Started By
Message

re: Is it always best to put 20% down on a house to avoid PMI?

Posted on 11/20/20 at 9:33 am to
Posted by Decisions
Member since Mar 2015
1489 posts
Posted on 11/20/20 at 9:33 am to
I was not expecting this to be such a heated debate!

It’s pretty simple math, as another poster said, to analyze what your total cost is going to be of putting the extra money down vs. not.

What’s not simple is determining your risk tolerance and how much you could be making off of that money in other investments.

I used to be in the “pay debt off quickly if able, put the 20% down” group. Now I’ve shifted to “let the leverage and debt work for me, just don’t get overextended”. Where is “overextended”? That’s a great question with a host of different answers.

Congrats on being in this situation, regardless. It sounds like you’ve been working hard and have your head in a good place if you’re trying to learn these things so early!
Posted by Jag_Warrior
Virginia
Member since May 2015
4127 posts
Posted on 11/21/20 at 11:08 am to
quote:

just don’t get overextended”. Where is “overextended”? That’s a great question with a host of different answers.


Excellent observation.

Given his age, I’ll guess that if/when wifey and kiddo come along, this won’t be the “forever” house. So the PMI (which is just throwing money away) may not be a long term detriment. And even if he does hang onto the house longer term, with a reasonable downpayment + appreciation, he may be able to get out if it soon enough anyway.

But as you accurately pointed out, it’s a balancing act. And I would view the PMI as the cost of having access to the cash that he’s not putting down.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram