- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Left-Wing News Hired Hitman Charged W/ 2nd Degree Murder Of Patriot
Posted on 10/11/20 at 9:56 am to Tiguar
Posted on 10/11/20 at 9:56 am to Tiguar
quote:This is why it is so difficult to have a conversation with so many of you zealots. You think you are a bloody genius, but you do not even understand that you are asking the WRONG DAMNED QUESTION.
youre trying to shoehorn pepper spray into the great bodily harm definition
It DOES NOT MATTER whether the spray was objectively deadly or near-deadly. The QUESTION was whether having SOMETHING blow up in his face placed the guy in reasonable fear
Hell, you probably STILL do not understand the distinction AFTER it has been explained to you.
3
Posted on 10/11/20 at 10:43 am to AggieHank86
quote:
It DOES NOT MATTER whether the spray was objectively deadly or near-deadly. The QUESTION was whether having SOMETHING blow up in his face placed the guy in reasonable fear
Point taken.
Does No. 2 in the statute you posted cause problems for the shooters self defense claim?
quote:
(2) Deadly physical force may be used only if a person reasonably believes a lesser degree of force is inadequate and:
This is problematic for the defense, no? There were police on the scene. Shooter could have retreated from spray. Etc.
Posted on 10/11/20 at 10:59 am to AggieHank86
quote:
The QUESTION was whether having SOMETHING blow up in his face placed the guy in reasonable fear
The victim was not a Jihadist. Why would he bring a bomb to a slap fight.
The fear of him blowing up the attacker AND himself is not a reasonable one.
Where do you come up with unreasonable scenarios and try to paint them as reasonable. Oh I forgot, that is what lawyers do. Silly me. And you paint us all as knuckle dragging mouth breathers from your perch upon your high horse.
This post was edited on 10/11/20 at 11:00 am
Posted on 10/11/20 at 12:40 pm to AggieHank86
quote:You're correct about the question, but everything I've seen says the shooter was the aggressor and would be hard-pressed to prove that he was in fear for his life. So, right question, but I still think he has little chance of a prevailing defense.
The QUESTION was whether having SOMETHING blow up in his face placed the guy in reasonable fear
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News