Started By
Message

re: UPDATE II| OP: A few questions for James Bond fans

Posted on 10/5/20 at 11:20 am to
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
67213 posts
Posted on 10/5/20 at 11:20 am to
The Connery Bond films are a lot like the Brosnan ones, just with less over the top explosions, and more witty dialogue (still lots of double-entendres and flirty puns).

Hallmarks of the Bond franchise before Craig:
1. Bond bangs every woman he meets, usually through quality pun-manship and being the smoothest man alive

2. Campy, over-the top villain with an overly complicated plan for world domination

3. Campy, over-the top henchman who works for the villain.

4. One of Bond’s sexual conquests works for the bad guy either willingly or against her will.

5. Bond escapes capture through gadget shenanigans and pithy one-liners

6. Nothing is ever taken too seriously, and it’s all for fun.

7. Even the bad ones are fun.

8. Early bonds are all about subtle dialogue and the occasional hidden silenced pistol or sleeper hold. Later Bond movies are all about elaborate chase sequences and dazzling (but now dated) effects.
This post was edited on 10/5/20 at 11:23 am
Posted by VinegarStrokes
Georgia
Member since Oct 2015
13328 posts
Posted on 10/5/20 at 11:30 am to
quote:

Campy, over-the top henchman who works for the villain.


disagree. there is nothing campy about guys who throw their hats at people as weapons or guys with huge metal teeth.
Posted by Athos
Member since Sep 2016
11878 posts
Posted on 10/5/20 at 12:49 pm to
006 wasn’t campy at all. Or the general either.

Onatop I’ll give you, was a campy #2.

I wouldn’t even say Elliot Carver was campy either.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram