Started By
Message

re: “Relevant Statistics” Thread

Posted on 6/2/20 at 10:01 pm to
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
28733 posts
Posted on 6/2/20 at 10:01 pm to
quote:

But they're not all criminals and they don't attack at random. If we assume 1 victim per 1 attacker, they are mutually exclusive and non-repeating then according to the statistics 1.44% of blacks are committing attacks on whites and 0.03% of whites are committing attacks on blacks. On a number basis BoW is 9% more than WoB, but attacks adjusted as a percentage of total attacking population is how you get to 45X. It's actually 47.5X, and it is legitimate.

If by "legitimate" you mean "meaningless", then sure.


The number you have arrived at is more a reflection of the demographics of the country than it is a reflection of which race is most violent toward the other.

You are unwittingly accounting for the demographics in your calculations twice. Like I said, it is easy to manipulate people with statistics.
Posted by DemonKA3268
Parts Unknown
Member since Oct 2015
19277 posts
Posted on 6/2/20 at 10:04 pm to
Posted by David_DJS
Member since Aug 2005
18158 posts
Posted on 6/2/20 at 10:04 pm to
Kork -

There are 38 million blacks, and from this population 547,948 violent crimes are perpetrated on whites.

What's the likelihood that a black commits a violent crime against a white?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram