- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump lost Pennsylvania Monday
Posted on 10/20/20 at 12:43 am to MMauler
Posted on 10/20/20 at 12:43 am to MMauler
I, too, was initially scared at the possibility, but to pull off massive fraud like that is much harder than it sounds.
First, the list of names have to be verified as having not voted this year (and not dead) which won't be known until after polls close. Time consuming.
2nd, the ballot has to be filled out and signed with that person's name. Time consuming.
3rd, the post-mark has to be skillfully/credibly imperfect. Time-consuming.
4th, there will be poll watchers to verify & convince of fraud-less activity. Otherwise, the cabal of ballot-makers & ballot-counters could just make up numbers.
5th, a truckload of 20,000 imperfect post-marked ballots suddenly all arriving over 3 days would be highly scrutinized & contested.
Is it possible? yes. Improbable? most likely.
First, the list of names have to be verified as having not voted this year (and not dead) which won't be known until after polls close. Time consuming.
2nd, the ballot has to be filled out and signed with that person's name. Time consuming.
3rd, the post-mark has to be skillfully/credibly imperfect. Time-consuming.
4th, there will be poll watchers to verify & convince of fraud-less activity. Otherwise, the cabal of ballot-makers & ballot-counters could just make up numbers.
5th, a truckload of 20,000 imperfect post-marked ballots suddenly all arriving over 3 days would be highly scrutinized & contested.
Is it possible? yes. Improbable? most likely.
3
Posted on 10/20/20 at 12:50 am to LSUFreek
quote:
4th, there will be poll watchers to verify
Verify WHAT?
The Dims just need a list of those who didn't vote. The fraudulent ballots will come from that lists. There's no way to show or verify that the people on the voter rolls who didn't vote at the precinct on November 3rd didn't send in their ballots on November 3rd, 4th, 5th or 6th.
quote:
5th, a truckload of 20,000 imperfect post-marked ballots suddenly all arriving over 3 days would be highly scrutinized & contested.
This will be coordinated and will happen all over the state at heavy Dim precincts.
WHY DO YOU THINK THAT THE DIMS TOOK THIS ALL THE WAY TO THE SUPREME COURT?
Do you really think that they just want to make sure that "every ballot is counted" -- whether it be Republican or Democrat?
Do you really believe that Dims are against Voter I.D. because they believe it's racist? If so, you must believe like the Dims that blacks are too stupid, lazy and ignorant to figure out the simple task of getting a state issued I.D. card -- something that they need to get through life with.
Massive f*cking Voter Fraud is what the Dims do. Anyone over the age of 18 should already realize this.
This post was edited on 10/20/20 at 12:53 am
Posted on 10/20/20 at 4:58 am to LSUFreek
quote:
Nah, relax. It's been stated they have to be post-dated by Nov 3rd.
quote:You are badly underestimating what is afoot.
I, too, was initially scared at the possibility, but to pull off massive fraud like that is much harder than it sounds.
Think about it. Who would even consider submitting a proposal that NON-POSTMARKED ballots turning up days after the election be counted?
The answer ... someone who knows how to take advantage of such a system. All one needs to do is payoff a couple of postal workers running the route between a major post office and the mail-in vote repository.
It wouldn't even put the mailman in much jeopardy. Parties would identify an address for package delivery along the route. Mailman leaves truck to deliver the package. Democrat thug slips a 3ft stack of ballots in the truck while the mailman is doing the delivery.
Insofar as postmark requirements, creating an imitation postmark is incredibly simple ( LINK). The extraordinarily lax standards of "illegible or nonexistent postmarks" means mail with a simple computer generated counterfeit pm would easily pass muster.
Posted on 10/20/20 at 6:52 am to LSUFreek
quote:
, too, was initially scared at the possibility, but to pull off massive fraud like that is much harder than it sounds.
First, the list of names have to be verified as having not voted this year (and not dead) which won't be known until after polls close. Time consuming.
2nd, the ballot has to be filled out and signed with that person's name. Time consuming.
3rd, the post-mark has to be skillfully/credibly imperfect. Time-consuming.
4th, there will be poll watchers to verify & convince of fraud-less activity. Otherwise, the cabal of ballot-makers & ballot-counters could just make up numbers.
5th, a truckload of 20,000 imperfect post-marked ballots suddenly all arriving over 3 days would be highly scrutinized & contested.
Is it possible? yes. Improbable? most likely.
All of this assumes that the counters are acting with integrity. History shows that in Dim heavy districts this is not the case.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News