Started By
Message

re: New Book by Dr. DiLorenzo: The Problem with Lincoln

Posted on 7/9/20 at 10:49 am to
Posted by Wolfhound45
Hanging with Chicken in Lurkistan
Member since Nov 2009
120000 posts
Posted on 7/9/20 at 10:49 am to
quote:

...most conservatives I know refuse to look at all the facts surrounding Lincoln and the Civil War.
He absolutely preserved the Union. But at what cost?
Posted by DesScorp
Alabama
Member since Sep 2017
6593 posts
Posted on 7/9/20 at 11:00 am to
quote:

He absolutely preserved the Union.


This is one of the most infuriating arguments about the Civil War to me. The Union was never in danger of dissolving. It was just going to shrink for awhile with fewer states. It's not like if the South succeeded, then suddenly Ohio and Michigan and Maine were gonna go "Whelp, that's it, there's no more Union, better join Canada".

The bitch of it is, with westward expansion, the Union would have grown again. It's not like Southern Independence would have been a death knell. That's crap. What it came down to was not the Union being in danger of dissolving, but America not getting it's shot at being an empire. I've come to see that's what it was about: manifest destiny meant that America was to be the new Rome, and empires don't shrink. They only grow. Thus, the South had to be brought to heel.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram