re: Matthew Langlois

Who though? Definitely not S prospects because their really weren't any the staff seemed to press for. This is one position I think the lack of a real cycle of recruiting has hurt badly. I like Gee and actually like Langlois but think both could've been recruited over if a true cycle of evaluation had gone through. Think those 2 with Ryan is a solid group and at least more bodies at the position. Maybe we get lucky.

Don't really see any other position targets that we are out in suddenly unless they've been kept secret.
All of our RB targets are still alive if we choose to take another.
Rumors of Thomas but I don't think we've missed and Nabors likely is that spot if we miss on Thomas or Smith.
TE doesn't seem to have anyone after Trigg and no one really expected him.
Our OL targets are still very much in play.
Foreman and Smith are the last real DL targets.
No one knows at LB.
CB is a miss in McKinstry but we've bugun to pressure the FL kid committed to Tennessee lately so it seems that's his spot if he wants it.
S has always been thought to be Mukuba and Davis. Seems we didn't really try at the end for Mukuba and no visit is killing any shite we had with Davis. Terrion Arnold was loosely mentioned but we aren't and never were getting him.