- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
if we sign wooten, randle, and bell... WOW
Posted on 7/24/08 at 1:36 pm
Posted on 7/24/08 at 1:36 pm
were gonna have 54564187646 recievers in 09... not including the guys that are listed as "athletes.." we are gonna have some unhappy campers...
lafell
toliver
jmitchell
cmitchell
dixon
jackson
tolliver
peterson
taylor
**randle
**wooten
**bell
not including benton & molton
lafell
toliver
jmitchell
cmitchell
dixon
jackson
tolliver
peterson
taylor
**randle
**wooten
**bell
not including benton & molton
This post was edited on 7/24/08 at 1:45 pm
1
Posted on 7/24/08 at 1:40 pm to Michael112189
why would they be unhappy?
people graduate, you know
people graduate, you know
Posted on 7/24/08 at 1:42 pm to Lester Earl
thats partially why we are not getting randle
Posted on 7/24/08 at 1:42 pm to Lester Earl
no pt
Posted on 7/24/08 at 1:43 pm to bossflossjr
quote:i highly doubt the depth chart means much to randle. just IMO
thats partially why we are not getting randle
Posted on 7/24/08 at 1:44 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
why would they be unhappy?
people graduate, you know
And transfer and switch postions and concentrate on baseball.
It will work itself out.
Posted on 7/24/08 at 1:44 pm to Cash
i hope so..
Posted on 7/24/08 at 1:44 pm to bossflossjr
quote:
thats partially why we are not getting randle
we are not getting randle?
Posted on 7/24/08 at 1:45 pm to Maximus
quote:
we are not getting randle?
I don't know. What is Vu saying on the subject?
Posted on 7/24/08 at 1:46 pm to bossflossjr
quote:
thats partially why we are not getting randle
Please, who of all those guys should Randle be afraid of?
We use different types of receivers in different spots. Randle is an elite talent, he will play.
Go find a hole to crawl in Chicken Little.
Posted on 7/24/08 at 1:46 pm to Cash
Pin says wait and see
Posted on 7/24/08 at 2:07 pm to Maximus
That entire list is unproven too, except Lafell and he could leave early. Not to mention I can almost guarantee some of those recruits are going to transfer. Dixon and C. Mitchell can't even sniff the field. J. Mitchell might leave early for Baseball. So no telling who leaves. I'm sure depth is not a concern for Randle because he'll immediately be towards the top and attrition will happen where several receivers will get mad and leave.
This post was edited on 7/24/08 at 2:08 pm
Posted on 7/24/08 at 2:11 pm to deuce985
our recievers that get no pt would start for MOST of the teams in the country!
Posted on 7/24/08 at 2:13 pm to deuce985
quote:
That entire list is unproven too, except Lafell and he could leave early. Not to mention I can almost guarantee some of those recruits are going to transfer. Dixon and C. Mitchell can't even sniff the field. J. Mitchell might leave early for Baseball. So no telling who leaves
all these guys will be SRs when the other guys are FR.
its a pretty good situation for a young WR
Posted on 7/24/08 at 2:17 pm to Lester Earl
(no message)
This post was edited on 7/24/08 at 2:19 pm
Posted on 7/24/08 at 2:18 pm to Michael112189
yeah, no shite. SO why did u start this thread? 
Posted on 7/24/08 at 2:29 pm to Lester Earl
I was wondering that too.
Posted on 7/24/08 at 2:31 pm to Lester Earl
This is a dumb thread!!! In between graduates kids jumping to the pros and redshirts everyone will be fine
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News