- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: I think Louisiana has a voter reading comprehension problem with the Amendments *updated*
Posted on 10/24/20 at 12:46 am to DiamondDog
Posted on 10/24/20 at 12:46 am to DiamondDog
As stated, I'm fairly well educated and versed in this stuff (probably pretty avg for this board)...and I make sure to read each amendment 3 times and think for a minute what im reading.
I get the context of the proposal, but The main problem is the overtly legal jargon causes you to second guess whether you are for or against it.
On that thought, using For/against would probably solve the issue instead if yes/no
I get the context of the proposal, but The main problem is the overtly legal jargon causes you to second guess whether you are for or against it.
On that thought, using For/against would probably solve the issue instead if yes/no
This post was edited on 10/24/20 at 12:52 am
3
Posted on 10/24/20 at 1:02 am to SportTiger1
quote:
On that thought, using For/against would probably solve the issue instead if yes/no
They do that to confuse the issue and try to get you to vote the way the writers want.
Posted on 10/24/20 at 1:17 am to SportTiger1
quote:
As stated, I'm fairly well educated and versed in this stuff (probably pretty avg for this board)...and I make sure to read each amendment 3 times and think for a minute what im reading.
I get the context of the proposal, but The main problem is the overtly legal jargon causes you to second guess whether you are for or against it.
Exactly. And the site I read that went into detail was really great. It actually left me on the fence on yes/no based on their explanation.
Which is why I legit thought that no debate out of the commission was a for sure no. If both sides have good points, then that’s something that can/should be debated and become a compromise.
It’s how this should work.
Posted on 10/24/20 at 7:11 am to SportTiger1
quote:
stated, I'm fairly well educated and versed in this stuff (probably pretty avg for this board)...and I make sure to read each amendment 3 times and think for a minute what im reading.
I deal with legalese most days at work. I find these confusing at times though too.
I really liked the Rainy Day Fund question. I voted against being able to tap it. This State just wants to be flat broke. They get a nickel and they just have to spend it.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News