- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: New Book by Dr. DiLorenzo: The Problem with Lincoln
Posted on 7/9/20 at 10:49 am to theunknownknight
Posted on 7/9/20 at 10:49 am to theunknownknight
quote:He absolutely preserved the Union. But at what cost?
...most conservatives I know refuse to look at all the facts surrounding Lincoln and the Civil War.
Posted on 7/9/20 at 11:00 am to Wolfhound45
quote:
He absolutely preserved the Union.
This is one of the most infuriating arguments about the Civil War to me. The Union was never in danger of dissolving. It was just going to shrink for awhile with fewer states. It's not like if the South succeeded, then suddenly Ohio and Michigan and Maine were gonna go "Whelp, that's it, there's no more Union, better join Canada".
The bitch of it is, with westward expansion, the Union would have grown again. It's not like Southern Independence would have been a death knell. That's crap. What it came down to was not the Union being in danger of dissolving, but America not getting it's shot at being an empire. I've come to see that's what it was about: manifest destiny meant that America was to be the new Rome, and empires don't shrink. They only grow. Thus, the South had to be brought to heel.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News