Started By
Message

re: Overturning Roe is a losing issue

Posted on 9/19/20 at 12:11 pm to
Posted by YipSkiddlyDooo
Member since Apr 2013
3641 posts
Posted on 9/19/20 at 12:11 pm to
quote:

you understand that all repealing roe v. wade would do is throw the abortion issue back to individual state jurisdiction


The uninformed electorate doesn’t know this, nor will they be informed of this fact by any of the media they consume.

But some federal legal protection for aborting pregnancies is necessary. There are rare instances where terminating a pregnancy is life saving for the mother. You can’t criminalize physicians who decide terminating the pregnancy of a dying preeclamptic woman is in their best interest and offer it as a treatment option. If you could actually limit them to procedures which required medical necessity, you’d have thousands of abortions per year instead of hundreds of thousands. How you do that is the debate we should be having. But people on the left don’t care about the elective killing of babies by irresponsible women and people on the right believe that a mother unnecessarily dying during pregnancy was all a part of Gods plan for her.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
36311 posts
Posted on 9/19/20 at 12:23 pm to
quote:

There are rare instances where terminating a pregnancy is life saving for the mother. 


Depends on what you mean. Most fertilization events end in abortion already, with between 15% to 25% of all pregnancies ending in spontaneous abortion, and the number is probably much higher (maybe even 50%) due to the woman not knowing she was pregnant. I would also suggest that the issues that make pregnancy an even more high-risk event for women have to do with poor health outcomes in general, of which we have many in the US, across all demographics and age groups. We could do better to make pregnancy, which is already a high-risk event, less high-risk, but any top down instruction is received poorly in the US.
Posted by walley tux
DFW
Member since May 2020
794 posts
Posted on 9/19/20 at 12:37 pm to
quote:

But some federal legal protection for aborting pregnancies is necessary. There are rare instances where terminating a pregnancy is life saving for the mother.


all easily legislated and decided at the STATE LEVEL.

quote:

The uninformed electorate


you mean people like you?
Posted by RazorBroncs
Harding Bisons Fan
Member since Sep 2013
13547 posts
Posted on 9/19/20 at 2:31 pm to
quote:

There are rare instances where terminating a pregnancy is life saving for the mother. You can’t criminalize physicians who decide terminating the pregnancy of a dying preeclamptic woman is in their best interest and offer it as a treatment option.

...people on the right believe that a mother unnecessarily dying during pregnancy was all a part of Gods plan for her.



I've lived in the south and been a republican - that also goes to church every Sunday - my entire life... I've never ONCE heard anyone say or espouse this.

NOBODY wants to make medically-necessary abortions illegal, or criminalize the doctors that perform them; at least nobody that I've ever had contact with in any way.

I don't think you're a liberal/Dem based on the context, but this is the kind of misinformed view of pro-life people they run around and villainze people with. Because pro-choice people have a misunderstanding of what the opposing side actually wants and is saying, the two sides will always be at odds.

Most people on the Right that want to overturn RvW simply want to take it back to a state's right to decide and remove the federal government and constitution from the equation. Your misinformed views only serve to further the left's incorrect opinion of us.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram