking about Ubiquiti's weird marketing tactics of late, specifically the video he watches where the guy is supposedly a random unknown youtuber who happened to get his hands on an unannounced product before anyone else. He also goes over another channel the Ubiquiti attempted something similar with.

I just wish they were able to keep product in stock. I realize everyone has shortages, but it seems much worse with Ubiquiti.
Posted by Hopeful Doc
Member since Sep 2010
15019 posts
Posted on 10/14/21 at 7:56 pm to
quote:

Chris at Crosstalk just put out a new video which kinda sorta introduces a new G4 Doorbell Pro by way of analyzing another video. The doorbell itself seems pretty awesome, it of course has the front facing camera but also a secondary downward facing package camera. Also looks to have a fingerprint scanner, presumably for integration with the rumored UI door lock and maybe also Access.




That's certainly an interesting video. I don't think I would consider that uprade. i love my g4 doorbells.
Posted by gpburdell
ATL
Member since Jun 2015
1425 posts
Posted on 10/15/21 at 9:54 am to
quote:

I had no idea that doorbells could be displayed on TV.


Have you considered using the Unifi Viewport? I'm considering getting one of those for the living room TV when I build out my camera system. Would make it very easy to see all the cameras just by changing the input on the TV.

Also, it looks like the G4 instant is at the FCC for approval. I hope that means a G4 Flex is coming as well.
Posted by Hopeful Doc
Member since Sep 2010
15019 posts
Posted on 10/15/21 at 12:56 pm to
quote:

Have you considered using the Unifi Viewport?



I should probably rephrase:
My main TV-viewing experience is through an app on an AppleTV. My options are AppleTV or Firetv. The firetv app is less refined for whatever reason (it doesn’t like pause/fwd/rewind commands), so I use an AppleTV for my cable company’s app.
This setup now puts an overlay of a doorbell press over the AppleTV interface- live video of the person at the doorbell pops up in the corner of the screen! Because I am always/only using an AppleTV now, basically, I now get a pop up anytime my tv is on which is pretty darn neat (it pains me to give credit to that company. It really does. And it requires a workaround. But the concept and underlying architecture is theirs. Credit given where due).

There is also a Unifi protect app on AppleTV. It’s quite functional but has some small downfalls (second by second scrubbing is weak, no way to jump event to event , but overall it is pretty good. And unlike mobile apps, it’s pretty stable). So I have always been able to flip inputs/apps and get to my cameras on the tv with pretty steady results (and some amount of timeline scrubbing).

I love Ubiquiti, but the viewport isn’t on my radar for home use.
- an AppleTV is cheaper
- ATV has other functions including, as explained, a pop up when someone actually rings my doorbell.

If you have a standard cable box or use some other device, yes- a viewport would require fewer clicks to get to what you want. My understanding is that you can create views on it, but there’s no control over anything but a live view. So, if you hear something and flip over, you can see what’s on. But you can’t back up a minute or two and see what happened on a viewport. To pay more to not do that given my dependence on ATV as a cable box just doesn’t fit. I have thought about a dedicated video monitor (and you can even build “views” that swap which camera is displayed every so often, both serving as a way to view all the cameras and a way to prevent burn in), but there’s so little control (from what I gather), that it just isn’t going to do as good a job for me.



Please don’t read: OMG Apple is awesome.



quote:

Also, it looks like the G4 instant is at the FCC for approval. I hope that means a G4 Flex is coming as well.


G4 flex is unofficially announced - they wrote something about the skins for the g3 fitting the g4. They are generally poor at marketing and have a lot of “phantom” products it seems. Or things that are announced but never see daytime (a black UDM with PoE was one that was in the design software for a while). I would be super excited about a g4 instant.



Special note:
G4 Pro cameras along with the PTZ are “high-bandwidth” cameras and actually have a much lower limit than the “total camera” limit. They don’t give firm numbers on the number supported, but my UDMP is doing fine with 6x g4p, 2 g4 doorbells, and one instant. I get warnings about not adding anymore though.


I also spent a solid 2 weeks trying to convince myself of the pros/cons of adding hardwired electric locks and installing Access in my house. I still think my wife would let me, but I don’t want to retrofit it. I would probably put Access in a new construction if I were doing it though. I have a totally irrational hatred of batteries. And then also the added UDMP resource drain may not like my camera load (according to ubiquiti)
This post was edited on 10/15/21 at 12:58 pm
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
28730 posts
Posted on 10/27/21 at 9:32 am to
Dahua and Hikvision equipment has been banned from US government sites for a while, but now Home Depot, Best Buy, and Lowe's have pulled Lorex and Ezviz (Dahua and Hik) products from stores. But while the government banned them for security reasons, these retailers have dropped them for human rights and ethical reasons.

I don't know the exact relationship between these companies and the Chinese government, but in any case they work very closely together to say the least. Police all over China use these cameras to keep an eye on their cities, and they have developed AI software to recognize and track ethnic minorities, specifically Uyghur muslims.

Uniview is the 3rd largest camera manufacturer in China, and so far they haven't come under the same scrutiny as the other two. However they have also been caught developing software to identify Uyghurs and they are also known to supply cameras to Chinese police. Uniview has recently been my top choice for low cost, high quality cameras, but it's hard to vouch for them if they are doing all the same stuff.

Another well-known Chinese brand is Reolink. I haven't read of any links whatsoever between them and the Chinese government nor of any human rights issues, though given the price of their gear I find it hard to believe they aren't getting funding from sources other than sales.


So while Dahua, Hik, Uniview, and all their white label resellers offer better price/performance than Ubiquiti (Reolink is obviously cheaper but IMO the quality makes them less of a value), if these security and ethical issues enter your value equation then it might bump Ubiquiti to the top of the value list. AFAIK every other manufacturer that is not involved with the Chinese government is even more expensive than Ubiquiti.

Posted by CarRamrod
Spurbury, VT
Member since Dec 2006
57479 posts
Posted on 10/27/21 at 10:47 am to
So the G4pro just got in stock, buti cant stomach paying 450 for a single camera. What do you think i should get? i need, 3 for certain but could up to 5 with cheaper ones.

Posted by Azazello
Member since Sep 2011
3185 posts
Posted on 10/27/21 at 11:27 am to
I'm about to bail on my unifi security dreams - I really need a new security system based on a string of robberies in my neighborhood over the past few months and I am tired of waiting.
Posted by CarRamrod
Spurbury, VT
Member since Dec 2006
57479 posts
Posted on 10/27/21 at 12:13 pm to
what are you looking for?
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
28730 posts
Posted on 10/27/21 at 12:40 pm to
quote:

So the G4pro just got in stock, buti cant stomach paying 450 for a single camera
Yeah me neither. I think they are worth around that much, I just don't think many homes need that much camera.
quote:

What do you think i should get? i need, 3 for certain but could up to 5 with cheaper ones.
I honestly have no idea at this point. None of them are ever in stock. Looks like their distributors won't get any more stock until Q1 of next year, so UI is the only seller right now. Might have to hit ebay or ubiquiti groups on facebook and overpay for the cheaper models. Since I started this thread I've begun a little side business installing cameras, and I've been doing almost strictly Uniview. They have protected sales channels so the dealer pricing that I get is far below MSRP and usually significantly cheaper than you can find on sites like B&H. The UI/UX on the desktop and mobile apps is garbage compared to Ubiquiti, but at least there is stock available and you get good video. Also they are ONVIF so should be easy to integrate with BI or Frigate or whatever if that's your thing.
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
28730 posts
Posted on 10/27/21 at 12:49 pm to
quote:

I'm about to bail on my unifi security dreams - I really need a new security system based on a string of robberies in my neighborhood over the past few months and I am tired of waiting.
Yeah the waiting is painful. If you can't wait anymore, I would say go ahead and put in some cheap cameras so at least you've got something more immediate, and then your cabling will already be run so you can sell your stuff and install unifi later if you still want it. I've been through a lot of different systems, and they all have their weaknesses and faults, but IMO Ubiquiti still has the best combination of user experience and value for residential.
Posted by Hopeful Doc
Member since Sep 2010
15019 posts
Posted on 10/27/21 at 6:25 pm to
quote:

G4pro just got in stock, buti cant stomach paying 450 for a single camera



I can’t recommend the picture on these things highly enough.

Can only compare to the g4 doorbell (I THINK it’s the same sensor as thr g4 dome) and the g3 instant, but it’s a DAMN good picture, and I would happily pay the price again. I think these things are going to be in service a long time.
Posted by Azazello
Member since Sep 2011
3185 posts
Posted on 10/27/21 at 7:29 pm to
quote:

what are you looking for?



I need 4 outdoor cameras to cover the back of my house and separate garage. Plan on buying the G4 doorbell as an upgrade to my Nest.
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
28730 posts
Posted on 10/27/21 at 8:28 pm to
quote:

I can’t recommend the picture on these things highly enough.

Can only compare to the g4 doorbell (I THINK it’s the same sensor as thr g4 dome) and the g3 instant, but it’s a DAMN good picture, and I would happily pay the price again. I think these things are going to be in service a long time.

I haven't tested one in person, but the footage I've seen from them does look mighty fine. Again I will say I think they are worth the price if you need or want it.


Side note: Flex skins are in stock! I just grabbed a 3pk of black and a 3pk of camo.
Posted by CarRamrod
Spurbury, VT
Member since Dec 2006
57479 posts
Posted on 10/27/21 at 9:17 pm to
Kork, are you running Protect? It seems mine is SO slow. It is t my internet as I have gig fiber, but just seems like it takes a good 30-60 seconds to get to my live video or a motion video right when I get the alert.
Posted by Hopeful Doc
Member since Sep 2010
15019 posts
Posted on 10/27/21 at 9:55 pm to
quote:

Side note: Flex skins are in stock!



If the Flex had been in stock when I went down this rabbit hole, I may have needed these. In the end, no regrets. But that was an awfully frustrating waiting game with the in/out of stock for each camera.

Ramrod:
I have a UDMP with protect. From a doorbell alert I’m 10-15 seconds from live video. There’s something screwy with remote viewing in general though. I’m currently out of town and have 100mb bidirectional (actual benchmark. No clue what the speed they pay for here is). My G4p actually struggle to stream smoothly in the protect app on iPhone (a screenshot is clear. Downloaded video is clear. But the stream view on my phone is super slow and bogged down). G4 doorbell loads in seconds. ETA- it’s actually much better and faster on cellular for some odd reason

Another odd finding: I used the method described earlier in the thread and have a homebridge server on a desktop linking these cameras to HomeKit. I have a slightly longer delay on my 3 cameras that allow me to speak (g3 instant, doorbell x2) in getting the feed to start through HomeKit- it’s 6-10 seconds. But when I hit “talk,” I can hear my voice come through almost instantly.
When I use the Protect mobile app, I get a much longer delay- sometimes 15-20 seconds after I speak before I can hear the echo of my voice on the camera’s end.

I still notice my doorbell feeds are pretty responsive remotely. But my camera stream response from the G4p are less than desirable. I’m debating an SSD vs convincing the wife that I need an NVR or NVRP (I’ve come close to maxing out the budget of her tolerance on cameras and camera talk). Yes- SSD were not designed to be used in NVR. But if you search the topic, particularly on Reddit, many people find they get a very improved response and a predicted SSD life that’s still well within reason (many suggest the SSS would last a decade or more based on the amount of data written/read and the published mean time to failure for the specific SSDs used)
This post was edited on 10/27/21 at 10:27 pm
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
28730 posts
Posted on 10/28/21 at 12:03 am to
quote:

Kork, are you running Protect? It seems mine is SO slow. It is t my internet as I have gig fiber, but just seems like it takes a good 30-60 seconds to get to my live video or a motion video right when I get the alert.
As Doc suggested I think it all boils down to disk i/o, and I hope Ubiquiti can make some major improvements here. It clearly doesn't perform as well as some other systems when starting up video. I obviously don't know exactly how they currently handle the various processes, but my guess is it has to do with the way Protect generates thumbnails and timeline scrubbing. Most NVRs don't do all that, they just write the incoming h265 streams straight to disk, and read it straight from disk to stream to the client. There is almost no processing involved in this, and it's pretty easy on the storage too. To make a timelapse, the NVR has to first write the h265 to disk, then decode it (possibly after reading it back from disk), then apply the transforms, then encode the timelapse, then write that back to disk. That's at least 3 compute-intensive steps plus extra disk i/o. Even using hardware encoder/decoder that's a lot of data to shuffle around. Cams like Nest and Ring that record to the cloud are able to utilize basically unlimited resources to do this quickly, but I'm not willing to sacrifice free local 24/7 recording for that benefit.

I don't use Protect at home yet. I do manage 3 sites running it, but I don't typically use notifications. I've done a little bit of testing and yeah performance is pretty slow, but I wonder if that's because I'm tapping the notifications right away rather than waiting 5-10 minutes to give the NVR time to finish up all the steps listed above for that section of video. Again I hope they can optimize this, but similar to above I'm not willing to sacrifice the timelapse feature for better notification response time in case they can't optimize it.
Posted by CarRamrod
Spurbury, VT
Member since Dec 2006
57479 posts
Posted on 10/29/21 at 9:20 am to
quote:

As Doc suggested I think it all boils down to disk i/o,
ok well i do have the shittiest HHD i had put into it right now. I didnt have the money to drop of a good NVR drive.
Jump to page
Page First 9 10 11 12 13 ... 21
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 11 of 21Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram