- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Rudy G said Hunter's Attorney contacted asking for the HDD back minutes after story broke
Posted on 10/16/20 at 1:12 am to Korkstand
Posted on 10/16/20 at 1:12 am to Korkstand
quote:
If someone else claimed it was for you and that it had damning evidence about you on it, your lawyer absolutely should ask to see it. If he didn't, you should fire him immediately.
I can't imagine a lawyer even being involved unless you have something to be worried about.
2
Posted on 10/16/20 at 1:18 am to davyjones
quote:Then you should probably tell Trump to get his lawyers to stop blocking the release of his taxes.
I can't imagine a lawyer even being involved unless you have something to be worried about.
Seriously though this might be the dumbest thing I've read on this site, and that's saying a lot.
If you are accused of something, especially of this magnitude, the very first thing you should do is call your lawyer. Welcome to Life 101.
Posted on 10/16/20 at 1:18 am to Korkstand
That would be my legal right to do so once the thing in question became evidence in a trial - called discovery, right.
Until that happens, I don't have any right whatsoever to inspect shite at random no matter what somebody says they have or don't have.
I can have my attorney demand until he fricking drops dead, it doesn't change a thing.
Now if you claim I stole something from you - file a police report stating such and let's go from there. In doing so, you must admit this thing was in fact your property.
Until that happens, I don't have any right whatsoever to inspect shite at random no matter what somebody says they have or don't have.
I can have my attorney demand until he fricking drops dead, it doesn't change a thing.
Now if you claim I stole something from you - file a police report stating such and let's go from there. In doing so, you must admit this thing was in fact your property.
Posted on 10/16/20 at 1:19 am to davyjones
Imagine white knighting for that piece of shite family 
These people are absolute dog shite
These people are absolute dog shite Posted on 10/16/20 at 1:27 am to Korkstand
So just minutes after the story broke Hunter was aware of very serious allegations that he was hearing for the first time, kept his cool and thought it through, and then took the rational step of contacting his attorney who he immediately advised must attempt to retrieve the devices? Nah. He immediately became paranoid, knowing what was potentially about to be made public.
And the comparison with the Trump tax situation is too bad to address.
And the comparison with the Trump tax situation is too bad to address.
This post was edited on 10/16/20 at 1:29 am
Posted on 10/16/20 at 1:28 am to reverendotis
quote:So until then you'd like your lawyer to twiddle his fricking fingers?
That would be my legal right to do so once the thing in question became evidence in a trial - called discovery, right.
quote:And he should.
I can have my attorney demand until he fricking drops dead
Regardless, asking or demanding to see supposed evidence does not in any way validate it. Very often that could mean the opposite. This is known as "calling a bluff".
Posted on 10/16/20 at 1:30 am to Korkstand
quote:
Don't know why anyone would take this as some sort of verification.
Posted on 10/16/20 at 1:30 am to Korkstand
quote:
Korkstand
Posted on 10/16/20 at 1:31 am to davyjones
quote:A nice theory, and you may even be right. But having a lawyer ask to see some evidence does not in any way validate it.
So just minutes after the story broke Hunter was aware of very serious allegations that he was hearing for the first time, kept his cool and thought it through, and then took the rational step of contacting his attorney who he immediately advised must attempt to retrieve the devices? Nah. He immediately became paranoid, knowing what was potentially about to be made public.
quote:You're the one who said you just couldn't imagine lawyers being involved unless there was something to worry about. Do you stand by that?
And the comparison with the Trump tax situation is too bad to address.
Posted on 10/16/20 at 1:33 am to Korkstand
quote:
If someone else claimed it was for you and that it had damning evidence about you on it, your lawyer absolutely should ask to see it.
Asking to see damning evidence against your client is one thing...Asking to get it back is another.
I guess we will have to see the wording in the email.
Posted on 10/16/20 at 1:38 am to auggie
quote:
Libs will just say Hunter's laptop was stolen, Russians planted all that info on the hard drive and then dropped it off at the computer repair shop knowing it would eventually get into hands of the Conservatives.
So, you think that anybody would believe, that if the Russians had these kinds of photos and stuff on a candidate's son, that they could use to blackmail that candidate in the future, if he got elected, that they would be supporting the other guy? That's funny.
I know, if I was somebody like Putin and I had dirt on Biden's son, I would want to get Biden elected.
I never said what you are inferring. I said what the Libs will do to spin the story. Unfortunately the media will back them up and most of the country will believe the Biden's version of events.
Posted on 10/16/20 at 1:39 am to DMAN1968
Well, they are going to get to see it, along with the rest of us
Posted on 10/16/20 at 1:40 am to DMAN1968
quote:It's data, there is no distinction here. Copies are free.
Asking to see damning evidence against your client is one thing...Asking to get it back is another.
quote:
I guess we will have to see the wording in the email.
Yeah we need to see a lot of shite.
Posted on 10/16/20 at 1:42 am to Korkstand
quote:
You're the one who said you just couldn't imagine lawyers being involved unless there was something to worry about. Do you stand by that?
Yeah, I was of course referring to this particular case with the lawyer remark. Not "I can't imagine a lawyer being involved, in any case, ever."
Look, I will agree that the lawyer thing isn't direct verification or evidence of anything. But it is circumstantial evidence.
Posted on 10/16/20 at 1:43 am to BayouCatFan
quote:
most of the country will believe the Biden's version of events.
Not really, because it's not believable in any way, but OMB and he triggers their feelings, so they will make lame excuses for Biden.
Posted on 10/16/20 at 1:50 am to davyjones
quote:Gotcha, so as usual "if my guy does it it's fine, if your guy does it it's suspect".
Yeah, I was of course referring to this particular case with the lawyer remark. Not "I can't imagine a lawyer being involved, in any case, ever."
quote:No, it's not even that, it's just a lawyer doing the very basics of his job. Any rational and unbiased person can see that.
Look, I will agree that the lawyer thing isn't direct verification or evidence of anything. But it is circumstantial evidence.
Posted on 10/16/20 at 2:02 am to Korkstand
quote:
Gotcha, so as usual "if my guy does it it's fine, if your guy does it it's suspect".
No, man. Good Lord. They're just completely different scenarios. One involves quick emergency action, the other involves a more "structured" planned-out situation.
Much like I wouldn't compare this particular Hunter situation with, say, his recent child support proceedings wherein he had an attorney present.
Posted on 10/16/20 at 2:16 am to davyjones
quote:So, generally, blanket statements are bad is what you're saying? Agreed.
No, man. Good Lord. They're just completely different scenarios. One involves quick emergency action, the other involves a more "structured" planned-out situation.
Much like I wouldn't compare this particular Hunter situation with, say, his recent child support proceedings wherein he had an attorney present.
If you were accused of something with enormous national implications, if it were true you would call your lawyer, but if it were fabricated you would not? Is this your assertion?
Posted on 10/16/20 at 2:33 am to Korkstand
quote:
You're the one who said you just couldn't imagine lawyers being involved unless there was something to worry about. Do you stand by that?
Trump’s lawyers didn’t get involved with tax returns until a suit was filed specifically demanding them. You do know tax returns aren’t public. In fact, if an IRS agent leaks them it is a felony. That is how serious the government is about protecting their privacy.
Yet here you are, comparing Trump engaging lawyers to respond to a filed suit with Biden’s lawyers demanding a hard drive you claim isn’t his within minutes of a newspaper story? How many fake news stories have been run about trump? How many times did his lawyers get involved within minutes of the stories being posted? Or did he just usually say “fake news?”
This post was edited on 10/16/20 at 2:40 am
Posted on 10/16/20 at 4:53 am to Korkstand
Korkstand thought he did something.
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News